[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
4chan
/gd/ - Graphic Design

Name
Options
Comment
Options


Gimmicks


PEE text
My Bans
Verification
File

    08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
    05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
    10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
    [Hide] [Show All]


    Janitor applications are now open. Apply here!




    File: frutiger.jpg (174 KB, 736x1308)
    174 KB JPG
    Sorry if this is not the correct board, but it seems the most fit one for the matter.
    my question is, how do you analize an style? how do you put it in a certain category?
    I often see patterns, maybe geometric or color pattern that gives a game, a picture or whatever a certain vibe.
    for example, I know this picture style is known as frutiger aero. I can see the glossy stuf, the transparencies... I lived through it back in the 00's.
    I could see these things, but didn't knew it was called frutiger aero.
    >>
    since you immediately came crashing in with this as a subject, frutiger aero is not a real style of the time, it is a contemporary piece of nostalgia
    in general art is always derivative, all art is using other people's references (or referencing the world) and other people's styles, taking what you like and filling in your own ideas into them. this means that there are certain movements, certain things people like to copy, certain novel combinations of ideas that people then copy, and this is what is studied and made into meaning "styles"
    the style you're talking about is one that was mostly made through the novelty of being able to apply humanist character to user interface design; before then, it was impractical to give user interfaces glossy icons and borders because rendering those in real-time was not feasible. when technology started allowing it, people flocked into the new grounds and often sort of overdid it
    this is also why flat UIs later overtook, mobile phones and laptops brought in screens with massively different scaling factors, meaning that you'd have to create a bunch of copies of all your nicely-rendered glossy UI. in comparison, vector graphics had become performant enough and solved this issue by design, at the cost of being usually very flat. that push was mostly started by the excellent Matias Duarte who did design for Android at the time, designing Holo design, which then kicked off Apple to do the same. the interesting thing is that where Holo went into a more industrial grotesk design, Apple decided to keep their humanist ideas, and that's what won out in the end (Matias then pivoting to Material Design which was a humanist rendition of Holo's ideas)
    right now we live in pretty exciting times in UI land actually, where computers have become powerful enough to do arbitrary non-rectangular layouts, and the grip of humanist design has started fading drastically
    BTC
    bc1qtm4rep7kyp2p28hlkfktpnd0j7uew47vnt2mev
    LTC
    ltc1q9xlaysse0mpfwf025esd69kt9zu3md22gh23du
    ETH
    0x6abA18D203520c8F90ca63eE7426a7bC345D98e6
    SOL
    E5ekoiauCR8yiNp451dmuPzhUxo84P5x3m9WJBK5kxZe
    XRP
    r3jYXNdMk2Vz5hXhKCKE9re8uz93JQFG1r
    DOGE
    DSBq5jRWkiwmEh1G7zBwmQDgRkvRr61fmb
    XMR
    85CTwq5wGjWZw5GgzgwZPrHyZxpLXMK5oZSSSk5j4x9w1bpqzisaWAUZYaAPfh6rP2MZJcaFqF1XmEzkw6YCqJSS2Txu6Z8




    Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
    [Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

    [Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

    All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.