How to avoid diffraction with my camera?
>>4532880Just don't add a dumb filter
>>4532886who are you calling dumb? retard
>>4532880not that difficulthttps://www.photopills.com/calculators/diffraction
>>4532880Why avoid it
>>4532880Nobody ever in the history of anything has watched a video or looked at a picture and gone>This would be really good but I can see so much diffraction ruining the shot
>>4532920>>4532895sisters there's so much diffraction that you can't even see the sceneI'm getting tires of photographers upping the diffraction, upping the blurriness, upping every defect because it gives "soul" to the imagemore defects makes you a worse cameraman, not a better one
>>4532939>>4532880nigga you don't even know what diffraction is and I can't bother to explain to someone who won't do 1 google search to acquire the minimal context necessary to understand the answer to the question they're askingjust shoot below f11 and there will be no noticeable diffraction for all intents and purposes someone asking this question could have
>>4532942It's clearly a troll thread, he's talking about flare which looks like it was added in post with how uncontrolled it seems.
>>4532948what is a flare? anyway the computer has no way of telling what is and what isn't a light source
>>4533042correct, that’s why all pixels in a photo or video are the same brightness
>>4532948It's just a streak effect filter. Basically a clear filter with parallel lines on it.
buddy has never heard about anamorphic lenses
