[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
4chan
/p/ - Photography
Return Catalog Bottom Refresh
Name
Options
Comment
Options


Gimmicks


PEE text
My Bans
Verification
File
    08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
    05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
    10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
    [Hide] [Show All]
    [Return] [Catalog] [Bottom]
    Anonymous
    If they were judged like photo(...)     No.4537517
    If they were judged like photographs  No.4537517
    >crushed blacks! lost detail in the shadows!
    >part of the sky is blown out!
    >why are the subjects in the CENTER?
    >needs some serious cropping dude
    >>
    Ken Rockwell
     No.4537519
     No.4537519
    Total slop. If you took my advice and used a do-everything zoom, you would actually be able to see the detail on the people and the cottage

    This is why you leave the primes to the pros people!
    >>
    Anonymous
     No.4537520
     No.4537520
    >>4537517
    >overexposed
    >needs more space for the man walking on the path
    >>
    Anonymous
     No.4537521
     No.4537521
    >>4537520
    >>4537517
    Weird green tint and wrong white balance, and you're clearly not setting your tone curves in camera because you dont have the skill to shoot jpeg or these would be more realistic and honest. Typical raw editor guesswork.
    >>
    Anonymous
     No.4537522
     No.4537522
    >>4537517
    >no information in her CRUSHED BLACK hair and clothing
    >>
    cANON !!IvQD0tg7ByS
     No.4537523
     No.4537523
    >>4537522
    lemme guess... canon rp. no dynamic range. and you mirrorless shills say it doesn't matter.
    >>
    Anonymous
     No.4537524
     No.4537524
    File: 1719378313520594.jpg (3.63 MB, 4500x2888)
    3.63 MB JPG
    >>4537517
    >scene is just too high contrast, too much clipping in the blacks, take at a different time of the day bro
    >>
    Anonymous
     No.4537525
     No.4537525
    File: Night at Gurzuf.jpg (960 KB, 3000x2247)
    960 KB JPG
    >>4537517
    >some bad GLARE reflected by the water
    >busy composition, what are OUR EYES SUPPOSED TO BE DIRECTED TO?
    >needs some cropping, lots of unnecessary space!
    >>
    Anonymous
     No.4537526
     No.4537526
    >>4537525
    Should have used a CPL and a long exposure (micro four thirds has better IBIS, fool framer. yeah, i see your HDR)

    sharp water just shows you dont know how to use a camera
    >>
    Anonymous
     No.4537529
     No.4537529
    >the snow is TOO BRIGHT, it is DRAGGING MY EYES DOWN and DOMINATING THE COMPOSITION
    >CLIPPING in the dark parts of the tree trunks! can you even METER correctly?
    >>
    Anonymous
     No.4537530
     No.4537530
    >OP's posts: mad because overexposure
    >other posts: actually funny
    >>
    Anonymous
     No.4537531
     No.4537531
    >>4537521
    >Weird green tint
    Shouldn't have used a Sony.
    >>
    Anonymous
     No.4537532
     No.4537532
    >>4537517
    >the image here is just TOO BUSY. there are TOO MANY SUBJECTS - what am I SUPPOSED TO BE LOOKING AT?
    >needs some SEVERE CROPPING
    >>
    Anonymous
     No.4537534
     No.4537534
    >>4537517
    >not enough DETAIL in the SHADOWS
    >why so much space at the top? CROP it out
    >>
    Anonymous
     No.4537535
     No.4537535
    >>4537534
    Ok, now it sounds like your screen is broken

    This image has a lot of detail in the shadows
    >>
    Anonymous
     No.4537536
     No.4537536
    >>4537535
    >but there's just NOT ENOUGH shadow detail, there COULD BE MORE. some parts of the image have NO TEXTURE. PURE BLACK IS EVIL.
    >>
    Anonymous
     No.4537537
     No.4537537
    >>4537524
    Literally just a snapshot. Learn to compose.
    >>
    Anonymous
     No.4537538
     No.4537538
    >>4537536
    You're just seething about this specifically over and over again. It's getting cringe.

    I've never even seen it outside of ken rockwell's blog and that weird jpeg panasonic shill's posts
    >>
    Anonymous
     No.4537539
     No.4537539
    >>4537538
    >YOU JUST DON'T GET IT. CLIPPED BLACKS AND WHITES ARE SIGNS OF THE AMATEUR, THEY JUST RUIN THE IMAGE. LEARN TO HDR IN LIGHTROOM AND GET BACK TO ME CHAMP.
    >>
    Anonymous
     No.4537540
     No.4537540
    >>4537538
    Kek you come across as a bigger whiner than him

    You had to post this twice because no one cared the first time
    BTC
    bc1qtm4rep7kyp2p28hlkfktpnd0j7uew47vnt2mev
    LTC
    ltc1q9xlaysse0mpfwf025esd69kt9zu3md22gh23du
    ETH
    0x6abA18D203520c8F90ca63eE7426a7bC345D98e6
    SOL
    E5ekoiauCR8yiNp451dmuPzhUxo84P5x3m9WJBK5kxZe
    XRP
    r3jYXNdMk2Vz5hXhKCKE9re8uz93JQFG1r
    DOGE
    DSBq5jRWkiwmEh1G7zBwmQDgRkvRr61fmb
    XMR
    85CTwq5wGjWZw5GgzgwZPrHyZxpLXMK5oZSSSk5j4x9w1bpqzisaWAUZYaAPfh6rP2MZJcaFqF1XmEzkw6YCqJSS2Txu6Z8
    [Return] [Catalog] [Top]
    Legal · Terms of Service · Privacy Policy · [email protected]
    Post a Reply
    Return Catalog Top Refresh
    Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
    [Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

    [Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

    All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.