Michael Jackson is number 1
>>132010132That's correct. inb4 longnose tribe seethe.
>>132010132Based on what Michael Jackson actually did, and got away with, combined with everything he accomplished musically, you’re right. He is. That’s the crazy part.
>>132010132The best thing you did was not crop out the source at the bottom.
>>132010132>literally played no instrumentsGay, also Prince mogs him all day.
>>132010132Such a shameless white amerimutt bias. The Beatles are comfortably better than than Elvis or Michael. No mention of any Hip Hop legends. No Van Morrison, Roger Waters, Mark Knopfler.. shit list made by faggots
>>132010447>PrinceNo hooks.
>>132010132This is obviously meant to be a list of greatest musicians, i.e. taking into account influence and cultural importance, not best musicians. Otherwise it needs people like Frank Zappa and Allan Holdsworth.Louis Armstrong should objectively take the #1 spot. All modern popular music is derived from jazz and he made jazz what it is. MJ can take second place.Many other strange omissions. Georgio Morodor and Wendy Carlos need to be included.I assume the Beatles were included by mistake, because otherwise where are Kraftwerk and Black Sabbath (objectively greater bands than the Beatles)?
>>132010955>Led Zeppelin owe everything to Jigaboo Jackson who tied a shoelace to a stick in 1915Lol you did the meme
>>132012398No. Zeppelin would get a place if this was a list of bands.
>>132010132this is the most AI generated chart ever
Too much death bias
>>132010223based pedophile defender
>>132012533denounce the talmud
>>132012522The first jazz recording was made by whites. Louis Armstrong turned it from a novelty act into something with enduring popularity. Objectively great musician.
>>132010896>no hookshttps://youtu.be/iSKoc0Y325k
>>132010132>Madonna #11.Ok bye.
>>132012484too much recency biasbeyonce before tina turner?meh
>>132010132Rolling Stones is such a normie magazine but at the same so detached from the reality of music and music making. Why does it even exist and who reads it? It's just trolling professional musicians at this point.
>>132012766100% thisRolling Stone Magazine hasn't been relevant since 1990https://youtu.be/6I-A5hw6TtI?is=0X-R4dXySkbAALTZ
>>132012727honestly, surprisingly highher early stuff is actually goodthen she carried the pop diva image through the 90s into the 2000sthat stuff is meh-ish, but shes a household pop namealso, the beatles ultimately snatching up 4 slots is just... stupidask a mathematician to devise a new ranking schema
>>132010132Amy Winehouse makes the list, but Ariana Grande and Lady Gaga do not???Also why is Freddie Mercury separated from QueenAlso The Who and The Rolling Stones are absent despite the Beatles getting quadruple recognition Fuck aiand Fuck Rolling Stone Magazine
>>132012597based pedophile defender
>>132012816I'm not an expert in Madonna but there is no way she is a better than Ray Charles and many others that are below her in the list. She is very popular and successful yes but in terms of talent she isn't that great. For example you can dislike Michael Jackson but nobody can deny he had a lot of talent to sing and dance.
>>132010955Walter Carlos
>>132012852youre right that, musically, jackson was waaaay more talented, but madonna is a talented image artistthese lists are just... too unreflected, particularly with the weight they carrybut a cynic might argue theyd want to keep it that way
>>132012533>>132012832MJ never diddled kids. The jews wanted his share of Sony. When he refused to sell they accused him of pedo. When thay failed they had his doctor kill him.
>>132012784>Rolling Stone Magazine hasn't been relevant since 1990*1980
>>132015184based pedophile defender
>>132012398Why do incels get so upset that Black people did things?
>>132010955Why is Bob Marley below Mariah Carey then? It’s a shit list made by gay millennial faggots
>>132010132Rating Frank Sinatra above David Bowie is kinda based but I think it's wrong
>>132010132Laughable. Drizzy won. Drake One.
Indeed.Michael Jackson is the smoothest..
>>132015800>Why is Bob Marley below Mariah Carey then?Because it's not completely ignoring musical ability. Bob Marley wins on cultural impact but Mariah Carey is objectively the best female singer on this chart.
>>132012398This lol
>>132010249>ROLLING STONE MAGAZINEoof
Rolling Stone Fagazine thinks Eminem is a more talented MUSICIAN than John Coltrane? Really?
>>132010132>Madonna is her underwearkek
>>132015954He did win. By losing a battle, that’s the hard the sad part. Ya’ll couldn’t even kill off Drakes soft ahh. You’re all pathetic.
where is Oasis?
>>132015800I don't know why either Marley and Carey are in that list
>>132010132Adele, BeyonceAretha FranklinBuddy HollyMarvin GayeJanis JoplinJohnny MarrAmy WinehouseTupacthis is a joke, right?
>>132010132I just hate music.
>>132010955frank zappa is horrible lol
>>132010955>Louis Armstrongwasn't he the very first CIA industry plant?
>>132010132>almost nothing but American pop slopLol!
