i dont get why eu5 is so hated on 4channel.comthis is the first paradox game in over a decade that's reversed the trend of simplifying and casualizing their games, as such i love it, i love the interconnected mechanics, i love popmaxxing, i love prosperity spamming, i love production efficiency, i love managing control and proximity, this game is truly great to me and the first time i've felt positively to the direction paradox are moving in since heart of darkness was releasedyes, i don't like the lack of railroading, i hate megakyiv, mongol iraq, victorian mamluks, but these are simply balance changes, for example stuff like courts being full of injuns and china never reunifying has been fixed (though 1.4 seems to have partially fucked china again)also a lot of the patches have been absolute dogshit, bricking the game, and show severe incompetence, but they tend to get hotfixed pretty quicklythe dlcs so far have been pure powercreep crap, which is poor and not a good thingbut mechanically the game is still good, and 1.4 seems to be moving positively, nerfing the infinite food and optimal urbanization meta, and the new trade orders make trade actually fun to interact with instead of just automate and forget itwhat i'm asking is which of these is the correct assessment of the situation:1. The people complaining are seething EU4 blobbers mad this isn't EU4:22. The people complaining are mad for legitimate grievances, like the ones i outlined3. I simply have no taste, enjoy playing cookie clicker slop, and am retardedD. All of the aboveplease help me im not used to not having people who share my opinion reassuring me im right about everything
I’m waiting for the devs to stop flailing back and forth because they have no vision for the game, before I bother to play it.
>>2501519I havent played it I wont play it until its goodI know its not good because the average paradox game takes about 5 or 6 years to become playable
Great AI post unfortunately I am reporting it for spam
>>2501519You forgot brokies with potatoes.But it's mostly blobbers being mad at the war system being too different. Like in V3. So not only do they want toy soldiers, they always to smash them together a lot.
>>2501657>YOU ARE A BROKIE WITH A POTATO AND A CHILD IF YOU WANT SOLDIERS AND YOU WANT THEM TO SHOOT AT EACHOTHER!!!Why don't you try picking a real life hobby instead of playing video games lmaoYES I am a child who wants to smash his digital toy soldiers together. A LOT. YES I want a war system that actually works. Cry more.
>>2501672But I'm not crying? I got the EU I wanted. EU4 still exists, and you can fuck off and go back to it?
If blobbers had any skill, they'd be playing Age of Empires 2.
>>2501674CRY BROWN LMAO
Better an accomplished brown, than a manchild ""white"". (swarthy mutt)
LMAO HE ADMITTED HE'S FUCKING BROWN
>>2501681oooooooooof
>>2501681gonna need a fact check on this one
literally nothing worked at intended on launch...
>>2501672>>2501674>>2501681>>2501686Paid to de-rail the thread award.Argument doesn't even make sense, EU5 has better toy soldiers than every grand strategy other than HoI.
>>2501519they promised interesting historical events with no railroading and reworked things like the 30 years war to be less railroady and all of it completely shit the bed and they have no idea how to fix it
>>2501519I want it to be kino so badly but the performance is shit and many things like situations are still broken. Maybe in 10 years when a modder optimizes the game because lord knows pdx would never spend manhours making their jeet spaghetticodebase run better
>>2501519it does a shit job at simulating early modern europe. Portugal and spain should want to colonize because the ottomans shut down the silk road trade, france should want to expand into italy because of the habsburg family slowly strangling it to death. There should be constant crusades against the ottomans by most of eastern europe in attempts to kick them out of the balkans. Instead a bunch of random shit happens and its boring
>>2501519The game is simply just bland.
>>2501519>i dont get why eu5 is so hated on 4channel.comGo ask them?
Why the fuck does everyone bitch about the performance, it only crashed ONCE months ago on my machine.
EU5 is not good yet, in fact it never will be
>>2501519It's way too slow (it takes painfully long to do anything in this game), time consuming and the devs don't know what the fuck they are doing with the game and keep changing everything every patch and it seems that they fucking hate the player since they keep putting multiple limitations on them, making the gameplay experience tedious and torturous. I went back to EU4 and I haven't touched this garbage in months so I don't know how it is now but from the looks it looks like they made pop growth be shittier so hooray, you can't even play tall now.
>>2505908Try M&T lil bro
They are still brownpandering albeit a bit less.
>>2501519Yeah too late, multiplayer babies cries to johan and its getting reverted into middle child of a divorce. Pop growing is dead, daily ticks are back, retarded nothingburgers from decisions are back. Luv me some eu4.5 edition. Its only worse from here and everyone will love it and post their shit youtube video on how much they suck johan cock that they are turning back to eu4 pisswater sea.
Got tricked into thinking trade range was fixed in 1.4.1, but it's not. All of Europe can still buy and sell from India with no penalties as soon as they discover them. Because of that there's no way to control trade as an intermediary.Maybe I could take control of the market centers in India and set export tariffs?
>>2506420Was wondering if I was missing a single goddamn thing and I am not. Thank you, King, for playing the actual game so that we can all avoid wasting our time again.
