Moar?
No one asked so here's another
And another
>>4512312MOAR!!!
>>4512434
An actual macro. I don't know the magnification, but i'm guessing like 2:1 maybe more? Handheld.
Something a little different
>>4512546pretty nice anon desuI just don’t like how the rear branch is out of focus
>>4512547Thanks. I don't mind it personally, but the transition could be nicer. I don't know why it makes the lighter lines next to the branch. Lens is canon "chrome nose" fd 100mm f2.8 I kind of wish the dof would cover the the petals in this one. Oh, well, it's all practice. Maybe I'll have a decent portfolio of 10-15 flower pics by the end of the season.
I ve posted some in the macro generalAnother one. Tamron 90mm. 1x mag
Here is more
Yeah, uhm, ok.
Mind if I post a couple?
Pentax K1000 with some Kodak Gold. 1:2 50mm
>>4512546i like this one, i thought it was a mirror reflection of flowers with a frame on the thumbnail
>>4512858Thanks, yeah, it's kinda hard to decipher. Sun is camera left, but trees block most direct light to the flowers. Apartment building behind the flowers is in full sun and makes an interesting background lights the flowers. Looks weird, but rather pleasing too. Not too happy with the lily of the valley pics I took this year. Not bad, not great.
Does anybody have OC Bougainvillea pictures?
Fuji film point and shoot specifically the zoom date + Colorplus 200
One moar for the road. I like the tiny novoflex bellows and the noflexar 105mm f4 it's such a light weight combo
>>4513677Usecase for the stupidly expensive novoflex bellows?I m looking for bellows for my sony aspc camera to try some extreme macro using microscope lenses150mm for fixed lenses >220mm for infinity corrected lensesNovoflex max elongation 161mmAll that money and unusableAny other cheap but good belows you guys can recommend
>>4513727Oh :D no, not the modern bellows. This old thing.
>>4513727I also have the canon bellows r, but it's not quite that long. Most are not. Just get two sets of bellows or use extension tubes or rig up a tube to add length. This is the bellows R
>>4513727would price or name brand even matter? it just has to be light tight, yes?
>>4513798No, not really. The rails are different and some models are more stable than others. On some models you can move both ends, but I'm not sure how useful that is. They are basically just a tube with an adjustable length. For focusing you will also need a focusing rail. Bad rails are jumpy and difficult to adjust exactly... I know I have a cheap one... And cheap ones are useless for focus stacking. Good rail for focus stacking is not cheap. I think for 2:1 you would need 0.1mm or even less movement between shots. I haven't tried to do that yet so no actual experience.
>>4513798Price matters , brand not really as long as i can use an adapter to sony e.Was looking at wemacro electronic rail and they also have 150mm tubes for reaching 160mm from the sensor. But not more. I could buy extra tubes and shit but bellows would allow me to adjust magnification on infinity ones fastWant 2.5x mag just adjust bellows length accordingly. Want max mag extend the bellows to reach max mag and everything in betweenFucking with 100 extension tubes is not fun in the field, time consuming, and pricey as you would need a ton of extensions tubes to play with lenght
>>4513804The old bellows are all cheap. I paid less than 50€ for the cannon r and 25€ for thr novoflex. You can add tubes to the bellows to add more length.
>>4513836There are long extention tubes too, or youbcan rig one up. You could also add a closeup lens. That way you would retain more light too. IME even with the canon bellows extended all the way the light loss is huge.
This was nearly impossible to print, negative was completely blown out by the sun reflecting from glass pane to the side but I managed to save it with ND filter and 4 seconds exposure. First test print success.
>>45148018x10 crop, didn't feel like wasting more paper on it.
nabbed a bokeh flower and sunset 2-for-1 yesterday>>4512688i dig
>>4514901Noice
my cactus bloomed a few days ago, looked nice for a short while
Thorny Apple Flower
heres some floppy disk flowers
last one
Only just got back into photography after 18 years. Got me a used Nikon D90 (Shutter Count 26k) + 18-105 Kit lens on eBay for like 90 Bucks and it's been very fun so far.I have yet to understand ISO, Aperture, Shutter Speed though.Anyway, some roses.
ooh so pretty.. thread for me, I love flowers. are plebs allowed to post? I only have phone fotos.thinking of buying a D3200 aps-c and an 18-55mm though. can you guys give me tips on how to take good close up flower pictures with a real camera?
Nice thread
Is this the thread?
>>4517482this one caught my eye but they're all cool :-)))I was obsessed with mavicas for a spellthank god I didn't buy one. they're too expensive for what they are.
>>4515627i liekvery cool use of bnw
I like this one because if you look closer you will see that the bugs are fucking.
I've run out of flower pics on my laptop but have more backed up to NAS. I might post more later. We'll see.
Mushrooms are flowers, right?
>>4513234>very fast flower at very high speed
>>4512688Beautiful tree. Even the most amazing human made art is not even half as beautiful as what nature creates and destroys so effortlessly every year.
Old film photo I found.
>>4512616Nice.>>4512685Not super sharp but pretty.>>4514812Overcooked but I like the colors I guess.>>4514901Interesting but also looks fake.>>4522388Spring vibes but negative points for the white frame. It's not a fucking art gallery print. Get real.
>>4515627>>4514801>>4514802Not a huge fan of BW flower photography. To me colors is what makes them beautiful.
>>4529666>It's not a fucking art gallery print. Get real.You seem upset.
