[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
4chan
/p/ - Photography

Name
Options
Comment
Options


Gimmicks


PEE text
My Bans
Verification
File

    08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
    05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
    10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
    [Hide] [Show All]




    File: 1000209994.jpg (1.21 MB, 4080x3072)
    1.21 MB JPG
    I don't know if I'm in the right place here, but today I got a disposable camera at the flea market in Pforzheim for just under €1, and it's still partially wrapped in plastic, so it's partly in its original packaging.
    She has a roll of film that can only take 15 photos; no pictures have been taken yet.
    This camera is from Fujifilm, but it has a piece of paper over it stating that it is from the brand "Bär," or that it has simply been resold under that brand.
    It expired around 2005.
    I can't find any Pictures of it anywhere.
    >>
    Even if this was rare the only rare thing about it would be the cardboard cover as the camera is most likely generic. Since it has no collector value (no IP), it would guess it's a worth about what you paid for it minus the price of film development.
    >>
    Idk, the Film in it is also rare, i think Fuji stopped the Produktion of Film with only 15 Pictures.
    But i think it is a bit are because of the Cover, but only a bit
    >>
    >>4536162
    Depending on how it was stored the film could be useless.
    >>
    >>4536222#
    Idk, i got it on the flemarket
    >>
    File: jeans.png (1.04 MB, 1051x811)
    1.04 MB PNG
    There are believe it or not collectors of disposable cameras, but this seems to be oddly specific and finding anyone who are willing to pay a premium for it is next to impossible.
    >>
    >>4536162
    Having only 15 pictures only mean that if ever this was valuable film, which it is most certainly not, it would be worth only half of what a 36 roll would be. So if this was a roll of something like fuji natura, which it is not, and it was conserved well, which it certainly was not, it would be worth up to 25$. But it's not.
    BTC
    bc1qtm4rep7kyp2p28hlkfktpnd0j7uew47vnt2mev
    LTC
    ltc1q9xlaysse0mpfwf025esd69kt9zu3md22gh23du
    ETH
    0x6abA18D203520c8F90ca63eE7426a7bC345D98e6
    SOL
    E5ekoiauCR8yiNp451dmuPzhUxo84P5x3m9WJBK5kxZe
    XRP
    r3jYXNdMk2Vz5hXhKCKE9re8uz93JQFG1r
    DOGE
    DSBq5jRWkiwmEh1G7zBwmQDgRkvRr61fmb
    XMR
    85CTwq5wGjWZw5GgzgwZPrHyZxpLXMK5oZSSSk5j4x9w1bpqzisaWAUZYaAPfh6rP2MZJcaFqF1XmEzkw6YCqJSS2Txu6Z8




    Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
    [Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

    [Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

    All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.