Total slop. If you took my advice and used a do-everything zoom, you would actually be able to see the detail on the people and the cottage

This is why you leave the primes to the pros people!

File: A Rabbit Hunter on a Rive(...).jpg (1.45 MB, 1440x2085)

1.45 MB JPG

>>4537521

>>4537517
>overexposed
>needs more space for the man walking on the path

>>4537520
>>4537517
Weird green tint and wrong white balance, and you're clearly not setting your tone curves in camera because you dont have the skill to shoot jpeg or these would be more realistic and honest. Typical raw editor guesswork.

File: Dante_Gabriel_Rossetti_Wa(...).jpg (128 KB, 810x1028)

128 KB JPG

>>4537523

>>4537517
>no information in her CRUSHED BLACK hair and clothing

>>4537522
lemme guess... canon rp. no dynamic range. and you mirrorless shills say it doesn't matter.

File: 1719378313520594.jpg (3.63 MB, 4500x2888)

3.63 MB JPG

>>4537537

>>4537517
>scene is just too high contrast, too much clipping in the blacks, take at a different time of the day bro

File: Night at Gurzuf.jpg (960 KB, 3000x2247)

960 KB JPG

>>4537526

>>4537517
>some bad GLARE reflected by the water
>busy composition, what are OUR EYES SUPPOSED TO BE DIRECTED TO?
>needs some cropping, lots of unnecessary space!

>>4537525
Should have used a CPL and a long exposure (micro four thirds has better IBIS, fool framer. yeah, i see your HDR)

sharp water just shows you dont know how to use a camera

File: Alexei Savrasov, The Rook(...).jpg (1.08 MB, 1535x2000)

1.08 MB JPG

>the snow is TOO BRIGHT, it is DRAGGING MY EYES DOWN and DOMINATING THE COMPOSITION
>CLIPPING in the dark parts of the tree trunks! can you even METER correctly?

>OP's posts: mad because overexposure
>other posts: actually funny

>>4537521
>Weird green tint
Shouldn't have used a Sony.

File: Sebastian_Pether_(1790-18(...).jpg (99 KB, 1024x800)

99 KB JPG

>>4537517
>the image here is just TOO BUSY. there are TOO MANY SUBJECTS - what am I SUPPOSED TO BE LOOKING AT?
>needs some SEVERE CROPPING

File: 1280px-Las_Meninas,_by_Di(...).jpg (363 KB, 1280x1473)

363 KB JPG

>>4537535

>>4537517
>not enough DETAIL in the SHADOWS
>why so much space at the top? CROP it out

>>4537534
Ok, now it sounds like your screen is broken

This image has a lot of detail in the shadows

>>4537535
>but there's just NOT ENOUGH shadow detail, there COULD BE MORE. some parts of the image have NO TEXTURE. PURE BLACK IS EVIL.

>>4537524
Literally just a snapshot. Learn to compose.

>>4537536
You're just seething about this specifically over and over again. It's getting cringe.

I've never even seen it outside of ken rockwell's blog and that weird jpeg panasonic shill's posts

>>4537538
>YOU JUST DON'T GET IT. CLIPPED BLACKS AND WHITES ARE SIGNS OF THE AMATEUR, THEY JUST RUIN THE IMAGE. LEARN TO HDR IN LIGHTROOM AND GET BACK TO ME CHAMP.

>>4537538
Kek you come across as a bigger whiner than him

You had to post this twice because no one cared the first time