I know a decent bit about gnosticism, but I get all the different schools confused. What's a good resource beyond just reading wikipedia?
>>43145423Looking at the symbols of things and thinking about it. Truth is self discovered. The human is a pattern recognition machine. All you need for "gnosis" is right in front of you. Always has been.
Once you see it you can't unsee the machinery
>>43145423we mostly just have a bunch of collected works from the nag hammadi, hellenistic gnosticism is mostly that and speculation
The other God by Yuri StoyanovThe gnostic religion; the message of the alien God and the beginnings of Christianity by Hans JonasTree of gnosis by Ioan Couliano
>>43145423Is Abraxas supposed to be the demiurge? What is he?
>>43145423At the end of the day, this is the only truth:https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/1wr31t6/the_truth_once_and_for_all/You're welcome.
Historical gnosticism is pretty much just a few half rotten scrolls and the records of their debates with the early catholics. Anything beyond that is a larp and probably french
>>43145423>GnosticismNag Hammadi? I never really bothered.
>>43145423>learn about the different schools of GnosticismI'm unaware if these cover that.>a good resourceWhile I haven't read it all, it seems solid.>>29324261https://archive.4plebs.org/x/thread/29324261>Gnosticism is the only way outhttps://web.archive.org/web/20141018002554/http://www.equilibrauk.com/equillibra-articles/
