EVERYTHING is me. Everything. There is nothing that isn't me. In fact, I am literally nothing. No thing. And nothingness is simultaneously everything. I am God. I am me. The most important thing to realize is that what I fundamentally am, is me. And this "me" is EVERYTHING. I am the fabric of reality. The totality. So everything is ultimately just me. There is no separation. The cosmic joke.
>>43153435Ok now make sure to pay your taxsMoney not even being real just a concept agreed upon
>>43153435but I am ME, you CAN'T be ME. You are YOU
>>43153478https://youtu.be/pGhwBFYtn1s
>>43153478I am me, and I am you.
>>43153607We're all one consciousness.
>>43153435when you grow up you'll learn that you need to negotiate these things rather than telling them and you need to use adult words instead of making a slide thread
>>43153624REAL knowledge. Stuff like solipsism, is just known. I don't need to be convinced. I'm not here to convince anyone. I'm just stating the truth. All is one, one is all.
>>43153700Who are you arguing with
>>43153435No reality is a disease that is trying to kill me and must be purged. It is a mistake.
>>43153435Yeah we are definitely one...
>>43153435baby's first "i am the demiurge" soliloquy
>>43153700you can say that things just come to you but if you follow up with >I'm just stating the truth I'm gonna say you're trying to convince people>I'm not trying to convince anyone>I'm just stating the truthlollWhat was the point of this thread again? Arguing with yourself?
>>43153851Actual god here not a faker like you guys we all know it’s for my a muse mentv
Whenever a post about solipsism comes up, I always ask this question, but since I've never seen a proper answer, I'll ask it againIf solipsism is true, why do unpleasant events happen, or why are there things cannot do?Have you received an A+ on every single exam? Have you never once been scolded by your parents, teachers, or bosses? Have you never been unable to buy something you wanted because you lacked the money? Have you never been rejected by a woman you desired?Just as an author can do anything within their work, if solipsism is true, that sole consciousness should be capable of anything.Whether it’s an unpleasant boss, getting bad grades on an exam, or a woman rejecting himnone of these things should happen to that sole consciousness.For the record, some people use "solipsism" to mean that all life or souls are fundamentally one, but that is not solipsism. That is closer to nondualism or the oversoul.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nondualism
>>43153435I've had such a revelation while tripping balls on LSD, and I suppose it is beautiful in a way and tragic in others. Perhaps if the illusion of separation is sufficiently great, it is functionally as if it was true? Like I write this as a response to you, but are we truly one? Even if on some metaphysical level we are, in all actuality we are separate. We do not function as one, even if we perhaps have this interaction. I guess what I am trying to say, it feels like a really profound realization but it in fact changes nothing.
life is super-deterministic and you have no free will. case closed.
Solpisism is the false Monism. Greek Monism is the false Monism. Luciferian Gnosticism is the false Monism. The true Monism is analyzing Christ's words from a Trismegistic angle. Everything else is well-poisoning horseshit trying to confuse you, like OP for example. Everything at base is connected, and one, which makes all things genuine in their lower manifestation and makes all situations and actions and things all the more important. To devalue everything and turn within is selfishness. To value everything and to use what you find within to make everything better is selfessness. Solipsism is a Luciferian lie people tell themselves to excuse vain or cruel actions. Solipsism is Christianity minus personal accountability and love.
>>43153435so uh...what drug did you use in order to gain such an original insight, and how much of it?
>>43154412700ug of LSD
>>43154501>acid revelationsvery original :|
>>43153435>Solipsism is the truth.Lol, I didn't even have to read your thread. It is all wrong.
solipsism is le heckin truebut actually
>>43154140My thoughts on this have always been that we are currently in a form of existence where we have created an 'addiction to reality'. You "can" make everything go your way, but to do see need to fight against insane urgers and responses dictating you can't. How can anyone say they have the power to do anything when the entire world is so independently operated and run? Its not even a matter of just basic "I believe" but almost like a fight against your habitual thoughts that you've cultivated after living your whole life here. Its all self imposed rules you've become so crazily accustomed too that its agony to get out off. Mastering it is pure discipline and focus, not relaxation and exploration like most meditation kind of nonsense says. I've always thought of this life for me as being simply the first, the tutorial to create myself and my thoughts and ideas. Hence I needed a world that felt 'automatic and external' that I could just learn from as a bystander. That's why it sucks as I'm still in the back of my mind playing as the bystander and just can't seem to get that away from those habits and routine thoughts to go back to being creator mode. But I think in death it'll happen anyway so I'm not worried.
My opinion is, ultimately, this. One is all, all is one.It may sound like word salad but that's all there is to it. Duality is an illusion.
>>43153435Source?
>>43155652That’s not word salad. It’s just plain ignorance. You could say all WERE one. Perhaps even that it’s possible for all to merge into one at some later point. But to say it today is patently absurd.
>>43154140You ask pretty dumb questions for being such a long winded reddit spacing smartass>why do bad things happen in books and movies, why don't we use our imagination strictly for nice warm fuzzy things like baby animals and cotton candy and shiet
Solipsism is obviously true if you think it through. Who are you talking to? Yourself.
>>43153435OK well you're about to have a wank in a few minutes. Hope you enjoy it.
>>43153851I reckon OP is just starting to get the hang of it. Talking about it helps anchor the feeling. Cut him some slack, Jack.Me, I've actually had the experience of looking at other people and knowing it was "me" inside them.That is to say: the feeling of me being me is the same as the feeling of you, being that which you call "me". Punctuation purely for parsing purposes.Also one other time, I felt like a kernel of corn on the cob, and all the other kernels were other "me"s, and we all shared a core, which was that me-ness, but we all at the same time had our individuality, which was formed by our unique set of experiences and the variations of the bodies we used to live these "lives".And I wasn't even high, either of those times. Though I doubt I would have been able to appreciate those experiences if I hadn't done a lot of acid and mushrooms back in the day.
>>43155736Not new info. Sages have been telling us for literally thousands of years.https://youtu.be/KgzQuE1pR1w
>>43155669One in essence, one in origin, one in destination.In all the ways that really matter, we're still one.https://youtu.be/-gPFxMHWV8w
>>43155771>one in essence Why are you being a nominalist? Can you seriously not distinguish between varying expressions of choice?>one in originWhy are you defining yourself as an object created and not an individual creating yourself?>one in destinationMassive leap and totally blind assumption. Where did you get this idea from? Your ass?
>>43155812>Why are you being a nominalist? Can you seriously not distinguish between varying expressions of choice?You claim I'm being a nominalist, when I'm simply using the largest frame of reference available to me. At that scale, varying expressions of choice are almost inconsequential (almost, because those choices do shape our individuality, which always remains).>Why are you defining yourself as an object created and not an individual creating yourself?You made the decision to interpret my words that way. I had no such intent. I am one with the local Creator, and the "me" inside me is the same as hers/his/its "me". Therefore, I did create myself. In fact I created many, many of myself.>Massive leap and totally blind assumption. Where did you get this idea from? Your ass?You call it an assumption, but it's nothing so grand as that. It's merely an observation. You, as a being who is one with the infinite, can't escape the infinite. You might not like being infinite, so living here is a good fit for you. This is the realm of limitation. Normally, we're here temporarily. Due to eternity being non-time-based, you can live here "forever", and never have to address your true infinite nature.
>>43155840So you’re a near nominalist. To say we’re of “one essence” and almost entirely downplay choice completely removes any meaningful distinction between choice based actions. You realize it’s a sneaky trick to say “I am one with” the creator correct? Why do you naturally say that and not “I am”. And it is an assumption. You have no way of knowing. You’re so broad in saying you remain within infinity it means nothing. It’s like saying we’ll all end up on earth so it’s the same. And why are you using the word “we”? Isn’t it only you. The absolute state of Brainrot.
>>43155840Yet more proof solipsism is massive cope. A hug box lmao.
that means i fucked myself
>>43153720me
