>>4535646
ok i got a used eso rp on the way along with a used 50mm f/1.8

looking a getting a 2/3 pack of batteries but was reading comments and one said the brand they got didnt work with rp video mode. does anyone happen to have an off brand battery they are using with an rp that works perfectly?

>>4535646
Phone camera

An used EOS RP, a 50mm f1.8, and a godox it32

>>4535653
Wasasbi/powerextra etc will work but won't show the battery meter or charge in camera

>>4535653
you dont actually need extra batteries. the RP can charge from USBC power banks.

>>4535653
Ty for not being a retard and going with a sane choice. This may anger the tripfags who will tell you that you should have bought a Canon R3 and 70-200 f/2.8 or use your phone.

You have a normal sized sensor, moderately modern technology, a lightweight setup, and access to tonnes of cheap good lenses via an ef-rf adapter if you do wish.

Video on the RP isn't fantastic - 4k24p max iirc - but you spent what, like $500? Most faggots otb here spend that on their shitty quarter frame purse accessories.

>>4535712
>4k24 with a great SOOC look (with highlight tone priority or w/e turned on) isn't fantastic
Yeah bro, you need 4k60, with no crop factor, downsampled, no line skipped, in 10 bit log HEIC and it needs to be DCI 4k because its more CINE

>>4535759
Yeah okay there chudderino, calm down with the strawman arguments.
4k24 is just an odd spot where 30fps is much more common and desirable, so if the user wants 30fps they have to shoot FHD. This is fine, it's just, you know, average.
I don't even like the hybridization of cameras, but it's not some radical take to say 1080p30 isn't fantastic video.

>>4535646
Welcome to /p. Please use the gear thread.

>>4535653
When you start struggling with unevenly lit scenes and blown skies or ugly noise you'll remember that you can hold a tripfag accountable for what he posts bit not an anon. I hope you don't but know you likely will. They tricked you into buying one of the worst full frame mirrorless cameras in the market. Corner cutting is all over the place and the sensor is sadly no exception. It is designed to make you want to upgrade.

>>4535712
>shitty quarter frame purse accessories
Have you seen the crop the RP does in 4k stabilized? You get even less than MFT area if you enable the electronic stabilization

>>4535769
>odd spot
Actually 24fps is more desirable than 30 which is more soap opera than cinema tier
>>4535775
Even the videos of people praising the RP only highlight how bad it is lmao

>>4535773
Lmao you dont even know what its like to use a camera you just select +6EV shadow pushes on a dpreview test chart that's it

If you have a skill issue, please buy a nikon Z5/Z6mk1 instead. However it's pointless to do so and buy into nikon's shitty color science.

>>4535775
That's why canon makes stabilized lenses, and why OP was recommended zooms and the 35mm f2 IS as spendier but better alternatives to the 50mm

>>4535773
when your only other recommendation is a horrible, dogshit DSLR from 2013 an RP looks like an amazing camera. there's not much better that isn't nearly twice the price.

DSLRs are genuinely bad
only autists and experienced photographers can get any good use out of them
SLRs were fine with negative film because of its 5 stop highlight overexposure lattittude and low resolution. a 20mp digital camera is twice as sharp as 35mm film and makes missed focus from the inherent inaccuracy of SLRs more obvious.

>>4535837
So dslrs are not genuinely bad theyre just bad for filthy casuals?

>someone recreated the thread retconning everything
https://archive.palanq.win/p/thread/4535363/
okay this is dishonest engagement bait then, probably by Canon's marketing team
abandon thread

>>4535839
They're genuinely bad. The design itself has problems (mirror slap, no EFCS to mitigate shutter shock, focus inaccuracy, mirror in way of proper lens designs).

DSLRs are kind of like sony in how technically flawed they are. people still used them, but anyone honest would realize their error and accept better if they had the chance.

>>4535848
>mirror slap, no EFCS to mitigate shutter shock, focus inaccuracy, mirror in way of proper lens designs
non-issues all of them
the real problem with DSLRs is that you can't use the viewfinder while shooting video, and if you're spending north of 2k on a camera it's safe to assume you are an aspiring filmmaker

>>4535849
Ok dogfucker

>>4535848
You sound limp wristed. I don't respect your opinion at all now. Sorry.

>>4535854
You're a Belarusian vatnik

>>4535855
>t. limp wristed schizo
You're a funny one.

>>4535857
You're like a broken record >>4535138

>>4535858
That post is 5 days old bro

>>4535862
>doesn't deny it

>>4535646
Fuji X70.
Only downside I have experience with it is poor battery life, but I have a powerbank.

>>4535863
You're an obsessed schizo that calls everyone who disagrees with you canon. A broken record player..
It's really funny because canon knows exactly how wrong you are kek

>>4535854
>surely if i hold the camera really hard, it won't vibrate
The camera is not a solid mass so it still vibrates

>entire world: mirrorless is better
>/p/: n-no the design flaws of DSLRs are non issues im actually a super muscular gigachad because i spent $400 on a d750

>>4535873
>>4535870
Weird skill issue

>>4535646
SONY α7C II + Tamron 28-75mm F2.8 G2

>>4535646
Nikon Z9 + Nikkor Z 800mm f/6.3 VR S

>>4535646
Mamiya 645 + 75mm f4.5 shift

>>4535646
That depends.
Is you family growing?

>>4535891
Well, OP did say he didn't mind if it was a film camera

File: Ren-Kockwell-Growing-His-(...).jpg (3 KB, 97x124)

3 KB JPG

>>4535894
oh no

>>4535848
>mirror slap
not relevant to a dude buying a camera to snapshit some family photos

>>4536344
>spend hundreds of dollars on a camera, avoiding superior mirrorless because "MUH OVF!"
>live view photos are noticeably sharper than OVF photos
this is especially pronounced on the nikon d750 despite its glowing recommendations (nikon shills just crank the sharpening slider and never notice)

>>4536348
DSLRs can't actually autofocus accurately through the OVF, but mirror vibrations resonating through the camera definitely add on to it.

>>4535848
>>4535870
>>4535873
>>4536348
>>4536353
The words of someone who convinced himself DSLRs suck because he doesn't like the way they look but never even held one nor experienced looking through their viewfinder, let alone shoot anything with them.

>>4535869
Funniest thing is he thinks I'm everywhere and Belarusian lol
He probably has nightmares where I point an 8mm camera to him with a concealed gun inside. And all it took was editing a Minsk IP on a ban screencap and then deleting it, lmao

>>4536358
Who's never really done photography?
https://archive.palanq.win/p/thread/4264405/#4264405
You lol

>>4536358
Nigga you are outnumbered by sane, rational anons who understand that DSLRs are just poor people cameras at this point.
If you want muh OVF then use an SLR. While there's nothing wrong with using one, DSLRs literally have no advantages other than battery life.

>>4536366
The biggest DSLR shill here literally admitted he only uses a 5DII because he's hoarding shekels too hard to risk losing a real camera, and posts backyard shots from a Z7II

>>4536366
>If you want muh OVF then use an SLR
I already do.
>DSLRs literally have no advantages other than battery life.
The OVF itself, ergonomics, no loss of photosites to AF pixels, robustness, etc

>>4536373
He's not the biggest DSLR shill, I am. He's a spineless milquetoast faggot.

>>4536365
Obsessed

>>4536375
Sounds like autistic concerns for a non photographer to theorize about

>>4536377
Non photographers aren't counted. It would be like calling AI an activist. It might output words, but it has no comprehension and its "motivation" is grounded in programming, not material experience.

>>4536377
what a womanbrained comment

File: this-dreamlike-documentar(...).jpg (82 KB, 1200x675)

82 KB JPG

>>4536381
Since all the clues in the world weren't enough I'll help you with a more direct one, stalker. Fire walk with me.

>>4536382
It's been said true art requires getting in touch with the feminine.

Why are you all like this?

>>4536394
Most likely abused as a child.

>>4536373
More people should realize expensive professional cameras aren’t toys to take on dog walks

We are blessed with a deluge of cheap gear that’s still as ruggedized (and as fragile) as the new stuff. Its smart to take advantage of that instead of focusing on crutches like megapixels, IBIS, and 7 stop shadow pushes

>>4536397
The real problem is thinking dog walks are a substitute for real photography. If there's risk but you know the photograph will be worth it, it's easy to take. If you're a decadent westerner that's a slave to a pet you already know no good photographs will come out of it, because you're not going there for the photography. You're going there to walk the dog.
I respect urbexfags a great deal more than the memedog friebd simulator fags on this board.

File: The plot thickens, photgr(...).jpg (205 KB, 1280x1625)

205 KB JPG

>>4536402 >>4536404

>>4536381
>autistic concerns for a non photographer to theorize about
No, they matter. I recently got an S5II to complement my 5DIV and there are a few things I don't like about it. Inferior ergonomics - why would this not matter? The viewfinder can lag in the dark. Also in the way of just shooting. The battery needs to be charged after one day instead of one week. Again, just worse. It doesn't feel cheap but it certainly isn't as tanky as my 5DIV. Not a big deal, but something to keep in mind.

I don't regret the purchase as there are some features I wanted that my 5DIV doesn't have, but the new camera's certainly a downgrade in those areas I mentioned.

If I had to pick ONE camera to stick with, it would probably be the 5DIV. I would miss being able to adapt some old lenses though.

>>4536401
I agree with the overall take but it doesn't cross my mind to replace my DSLR with a mirrorless just like I wouldn't replace my car with an electric.

>>4536399
Whats with you non-whites and your hatred of dogs always masquerading as a redpill? Pet dogs have been a facet of aryan and western eurooean civilization since its inception. You semites, slavs, and other asiatics never developed them, so keep your opinions out of it. Our people have managed fine and surpassed yours, only to stumble when we foolishly trust your races as if you were our own, so clearly pets are fine if not good for us. You’ve done damage to us, the 25,000 years of pet dogs and cats havent.

Snapshitting dilapidated building corners and rocks and leaves isnt a good use of professional equipment either. If you’re not paid to be there take the cheap shit.

>>4536401
You bought a sort of shitty budget camera from a fifth rate brand. An s5 is barely $300 more than a much older 5div on the open market. That says something about its quality.

If you bought a canon r5 (actual equivalent to a 5div) you’d be happy with it. A lumix s5 is on the same tier a consumer sony DSLR was.

File: Still Life (Two Glasses w(...).jpg (147 KB, 421x570)

147 KB JPG

>>4536409

>>4536402
The intention was never to replace my DSLR, but to complement it as I said in my post. The S5II is for adapting certain old lenses that my 5DIV can't work well with or at all. The MILC flange distance and IBIS come in handy for that. If I was only using EF lenses I would see no reason to upgrade, at all.
>>4536404
But I don't want to get an R5, even though I can afford it. For most people, yes, that might have been the better choice. There were specific things I was looking for and the S5II was what I settled on.
I'm happy with the purchase. Everything I listed is also a problem with most mirrorless cameras so I'm not sure I'd be happier with an R5.
Also I don't like the anti-consumer stance Canon took with their mirrorless system. If I was going for a "premier brand" I'd be looking at SNOY or Nikon.

>>4536403
>you non-whites
lol, dumb mutt
>Pet dogs have been a facet of aryan and western eurooean civilization since its inception.
Pet culture is decadent bs, don't mistake work dogs for that.
It is a redpill that if photos are an afterthought and not your motivation to be there they will subpar and likely snapshits instead of real photography.
>>4536404
>If you bought a canon r5 (actual equivalent to a 5div) you’d be happy with it.
He wouldn't.

>>4536407
>The intention was never to replace my DSLR, but to complement it as I said in my post. The S5II is for adapting certain old lenses that my 5DIV can't work well with or at all. The MILC flange distance and IBIS come in handy for that. If I was only using EF lenses I would see no reason to upgrade, at all.
Fair and I see where you're coming from. Adapting lenses is one reason I switched to Canon from Nikon.

File: dogs can have a little be(...).jpg (438 KB, 800x500)

438 KB JPG

>>4536418 >>4536426

>>4536403
Lower trust societies fear pets because they're a virtue test built in to every day life.

The way someone treats a dog is an undeniable testament to their character. The same way you don't know how trustworthy someone is until you drink with them, you don't know someone's true moral character until you know their dog. Dogs stack a second factor onto this - you can't care for a dog if you can't trust the people around you to meet the same standards as you.

For a low trust society it's less scary to them to just neglect dogs outside, even if this results in more dangerous, less socialized dogs that spread more disease and commit more attacks against people (which, to be fair, the people as a whole earn).

File: 6965.jpg (89 KB, 500x435)

89 KB JPG

>>4536418

>>4536408
>"Pet culture is decadent bs"
This is a literal marxist talking point. Congratulations on quoting tikkum olamist manifestos.

Westerners have had pet dogs since our shared ancestors founded the first cities in the middle east. Your inability to continue this tradition says more about you than the dogs, and the lower level of achievement in eastern regions says something about that.

You're not on the right track, you're repeating the copes of a fallen people.

Get your civilization back on its feet soon.

>>4536408
>furry slavoid hates dogs
probably a wolfaboo

>>4536411
>>4536412
>>4536413
Dogs are based as a working animal when you have a farm or you hunt, or as protection if you have a big house with a big land etc.
Having a dog as an urbanite is the most cucked, retarded and hedonistic thing you can do.
Just imagine you need to take a dog two times a day out and pick up his shit with your own hands.
Disgusting and retarded as fuck

>>4536418
>Dogs are based as a working animal when you have a farm or you hunt, or as protection if you have a big house with a big land etc. Having a dog as an urbanite is the most cucked, retarded and hedonistic thing you can do.
Muhammad (the al-zutt one) said this. It's not a native viewpoint in the first world.
>Just imagine you need to take a dog two times a day out and pick up his shit with your own hands.
This is major, major concern in indian and pakistani culture because they attach some sort of weird spiritual purity/honor to cleaning such that a higher caste person isn't even meant to clean up the mess they make because it's "disgusting and beneath them". However, in the first world we don't really have the same aversions since we invented soap, water, plastic bags, etc.

>>4536418
>Just imagine you need to take a dog two times a day out
Anything less than 3 times a day and at least 2 hours total is animal abuse. Dogs are a lot of work and should not be owned by lazy fucks.
>pick up his shit with your own hands
Thirdies will tell me that picking up after a dog through a plastic bag is disgusting but then they'll proceed to wipe their own asses with their bare hands, wash the shit off with cold water and no soap and eat rice off the floor with their fingers.

>>4536424
>>4536422
saar cleaning street shit is dalit work you get bad karma and reduce family izzat saar no pick up after the dog unless you can afford personal dalit saar you act like dalit

>>4536411
>The way someone treats a dog is an undeniable testament to their character
Indeed, it is the mark of a dying civilization when people treat dogs as a child substitute.

>>4536418
Why have kids, when you have to wipe their ass and take care of them?
Catfags are lazy bastards who don't want responsibility. Because there are no expectations for cat owners. Let them shit in other peoples garden. Let them attack their pets. It's as low-effort as it can get.

>>4536422
>>4536424
>>4536425
>>4536428
What a reddit tier take, look your furball puperino is not a kid, not even close.
you have kids for higher pruposes that's why you invest the time and suffer in order to raise them.
Also you don't need to clean the shit or diapers of your kid after around 3 years or even earlier, you in other hand need to massage dog turds 2 times a day with your hands for the next 18 years.

>>4536430
>trying to explain basic things to emotionally gimped dogcucks
Fools errand

>>4536430
>look your furball puperino is not a kid
But who's talking about kids? Where the fuck did that come from?
>kids for higher pruposes
Such as? You were a kid once and look at you. Bitter and sad. Wasting time hating on other people for being happy and owning pets. What higher purpose did you achieve?
>18 years
Man I hope my dog lives that long. One of the best friends I ever had. Motivates me to go outside. Lowers my cortisol levels. Incredible creature.
It's genuinely sad that thirdies lack emotional intelligence to grasp the joy of owning a dog.

Worst board

>>4536434
I agree. Every thread gets ruined by cANON and some other Anonymous Sony/OLPF obsessed asshole. I tried every other photography forum and they all suck in some way. I think photography as a hobby breeds the worst communities for some reason. It's like gaming forums with their console wars but more obnoxious because everyone thinks they are artists and they create art. It's all so cringe man.

>>4536426
Sure, women are insane now. But that doesn't mean we should be savage third worlders like you. Dogs belong indoors with the family. Only savage thirdies have a problem with this. Only savage thirdies can't understand this.

Dogs are not the problem. Institutionalized misandry and mass migration are depressing birthrates. And these are not caused by dogs. If anything, your dog hatred is in the same vein... since it also comes from slavo-semitic culture.

File: SpainUSA.jpg (283 KB, 1354x423)

283 KB JPG

>>4536453

>>4536433
>thirdies
Whiter than you Tyrone. Keep telling people not from your vassal state that they're "thirdies" it will surely improve your situation.

>>4536451
There are no white people who enjoy soccer so it checks out

>>4536438
photography is stereotypically a hobby for snobby losers. if you asked the best writer on earth to sneak a photographer character into his story, they would be a voyeur, a creepy boudoir guy, or a trust fund kid "studying the intersectionalities of texture and mankind's impact of the natural world" taking photos of gravel and leaves

if you're not a loser you're not going to stay "into it", like, you're going to still take some really nice photos with your acquired skills, but you'll fall out of love with the "cool" gear and become increasingly incredulous around people who insist it's fine art as if it's oil painting (to the point that not chasing poverty porn and "story telling" is a waste of shutter clicks) and treat the newest sony/canon/leica like it's the best thing since sliced bread

all communities centered around photography will accumulate losers, especially pseudy ones that engage in vegan-esque cope philosophizing because that's just the kind of thing they have to do to believe they're not wasting their time going without a day job

>>4536471
Your post screams insecure loser lol.

>>4536473
He's mostly right, but he did leave out the biggest demographic in photography:
birdwatchers

>>4536471
Kind of a trvke ngl

Based samefag kek

I always thought photographer was just a job for potheads who can’t show up to a 9 to 5 on time

>>4536495
It is. I work 6-3 so I can schedule clients and still be home before 4:20.

>>4536495
I work in the reserves as a Signaler and it pays well enough for 100 days a year that I can easily do some freelance photog stuff for the fun of it and a couple hundred dollarydoos.

>>4535852
>this camera is too big and the mirror makes noise, I can't sneak out creepshots!
Ok pedophile

>>4535653
RP and V1. Need nothing else.

>>4535653
A lens with IS is indispensable. It doesn't really matter which, but they're basically mandatory for video on the R, RP, and R8.

The upside is lens image stabilizers look way way more natural in video than most IBIS unless you buy a $2000 hybrid made specifically for video over photography

>>4536471
Have you ever worked at a camera shop or lab?
How much time have you spent with local photo groups?

>>4536438
FM is still mostly solid, lots of has photos, much better quality discussion and photos than here

>>4537274
FM?

>>4537345
Fred Miranda the gear marketplace forum