I told my friend it's not cheating if she witholds sex for more than a month and you get it from somewhere else. He got pissy about it. The fuck was his problem? I simply stated something that is logical.
>>35046387It still is cheating, since you are operating under deceit and lies.
It is cheating. Its you not putting in the effort to fix your relationship and fucking other people instead
>>35046395>operating under deceit and lies.The fuck does this even mean. She knows what she was doing and what the outcome will be.
>>35046422So it's the man's fault now? If an argument has been happening for a month it means negotiations failed. But withholding sex just to get what you want is manipulative and the outcome is obvious.
>>35046441If you are the type of person to fuck someone else at the first sign of trouble, then yeah, it probably is your fault
>>35046441In the sense that you're responsible for your own actions, yea. I don't know anything about you or your life, but your relationship probably didn't turn to shit because you did everything right.
>>35046479It didn't. I have always been upfront about things. No pussy footing. I have problems sure but I am open about them when necessary.I simply told him that the needle isn't moving and she is using sex to get what she wants. If you cave in, you're always gonna be a loser and she will use the same shitty strategy.Women don't listen to words they listen to action. I said, any woman is game. It's the logical conclusion to her actions.
>>35046387> I simply stated something that is logical.I spent about 3 years in a sexless "relationship".I was a fucking idiot.When the sex stops, and it usually does. Just move on. It's just a sign that the relationship is over.
>>35046387True bro
>>35046423She thinks she is in a committed monogamous relationships with you, since that was the agreement. There was never any clause defining that cheating is allowed if there's no sex.
I mean it's cheating but it's more understandable. Are they married or just 2 losers on ssris and birth control who are not moving toward anything productive?
>>35046387I am highly concerned for zoomies and their sense of logic.OP confuses making what he considers to be a reasonable claim with a logical one. But the number of days, one month, is arbitrary. Some guys might say two weeks or 3 months or 102 days but the point would remain the same that denying the sex means you go get it somewhere else. A conclusion that you deem to be fair and reasonable is not necessarily a fully logical extension of anything. If this were a logical conclusion then there’d be a defensible number of days of sex denial before cheating becomes “not cheating”.
>>35046479>your relationship probably didn't turn to shit because you did everything right.holy killshot batman
Break up/divorce instead of trying to justify cheating
>>350470681 month is defensible especially in this economy.
>>35047709One month is defensible on what grounds? Why specifically that number and why would that number stand as a generality?
>>35048205Because of the economy like dude alrdy said, cuh
>>35048205Dating someone costs money. A retard will waste money on a woman that doesn't love them or is being manipulative.Also 1 month is 30 days. 30 days is more than enough time for dealing with someone's BS, especially if they're not blood related.
>>35046395exactly cheating = its in the name. XD>>35046387I like your machiavellian attitude and lack of accountability. Sadly but I suspect thats what it takes to truly make it in this pseudo-hellish realm.You simply sound like a woman, and that is wise. They are more evolutionary adapted to back stabbing culture.Type of dude who would cheat on a test because questions were too hard. Who would bring a gun into a fist fight because he is victim weight. etc.While I do not condone it, I recognize the modern world seems to favor it. While the heroic honorable men fade into legend.It is what it is.
>>35046387And how did you arrive at one month mr logical? Is it because you're just brown and not logical at all?
>>35048262You are describing being fair and reasonable but not making any better of a case for exactly one month than when you started.If this were going to be a logical conclusion then the number of 30 days would have a highly specific reason based on the rest of the argument. But again, your argument doesn’t change if you turn that one month into 27 days or 2 months. It’s still the same argument because the length of time doesn’t have a logical base within your argument to begin with.I’m not even telling you that you’re wrong to think this way in general, I’m just saying that this is not logical in the way you seem to think it is. I don’t even know why I’m trying to explain this to you because you clearly do not understand the relationship between logic and reason.
>>35047089Holy fucking reddit tranny!
>>35046387(you)it is cheating, duh.Break up with them first then date someone else.
>>35046469>>35046479Enough of this fucking bullshit. There are so, so many relationships where the man puts in 100% and the woman just gets bored and either leaves or checks out mentally and stops putting out. It's not always the man's fault and if you think that way then you're emasculated, you're literally nutless.
>>35046587>>35047068>>35047191I'd agree that leaving is more morally correct but this is the big 26, dude. For the average single dude, dating has become more or less hopeless. You need every leg up you can get, and truly pre-selection is one of the biggest you can get. Every guy who's gotten a girlfriend has experienced the frustration flurry of female attention you get right after you lock something down, being taken just makes you more attractive to women. And that's literally all on women, it's female nature, men are not responsible for that whatsoever.As long as you're committed to leaving there's nothing wrong with monkeybranching. Women do it to men all the time, why should they get better treatment from us?
>>35049574Female accountability is the next step in human evolution. We aren't there yet.
