>>4128407
>What is /vrpg/ expecting out of Final Fantasy XVII?
Nothing at all, because I dropped Squaresoft when X-2 came out.

>>4128407
An outlet for gooks and failed men to age regress and pretend they’re heroes, for the XVIIth time.

>>4128415
Square hasn't been the same since they merged with Enix and became Square Enix. From XII onward, mainline Final Fantasy slowly and gradually became an Action RPG series, culminating in XVI essentially being Devil May Cry with RPG mechanics.

>>4128428
I prefer that over that abomination the FF7 Remake is. Tried to combine both sides and turned out like this. At least FF16 was fun to play.

>>4128407
idk wtf this company is anymore and don't really care

>>4128407
Not speaking for /vrpg/ but I want Turn based combat back.
Tactical, 3D, environments matter, choices and consequences matter.
Pipe dream for sure.

>>4128407
if it is made by Yoshida and Ishikawa then it will be yet more slop

>>4128645
>Tactical, 3D, environments matter, choices and consequences matter
These have literally never been features of FF

>>4128676
What if there were a tactical 3d game which modeled the environment and positioning?
It could be called like FF:Tactics or something
Your last point is far though, the stories are generally linear and on-rails with no choices to be made

>>4128407
they should, like, stop with final fantasy and start properly named projects, this is ridiculous, "final fantasy" does not carry much confidence these days

>>4128407
I hope for something close to FF7 remake combat, with a playable and customizable party. But mostly I'm just excited to see what they come up with this time.

>>4131260
This is pretty likely I think. There's also a chance they'll drop real time combat entirely and go back to turn based. I expect they'll be looking at games like BG3 and Clair Obscur for inspiration.

>>4128691
Thats a spinoff game, has no bearing on what to expect from a mainline title. You are disingenuous.

>>4128407
I'll be dead before it's out so I don't give a shit.

>>4131499
>You are disingenuous
Why so serious?

>>4128407
I don't know but i do know that Square has to decide on whether they pander to ARPGfags, MMOfags, and ATBfags next game.
It's going to be ARPG though because the Remake hack hinted he's working on the next project.

>>4131253
Well, you say that, I'm not ever going to buy another Bravely Default title ever again after the cringe they pulled per game

>>4132965
Action-Combat MMORPG, for sure

>>4128407
There was a 16?

>>4132984
If true, I hope I can actually enjoy it. No matter how hard I tried, I could never really get into FF14, and I've enjoyed City Of Heroes, Phantasy Star Online, golden age WOW, Guild Wars 1, and Guild Wars 2.

File: ff27.png (239 KB, 386x451)

239 KB PNG

>>4133042
>There was a 16?
Anon, I... you've been in a coma. We've been trying to contact you all these years. This is the only way we can reach you. Wake up, please.

>>4128407
I wish the Bahamut will have multiple cool forms like FF7