>it now cost $20 to develop film only with no prints or scans AHHHHHHHHH

Go /p/ro. Want: • Expect criticism regarding your uploads. • /p/ is for photos: so feel free to post them as often as possible, even if "image unrelated" to your text. • Use "Recent Photos" threads if you are shy or only want to post a small number of photos. • Raw Files which can be collectively edited for discussion of post-processing techniques are encouraged. • Please check the catalogue for similar topic(s) before creating a new thread. Do Not Want: • Go to /wsr/ or /r/ for specific Photoshop requests. • Gear threads are discouraged but permitted. Keep in mind that many users simply hide these threads. Want to learn more? • The /p/ Wiki

Rank the Trump Portraits

Can someone tell me what lightning equipment I would need, to recreate either of those photos?

Why has the world abandoned photo shoots of good looking women? 99% of anything I see now is selfies and if its a photoshoot its just to sell clothing or some super generic looking agency testshoot. 10 years ago or whatever the world was full of every good looking girl doing multiple photoshoots just for content. What happened?

Reply if you're a real mf'er

What makes Japan such an desired place for photography? I'm really trying to understand the hype around it. When I visited of course the size of Tokyo itself opens lots of opportunities but I quickly notice that it gets repetitive rather fast. All muh taxis look the same, the buildings have a pattern that repeats a lot. If you've seen a few shrines/temples.. in the end they all look the same. Even if you visit other prefectures you won't see much of a difference. Whenever I see camera vlogs or flickr uploads in Japan I now tend to skip because it's always the same. My current number one location would probably be Germany. Still safe enough to bring your camera with you, every state has it's own architectural style. Towns are usually a comfy mix between old medieval houses in the center with grim 60s bauhaus constructions that look really odd. Also home of Leica where this sort of everyday compact photography started. What do you think? What's your prefered location?

It is time.

Insta and whatever else thread for wherever anons post their photos. https://www.instagram.com/mondatta.photography/ Do any of you tend to go for certain themes and styles? Or just try anything?

Redpill me on screen vs viewfinder debate. Personally I find screen to be way more comfortable. Viewfinder is a total pain in the ass.

This thread is dedicated to close-range photographic captures utilising macro-optical imaging configurations to achieve greater reproduction ratios. Got it? Good now upload some shit. Last thread: >>4433352

I am going to post random images I made which I have also edited and I would love my /p/iss bros to give me feedback on my composition, but mostly editing style... or direct me towards an editing style that would fit me. >feedback on composition >feedback on editing >direct my towards my own style Starting with opening image...

Color doesn't matter. Today when you can adjust colors just by pressing a button there's nothing more fake than a color. You should only shot B&W. Black and White photography is real and pure. Shape, shadow and light - this is what makes your photography look special, not some bright oversaturation. If your picture looks good without colors then your picture is worthy

So when are we doing this again?

Soft Edition The aim of this thread is to discuss compact digital cameras (digishits) and share photos from them. If your digishit has a "soft" picture mode, take some photos with it and share them in this thread. Feel free to share your digishit photos taken in any other picture mode, too. Previous Thread: >>4477534

Previous Thread: >>4408437 My astronomy club is doing an outreach on smart telescopes in a few more months so I decided it pick up an S30. Its been delightful so far; setup is a breeze compared to my primary rig. Think it will be a great little thing for more casual imaging. We're not in the best time of year for my FOV, but I was able to get a little time in on M5.

>Nocturnal photography (also referred to as night photography) refers to the practice of taking photographs outdoors between dusk and dawn, when natural light is minimal or nonexistent. >The low-light conditions night photographers work in require specialized techniques to achieve proper exposure, including long exposures—ranging from several seconds to days—higher ISO sensitivity, or artificial lighting. >The genre encompasses a wide range of subjects, including urban and rural landscapes, architecture, industrial sites, and astrophotography. Post your night photos!

Moar?

>The Ansel Adams Publishing Rights Trust has raised concerns over what it describes as the unauthorised use of Ansel Adams’s name and work in an “AI-generated colour version” of his iconic photograph shot in 1942 Moonrise, Hernandez, New Mexico, which was recently exhibited and offered for sale at a major international photography fair. >In a statement, the Trust said the work “exploited Ansel’s name, reputation, and his most iconic image, while failing to identify any human artist responsible for its creation. The Trust did not authorise, endorse, consent to, or acquiesce in the ‘AI-generated colour version’ of ‘Moonrise, Hernandez, New Mexico’ exhibited and offered for sale by Danziger Gallery at The Photography Show presented by AIPAD in April. The Trust was not consulted or notified before the work appeared. Once alerted, we reached out to James Danziger in real time, notifying him of the Trust’s rights, and asking for the work to be removed. Correspondence shared with the Trust shows that, despite our formal notice, Mr. Danziger subsequently leveraged Ansel’s name, ‘Moonrise,’ and the AIPAD presentation while pursuing a proposed commercial AI colourisation venture involving other artists’ estates.” >James Danziger made a response on the Danziger website to Ansel Adams Trust's condemnation by not only mentioning that the image is technically in the public domain, but also wrote: "As for the print itself, while A.I. served as the starting point, the final image involved extensive human intervention, editing, proofing, and refinement over many months."

Summer 2026 edition All video related questions and discussion is intended for this thread. Here we discuss techniques, gear and anything else related to capturing video footage. Please don't pretend to be an expert if you don't know what you're talking about. Kindly leave your ego at the door. Posting short films/scripts or other work you've done is encouraged. We tend to use and recommend DSLRs/mirrorless cameras because they provide phenomenal picture quality for their price, have large sensors (ie the same size used in high-end cinema cameras, and larger) and have interchangeable lenses. In contrast, consumer camcorders often have much smaller sensors and a fixed lens. >STICKY - https://text.is/QZ1J >Helpful guide, additional books and more in-depth FAQs - https://web.archive.org/web/20200926115310/https://pastebin.com/kG0gRmTZ >NO ONE CARES WHAT AN EXPERT YOU THINK YOU ARE. IF YOU’RE ASKING BASIC-AS-SHIT QUESTIONS, YOU CAN’T BE ALL THAT GREAT. SEE ABOVE Previous thread >>4499500 Quick FAQS >what’s the best camera available on a “budget”? The blackmagic pocket cinema camera 4k, or the Panasonic gh5 (can pick one up for like 500 bucks atm) >what’s a good beginner video camera? Anything that works, shoots at least 1080p and preferably has interchangeable lenses. Any recommendation beyond that will cause arguments so read the fucking sticky if that isn't satisfactory. >What's a good sound solution that won't break the bank? Zoom h1 >Can I use a zoom lens for video? Yes >Do I need cine lenses? No >Do I need 4k? No. 1080 looks great on a cinema screen. 4k looks better. >Can someone tell me if my video is any good? Yes, but be prepared to receive harsh criticism. If you're going to waste 5 minutes of our time with a shitty out-of-focus montage of nothing then we'll tell you that it's crap >Is it okay to dox myself? ...Personally I wouldn't but what do I know?

Kodak Charmera kings rise up

Theme: Clouds All photos must be taken during the current challenge month. No old or archived shots. Get creative and enjoy the process. Unique perspectives are encouraged!

itt: post your non-standard color photos. your lomo turquoise, your harman red, your aerochrome, and all the like. I guess if you do weird stuff with your digital sensors that's fine too. shot a roll of kono donau II last weekend, its a blue monochromatic c-41 film rated at ISO 8.

https://strawpoll.com/7MZ0kRk7rgo

Maybe camera glasses are the way for street photography so you stop taking photos of stranger's backs in public. They shoot video too though vertical

Photo taken on top of Lovcen mountain in Montenegro

Can you take amazing shots and get good at photography with just a point and shoot? I'm getting sick of carrying around my bulky setup everywhere, even though it's M43

Does anyone else here take pairs of images to synthesize depth in mages? This was taken from the Lummi Reservation looking east to Mt. Baker and the Sisters. Base was about 100 meters.

Any Nokia or 2G cellphone camera photo lover here?

Please rate. 0: uninteresting snapshit 1: deeply flawed 2: decent, interesting, cool 3: striking image

A photograph is simply a photon's recorded wave function. It ripples through spacetime and is possible due to it being electromagnetic fields. Digital cameras treat its fields like a solar panel would. Why it act like this is in order for a photon to get its wave function quantization exist. So all in all it is just the energy of quantization. Possible due to the mathematical nature of the universe. And all of this photography is possible because a photon's wave function can be accumulated enough to be recorded. The joke I make about this is that it is like engineering an image from how a camera is exposed to the scene it sees from the ripples of light.

rate my film snapshits from my Vietnam trip shot on a Ricoh GR1

Remember when everyone would come to this place to post fun photos and critique each other? We can and WILL have fun photo generals here again and not just another gear thread You do actually take photos with those expensive cameras you're buying, right anon?

I want to start a /p/ monthly, or tri-monthly, photo competition where the prize is actually desirable and relevant to photography: film rolls. Of course, they’ll be cheap, readily-available film stock like Ultramax 400 or Gold 200, or whatever else is easy and inexpensive to get ahold of, but the problem is this: how shall voting stay honest, and how shall the winner’s address stay anonymous when I send him the prize? I don’t want the poll’s integrity to be compromised, nor the winner’s anonymity. Who has some ideas for how this could be set up?

Theme: Night Lights Let`s keep it limited to artificial lights for this month. All photos must be taken during the current challenge month. No old or archived shots. Get creative and enjoy the process. Unique perspectives are encouraged! Previous thread:>>4515121 >Go highlight your choice of best pics!

Where the hell do you get models these days? It used to be that you would just go on Model Mayhem or find some chick on instagram and shoot TFP but those days are over. I wouldn't even mind paying for a chick's time, but even that seems difficult these days. Not a lot of chicks into "modeling" these days, no websites dedicated to it, etc. I guess they're all doing onlyfans or something. Any way, anyone got some tips?

How long can you let it sit after exposing but before developing? Online I see everything from "you should develop within a few days of exposure" to "you can leave it up till its expiry date no problem". I asked a local camera shop and they said 6-10 months before you start to see degradation depending on the film. Who's telling the truth? I don't remember ever worrying about this back when I was using disposable cameras for everything.

Newfag here, I really like shooting buildings but don't really know what to do beyond hurr durr point and shoot so any criticism or advice is appreciated. (1/15)

Hi /p/. This month I was attending two anime cons, as "officially approved" photog and I wanted to upload some of the photos I did for opinions and advices. I made similar threads in previous years and they were always very productive so I would like to hear your opinions about these as well. This was also some sort of "test run" for new camera (Nikon Z5 II, replacing D750), most of these shots were made with Tamron 24-70 f/2.8 G2 lens (via FTZ II adapter), only few with telephoto (Nikon 70-200 f/2.8 VRII). Also newest version of Darktable, since old ones would not handle the new camera. There is always room for improvement and I genuinely want to get better so any kind of advice, critique or opinion is welcome. If you like, I can also try uploading RAW files for selected photos, on temporary catbox link or similar.

Does anyone have any recommendations on where to find good scans of essential photobooks? the wiki links are all dead

>be Shigemi Sugimoto >former principal engineer of Olympus' camera business >have your entire fucking division bought out by Japan Industrial Partners >literally the King Von of the Japanese consumer technology industry >killed Sony Vaio >killed Toshiba >killed Rohm Semiconductor >killed Olympus' Telecommunications sector before they killed off their camera business >raped Japan's thermography business >spent the latter part of 30 years patent-trolling and carving out corporations >buy back OM System with own money like a boss >never make the company publically traded >never sell out to Israel like Nikon (TowerJazz) >one OM employee leaked that this motherfucker was gonna make a medium format Olympus camera before the company imploded More autists like him should lead camera companies. He will save the camera industry.

So this one is about horizon and field?

Aura.

I'm gonna dump the pictures I took on my first trip to China and share my impressions along the way. Save for the snaps, I mostly shot analog with my F90x, and with my gf's mju. I'm very much open to criticism.

Will update as images are processed, will be Speedweek and a bunch of other stuff I did over the months.

What has the consequences been since everyone has access to either a digital camera or a smartphone with up to 200 MP sensors? Snapshits were easy to identify in the 80s because they were often shitty point and shoot, or Polaroids, but what gear does the snapshitter use now other than smartphones? Has the ubiquity of photography destroyed whatever strange, new artform was budding?

First time taking photos Don’t have a camera yet so used 3ds I think this one looks quite nice

I thought freeware was a meme until I tried RawTherapee and Darktable, and quickly realized the amount of neetbucks I would've saved had I not used Lightroom sooner. I don't even take pictures regularly. Why do photographers shill a corporation with comical levels of greed?

Eclipse edition Former thread: >>4519819 Took this one in Paris as the eclipse was winding down. Spanishbros, post your eclipse pics.

How can a portrait represent something about someone other than mere appearance? Can you draw out an internal character or trait from compositional elements?

would it be technically possible to control ISO and shutter speed (if electronic) on a per pixel basis?

I'll start

why do stock photos always have this ugly neutral, super low contrast look? does it have a name? I call it the 'unsplash look', but I don't know why this is so popular. it looks cheap and it is not eye-catching at all.

does he still hold up in 2026?

When are we getting a camera with a cross-shaped sensor or an oversized square sensor with dark corners? This should already be the standard on the tiny smartphone sensors so I don't have to rotate my phone

I'm a poorfag and used exclusively old manual lenses for the longest time because that was all I could afford. Last month I finally bought my first modern AF lens (Sony 85mm f1.8 if you were wondering) and I've been thrilled with the optical quality, it's amazing the step up that happened in the 30 to 40 year gap between it and my previous lenses. I'm finding though that even if I put it in manual mode and manual focusing it just doesn't feel the same to use in terms of joy and I don't know why? It's like I don't feel as involved in the photographic process when using it, whereas the old lenses it was a lot more visceral - the click of the aperture ring; working in combination with the focusing ring and the camera settings to try and push the old glass to its limits and get the most out of it. The new lens just feels too "perfect" and thus feels boring to work with. A lot of the time I just end up sticking it in auto mode with a feeling of resignation. Anyone else ever feel like this? Pic rel taken on a Vivitar Series 1 70-210mm

todd hido enjoyers, share your pics P.S. Please close your blinds at night. I already feel weird enough photographing your home in the middle of the night.

Dusk encounter edition

What are your favorite modern photographers that you follow on insta, flickr, blogs? I want to follow some more work of others but all the popular ones that come up always are those influencer promoting their gear that they change every month. Many years ago I really liked Takashi Yasui's photos but damn they aged badly.

Only A Gameboy Camera Is Good Enough™ Previously: >>4524132

>he takes pics landscape

as a beginner, should i buy a 55-250mm lens or a 50mm lens? i dont know specifically what i want to shoot yet.

A picture with the Moon making the image interesting - can be just the Moon, or the Moon just being pretty with foreground objects or stars and planets, new or old, but OC. See finder image (next post) for exif.

does anyone take photos of abandoned buildings ?

Is the dji pocket 4 a meme if I want something small and handheld for travel and cinematic videos? it's like $700 which feels expensive as fuck but I don't know what else offers the same at the form factor. it's also not available in the US which is extremely annoying and would force me to pay $50+ for import fees

I took this photo with a friend of mine as a souvenir but like there's something I did wrong and that this photo doesn't look very good to me, do you have any other tips on what I can improve in this photo /p/?

Any of you use an 8x10 before? Is it as cozy as it seems.

leaf edition Former thread: >>4523061

Bald edition ITT people who don’t take photos or own cameras discuss how the camera they might consider buying later is the reason their theoretical future photos look bad Last containment thread >>4525019

Do you consider political portraiture as art?

Will they finally announce tg-8 on 9th? Any leaks?

nice guy but damn his photos suck

Theme: Food All photos must be taken during the current challenge month. No old or archived shots. Get creative and enjoy the process. Unique perspectives are encouraged! Previous thread:>>4519751 >Go highlight your choice of best pics!

Anyone here is a street photographer? How do you deal with all the cringe? Because everyone gets pissy; it's cringy as hell getting in their business. I thought people would be way cooler with what we're doing.

Why do companies ship cameras with the viewfinder missing? What causes this behaviour? Why do people buy them? What is the use case? I can't think of any reason to intentionally design or buy a camera without one. It's not like the viewfinder somehow makes the camera worse, or makes it appreciably heavier/bulkier, or appreciably more expensive. It's just useful with no downsides.

I want to get back into shooting film. How's the film and film camera market looking since 5 years ago?

Oops! Edition Please post film photos, talk about film photography, film gear like cameras, film stocks, news, and tips/tricks in this thread. Also talk about darkroom practices, enlargers, photo paper, techniques like dodging/burning, tools, and equipment related to enlarging, developing, and printing. Thread Question: Did you pick up film as a hobby after shooting digital? Or did you just never stop shooting film? And do you do both simultaneously now (phone snapshits don't count)? Previous thread: >>4520917

Well... I tried to find liminal and unsetting places in my Russian city. Post your liminal photos here

>Sony makes the worlds most used number 1 reliable professional camer-ACK! Last containment thread: >>4525985

The price of classic cameras is getting outrageous. The 7ii is now $6,000. >just film on digital Some of us consider ourselves camera historians, but now it is literally impossible to get most of the classics due to zoomers buying them up and cranking up the costs.

Gigantic Pentax news! https://news.ricoh-imaging.co.jp/rim_info2/2026/20260909_042557.html Shortened takeaways from the pentaxforums summary: 1) More Pentax DSLRs are coming. Ricoh is committing to "a new series of digital SLR cameras based on an entirely new concept," built on the K-mount legacy. 2) Current K-series production is ending. 3) It may be a while.

Just ordered my first p1100 superzoom. What should I expect? Will my new zoom addiction be satisfied?

Is photography art? Be honest.

What's the verdict on this guy? Is he cool? Does he know his shit? Is he retarded? Am I the retard for watching his videos?

Innovation is dead Part 2 edition Previous: >>4526676

Fastest and easiest NON-WEBSITE way for a retard to convert shitloads of JPEGs to lossless JXL? Even better if I can convert other formats with the same program. I know GIMP can export JXLs but doing it that way for every single image I want to convert one at a time would take forever and a half.

Henri Cartier Bresson would use a digital autofocus point-and-shit cam these days.

Was playing around with quality settings for fun and accidentally discovered that actually, super low quality JPEGs can look kind of cool and aesthetic. Give it a try, cook some JPEGs at arbitrarily low quality and see how they look. I've gotten best results from qual=0 to qual=10, personally, with most looking best around qual=5 or lower. Tips: >No difference between qual=0 and qual=3. Qual=4 is the first step that looks different from qual=0. >4:4:4 subsampling yields a finer pixelisation effect than 4:2:0, although the actual difference in practice is not always noticeable. I don't think either is necessarily better than the other in terms of achieving the look. >Progressive encoding and optimised Huffman tables have no effect on the look so no reason not to use em. >Smoothing changes the pixelisation a little bit but not enough to worry about imo, mostly just makes it looks blurrier/fuzzier. Actually I think the softer edges detract from the harsh look. Picrel is the one that started it all. Looks like something you'd see in an Amiga game. I'm gonna try printing some of these on copy paper with my home office inkjet to "enhance" the look. >Local dogsnapper likes low-quality images Pottery. Not huskyfag btw.

I bought some slides off eBay and scanned them. These are from the 60s to the 90s. The majority of them appear to be from a family on the west coast, but some appear to be from the Philippines.

I'm a broke college grad trying to make a quick buck, I've never done photography before. What camera would I need to buy and how would I start getting clients?

Egg anon should look into Josef Sudek; his still life photographs are amazing.

Selling prints and exhibiting are great but that’s not really the bread and butter of art photography. Have you guys never tried to publish your own photobooks or zines? This YouTube channel posts small press photobooks and has interviews with photographers: https://youtu.be/RV9OX4o4ITQ?si=3juCfOxR4AIip2v0 If you make your own imprint, you could take all the profits and royalties from sales. It might mean working for not much money but it’s a better side hustle than most other arts and crafts.

>Be vintage gearfag >Own literally 10 of the same goddamn camera for no reason >Wonder why prices are going up while you keep hoarding >Maybe finally sell one or two many years later after much humming and hawing for 10x what you paid for it, minimum, no lowballers I know what I got! What causes this behaviour? How can we stop these autistic, selfish faggots from driving prices through the roof in literally every vintage market they touch? Why do they not want to share what they love with others? Do they realise that greed is a sin? Do they care? Do they even use their cameras to take photos?

Why can't Olympus make a camera this compact? Why can't Panasonic? Are they stupid? This is literally the only M43 camera with any raison d'être at all right now.

New motto - gear only matters if your photo doesn't suck.

Is there a place for this time of cameras outside Electronic News Gathering? i thinks they're pretty neat, but even in the same Canon line, the biggest upgrade was adding USB C

Unsuccessful Tries Edition Previously: >>4525845

Hi /p/, visitor from /lit/ here. I know nothing about cameras but for years I've really liked looking at pictures. Shoutout Ralph Eugene Meatyard, Vivian Maier, Roger Ballen, Emmet Gowin, Stacy Kranitz, Bruce Gilden, Dawoud Bey, Tseng Kwong Chi, Saul Leiter, Frederick Sommer, Mario Giacomelli, Lucas Samaras, Nan Golding, the Japanese guy who took all those raven pictures, many others. They might be memes, I don't know, I just really like their pictures. I have about 500 bucks to spend and I want to buy a camera. I'm thinking about a used picrel (Canon EOS R1000) with whatever used lens it normally comes with, think it's called a RF-S 18-45mm? I don't really know much about gear, just want to start taking pictures. I'm vaguely aware that once you buy a camera you're "locked into its system" of lenses, etc. I've heard the name Canon before so I figure that buying more lenses at some point in a few years won't be a problem. I want to take digital pictures because I don't want to pay for film right now, learn to develop, all of that. Am I being retarded about this, or is this a good purchase? Thanks in advance. In a form of payment, have a book recommendation -- currently reading "Love's Work" by Gillian Rose, short memoir by a philosopher who wrote it while dying of ovarian cancer. Strongly recommend.

This might be the most niche request, but I find a certain charm and seeing photos in dated equipment,

Previous - >>4528802 >Lord of Rings edition Melty prone dogphiles need not apply

Last superzoom compact camera models came out before COVID. Is there really no market anymore for these? Smartphones still cannot match that 720mm eq. tele end

The depth of field is related to two factors: 1) the size of the circle of confusion and 2) the pixel pitch on the sensor. the bigger the CoC the smaller the DoF. the smaller the PP the smaller the DoF. So, is it safe to say, that a FF sensor with 16um PP has the same DoF as a MFT sensor with 4um PP?

Previous - >>4529615 >wet plate chud edition

How come no one posts here? Photography is a pretty big hobby, and it has become very fashionable to shoot film in recent years, so why is this board completely abandoned?

"The View From Your Room" Edition Previously: >>4530268

First you had film: a chemical process that already distorted reality. The world went into the camera, got chemically bullied, and came out looking like reality according to film. Then they made a “film sim”. Except the simulation looks nothing like film. It is two-faced and half-hearted. But it’s perfect, because now, say, “Provia” no longer has to signify the actual film but the SIGN of Provia. You aren't getting Provia, just the marketing team’s idea of what the cultural memory of Provia is supposed to feel like. The signified has begun to evaporate. But fujislugs still weren't satisfied, so now the DIGITAL camera displays a little box end on the rear screen. If you’re a zoomer, that’s the cardboard tab you'd put in the holder on the back of the camera reminding you of the film you loaded. But there is no film, no box, no physical thing inside the camera that needs identifying. Literally a simulation of the thing that used to tell you which film was inside the camera. It’s displaying a simulation of the signifier of a nonexistent signified. You successfully reached the point where the camera says: “Here is the little square that would have told you which film you loaded into the camera.” Except you loaded a menu option instead of film, and now the camera is proudly showing you the nostalgic little fake box for the imaginary film you didn't load. There is no film, no Provia, no box. There never was. There never will be. There is only a crude mockery on the back of the camera telling you that there is. Fitting that it's X-TRANS. Reality > film > film look > film simulation > simulation of the film label > ??? In the end the camera is no longer pretending to reproduce reality. It's pretending to reproduce the evidence that reality was once being reproduced. It's transfilm, and it doesn't pass. It's Baudrillard's hyperreality except instead of Disneyland it's an X-Pro3 displaying a fake Provia box while you photograph your animal companion.

Hi, I heard this was a good place to get feedback and advice on my photography. How can I get a consistent “look” with direct flash portrait photography? Specifically, I usually shoot in shutter priority and a static ISO depending on lighting. I have been keeping my flash manual because I noticed TTL was very inconsistent with flash power and not every shot came out how I wanted. The issue I have is that as lighting changes and as I move around or change my focal length I have to adjust my flash, take a test shot, then adjust again, etc. until I have it dialed in to the “look” I am going for. What can I do to improve my process?

Lens Compression Edition Former thread: >>4529005

Is Neil Postman correct about the best photography being in television ads? Excerpt from "Amusing Ourselves to Death".

>astro tripod edition Previous - >>4530983

would b-roll footage, the world and society as a whole look less lame and gay if we went back to shooting with analog and digicams without any post processing that smartphones do?

Can somebody please take photos of clouds with this camera? Preferably at day and dusk, ISO 100. I'm thinking about getting one, but I'm not sure. I mostly shoot clouds, and this Foveon X3 sensor attracts me with it's colors

How to avoid diffraction with my camera?

>filtered edition In the last episode of guitar general: >>4531957

Canon Powershot SD100

I'll just share a cool photo of river

Full Spectrum Edition Former thread: >>4531544

alright now you have no excuse not to be using photoshop and(or) lightroom

Trichromatic edition (strong filters are better for color according to PhaseONE, Kasson is WRONG) https://youtube.com/watch?v=HHM-vp9lWkk Previous national tragedy thread: >>4532911

Let's see your photographs of fire.

Previous: >>4531544

"Don't Feed The Tripfags" Edition Previously: >>4533681

Seoul dump. Feel free to dump your seoul photos. 1/106

I like editing the photos I take in Photoshop, anyone else take photos like this? 1/5

Meds edition Previous: >>4534229

Back in July 2021 there was a thread here about Burna. I found it on an archive https://archived[.]moe/p/thread/3910777 but links to full images are 404. Anyone else still around from back then save the pics? TYIAA

Autumn colors edition

Be honest, we all have at least one

Recommendations for a family camera? Family of four looking for a camera that takes decent photos and video and is portable enough to always have on hand during vacations and events. I'm willing to pay a decent amount but nothing obscene and I don't care if its film or digital but I guess the video requirement necessitates digital.

KENTMERE PAN 400

Here are 5 randomly chosen words. Create a photograph that incorporates as many of them as possible. Just one is fine, but more is better. No rules, time limits, or pressure. Put as much or as little effort into it as you want. Have fun and contribute!

The DIY joy of reflex edition, this French madman Denis Mo actually made his own SLR from scratch. Previous: >>4535009

i saw in other threads anons saying that more people should make threads for their photo sets rather than fill /rpt/ with them so here we go last week I got a haul of vintage canon FD lenses from a thrift store for a couple dollars. every image I post in here is taken with one of those lenses adapted to my Canon R7 APS-C Mirrorless. Most of them are taken with a Canon FD 50mm f1.8 that was in poor condition before I took it apart and cleaned it. every photo was then edited in lightroom (some lightly, some heavily) and compressed. This was my first time really using manual focus so no guarantee of sharp focus. I plan to shoot with these lenses more so I will update this thread as long as it stays alive. I encourage others to post their photos taken with vintage lenses on modern bodies as well!

I don't know if I'm in the right place here, but today I got a disposable camera at the flea market in Pforzheim for just under €1, and it's still partially wrapped in plastic, so it's partly in its original packaging. She has a roll of film that can only take 15 photos; no pictures have been taken yet. This camera is from Fujifilm, but it has a piece of paper over it stating that it is from the brand "Bär," or that it has simply been resold under that brand. It expired around 2005. I can't find any Pictures of it anywhere.

Made this zine with photos from Kolkata... I am not a fan of writing long walls of text to explain the work or maybe its just not that deep. Tried to illustrate the masculinity of the workers in contrast to the flowers' delicacy and also tried to transmit the claustrophobic aspect of that market with images with strong blacks. Printed it at home. Rate it harshly.

Post your Nature photos and I'll gradually post some of mine that I took over the years. Anything from Animals, Views, Plants, Weather, etc.. Please feel free to share any stories or tips on taking better photos of the natural world.

Wait, /p/ has rules?

"Attack of the MILC" Edition Previously: >>4535937

How can I recreate a photo like this solo? A huge flower field has bloomed near me and I want to recreate similar shots. I was thinking about duct taping my DSLR onto a ladder

I'd like to post some of the stuff I shot over the years to get some feedback. I'll go trough some analog stuff shot on point and shoot first, fujica stx-1 and then some digital. (I'll provide model for film and camera if I can recall it). Personally I'm almost never happy with the framing and often I need to adjust/distort in post to get satisfaction. Also one constant observation I made is that it would have been better to move closer to subject, and yet I still fail to do that too often. First pic: Kodak 200, minolta zoom 80

Theme: Autumn All photos must be taken during the current challenge month. No old or archived shots. Get creative and enjoy the process. Unique perspectives are encouraged! Previous thread:>>4526290 >Go highlight your choice of best pics!

I always feel a little dirty when a photo looks good in greyscale but not in color

"SOVL vs SOVLLESS" Edition Previously: >>4536628

I'm quite surprised that we haven't really seen Ai being used in panorama stitching software. I would have thought that, by now, we would be seeing neural feature matching, depth aware alignment, generative seam reconstruction, etc. Ai being used to identify surfaces and textures and blend them properly. To spot perspective and angle changes and account for them in the stitching. Yet here we are, with photoshop and PTGui, still using stitching methods from 2007. I guess theres just no money in stitching. Except maybe for adobe, who are on their asses right now and charging people extra just to generate small image fixes.

Street photos that became famous/iconic outside of the photography scene thread

>crushed blacks! lost detail in the shadows! >part of the sky is blown out! >why are the subjects in the CENTER? >needs some serious cropping dude