Anyone got a log-in or know how to download high res for free please? Thanks in advance. Pic unrelated.
lol kidthere is no free
>>464285You just gave a FREE (You) to the OP, "KID". Off you go.
>>464286holy shit youre an idiot.its getty images. they sell images. there is no free. its literally what they do.
>>464283Just use AI
>>464293 I wish we could dislike 4chan posts
>>464289Funny how those that are so quick to throw insults are often the most ignorant. I've used free pictures from Getty lots of times in the past. Getty often grant unrestricted logins (any size downloads, no watermark) to advertising agencies and design companies* because they know said agency will pay for any pictures they use commercially. This practice allows those companies to quickly and easily use the images for pitches and mockups etc. I haven't got that luxury at the moment because where I work at now doesn't use many stock images and I didn't want to go begging to ex-colleagues but it looks like I might have to.*With due respect, I suggest that maybe you would know that, if you worked in the industry.
>>464283You can upscale images.Guess I forget that graphic designers aren't used to staying up to date on technology, but if you're in this field, you ought to.The fact that you can do this is fucking unreal. This was like a law of physics that you could scale down, but not up, since the advent of images on computers. But no longer.
>>464302Thanks anon. I've used it a bit but not for a while, so yeah, it's bound to have improved. I had a little play with the firefly feature in potatoshop. It didn't do too badly 2bh. Unfortunately there was some type on the picture, which got turned into that giveaway AI slop type, which I solved with an overlaid a layer that I rezzed up the old way and unmasked the type onto it. What I couldn't solve nicely was getting rid of the watermark (cleanly enough).Oh well. I'll have to ask around for a login.
aren't the watermarks supereasy to edit out by design so that getty can sue for BIG BUCKS everytime a dumbass uses those images comercially?
>>464317What's the technique?
>>464289imgur is an option
>>464295reddit mentality, you should try going there instead>>464293(you)'re still a faggot thoughbeit
>>464337I only use mainchan
>>464283Try unsplash or pexels.unsplash is more no nonsense, pexels requires you to have an account. just manage your expectations.
>>464339All of the halftoned graphics are from unsplash with a halftone filter applied.Unsplash are okay enough for amateur work (like picrel).
>>464283>https://gettyimages-downloader.beatsnoop.com/
>>464283She's so hot!
>>464340numbers arent god dumb ass. leonardo was wrong and you are wrong.
>>464382Doesn't work.
>>464305Not sure which feature you're using, but it doesn't sound like proper upscaling. Use the upscaler in PS if you have access to it. You can upscale with local models as well, but if you're struggling on this, you're not ready for that.Point is, upscaling will not garble up text. Sounds like whatever you're using is regenerating an image based on an image, not upscaling.Upscaling is a process that scales up your exact image, and using AI smoothens out the lossy areas.
>>464305>Same anon as >>464400Notice in the upscaled (4x) image of yours that I posted. There's no damage done to the text on her shirt.
>>464283the only option is to download a low resolution version of the image you want with some of those websites that remove watermarks and then upload it to an image search engine so you can find a high resolution version that some random website uploaded for free. it works most of the time
