Cartier-Bresson would pay models to pose candid street photography and make videos about it on Youtube these days

>>4527661
Someone put actual effort into making that image. I bet they could actually afford the camera of their dreams if they put that effort into making money. Kek

>>4527665
AI isn't someone. Pay attention and behold all AIs do this.
>Thing: Descriptor, descriptor.
>Statement. Statement. Conclusion.
>It's not A, it's B.
>Excessive sarcasm
>Passive aggressive
>But hey
>Nothing like
>Question? Question? Dismissal.
tldr its a mechanical redditor

>>4527666
Ah I had a feeling it was ai, but it seemed a little too detailed to be 100% ai. I will still laugh at whoever prompted ai to make the image. They are definitely just upset they can't afford one.

File: fujifags.jpg (2.05 MB, 4032x3024)

2.05 MB JPG

>>4527669
It even got wrong aspects of the actual camera, there's no rewind knob on a Leica M (it's digital).
It made a mockery of a Leica, a Fujislug tier contraption.
Pic related is arguably more authentic than what OP posted, a machine forgery not unlike the Moon that Samsung got caught faking.
"Computational photography" and electronic "viewfinders" will blur this line even further, unlike OP people won't know they're being fed AI fabrications.