3>1>2
>>4084949Shove off, kid
>>4084949Kurwa
>>4084959>>4085029>most people rejected his message>they where angry with op because he spoke the truth
>>4085087https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YPTS4TF1ygU
>>4084959>>4085097>option to "shove" djikstra>gerald straight up snaps his leg in two piecesGLASS HIM
>>40849491 > 3 > 2 actually
anyone not saying 3 is the best is just trying to be a contrarian and hate on something that is popular
>>4085365or perhaps it's someone who actually likes RPGs, this is the RPG board after all
>>4084949What are the best and most mandatory mods for the first game? I want it to look great and have a good time. But the more I do research about the mods, the more I'm concerned about stability and conflicts between them. So many comments scare me away saying this or that don't work etc. Game crashes too often etc.Any help?
>>40849491 >> 2 >> 3TW3 is just a ubisoft game.
>>4085097>2-minute video>1 full minute of the main menuMuch appreciated, anon.
>>4085372Learn to use capitals before you mix with the adults, sonny.
>>4085383Literally the only mod you need is to uncensor the cards. What even else is there? The whole game is already a mod for NWN1
>>4085471What is this crap?Want a thrashing?
Blood & Wine > 2 >Heart of Stone > 1 > 3Fags who hate 2 never learned positioning for backstabs OR understood that Vigor affects sword damage. At full Vigor, you deal 100% damage with swords. At no Vigor, you deal 50% damage with swords. Witcher 2's combat punished sign- and dodge-spamming with Vigor. That meant players needed to fight intelligently, rely heavily on oils, potions, and bombs, and actually prepare and play like a Witcher. Too many retards just didn't have the brains to play 2 competently, which is why we have the dogshit combat in 3.Let me be clear: If you hate Witcher 2's combat, then you're directly responsible for how shit 3's combat is.
>>4084949Your mother sucks dwarf cock
>>4085859Posts you can hear
>>4085859>>4085975Lmao!
>>4084949You're not wrong.
>>40849493 is the best.2 is meh, it has good story but the gameplay is very clunky.1 is unplayable, i dropped it after 10 hours and went to youtube to watch the story.1 has this boring combat where you just click the mouse when you see the mouse icon on the screen turn red, its really shitty and cheap.It also looks the ugliest, its so ugly and hideous. But i like the soundtrack in 1, especially the menu theme.2 has this clunky souls wannabe combat, the enemies are boring and poorly designed, the kraken for example is a boring fight that doesn't feel satisfying. 2 improves the minigames and tries to add better side quests but they still feel mediocre.however the best thing about 2 is that its divided into regions instead of open world, but the regions are not well designed sadly. they are filled with nothingness.3 is the best, easily the best combat and presentation in the whole series, the side quests at their bests, the main story is meh but the expansions make up for it by having good main quests. 3 is a huge improvement over 1 and 2, but even 3 has room for improvement, sadly the devs are still insisting on open world games and cinematics.
>>4086164>dropped it after 10 hours and went to youtube to watch the storyFortunately, I didn’t need 10 hours to decide to drop your post, and stopped reading here
>>4086167You should drop your life and hang your worthless existence next.
>>4085659>players needed to fight intelligently
>>4085659Dude your taste is shit, just fuck off already. Nobody cares about your shit taste. You will not convince people, so accept it or go and slit your throat.
>>4085365I have never had the slightest desire to replay 3, while I did replay 1 at one point. Although I think I quit after the swamp.
>>4084949All fine, but rs3 remake has a trailer out and it's not half bad...
>>4085396I don't remember anymore but weren't the mechanics actual fun in w1?
>>4084949>Redditslop 3 > Redditslop 1 > Redditslop 2
>>4087279You are a retard with shit taste
>>4087661>You are a retard with shit tasteFirst day on /vrpg/?
>>4087662No, first day of romancing saga 3 trailer online but 4channers blow oot cock
>>4084949Other way around
>>40881752 is most certainly not the best.
>>4088188It is the best one by far
>>40849492>3>Gwent>1
Daily reminder that namefags are cancer.
1 is my favorite. Great atmosphere, doesn't feel like a desperate attempt at AAA development.
>>40849493>2>1
>>4085659This anon was born in jank, molded by it. He didn't see polished gameplay until he was already a man.I loved 2 but the combat is unwieldy.
2 > 3 > 1 for me unironically , but i know almost no one has this opinion
>>4084949I still have nightmares about running back and forth through that fucking swamp in 1
>>4093072witcher 1 is my favorite, swamp is completely streamlined in my playthroughs, no pointless wandering around, even then it's still annoying. but the swamp in w2 is worse and w3 doesn't have any sections that are overtly bad like it, but it's also 60 hours longer so w1 remains my favorite. if w3 was the size of blood and wine and had the sovl of hearts of stone throughout the whole game, it would be beat w1 for me, but alas, there's too many openworldisms and it's too bloated.
/vrpg/ is so fucking "pick-me"so many obviously performative statementsI'm not like all the other girls, are you impressed by my opinions?
>>4093259>are you impressed by my opinionsyes, very impressed. ur a bloody prodigy m8
Played them all and 1 is the only game I've enjoyed fully. 2 is neat. I think they definitely improve throughout the trilogy on certain aspects. They feel like bigger more complete games, but its disproportionate. As the games got bigger, the combat never improved. I don't want to play a 100 hour rpg with braindead combat.
>>4084949I didnt even know her!
>>4084949Witcher's 1 total atmosphere and feel was unique and I don't think has ever been replicated in the later games. Maybe parts of W3.
>>4093259fucking kek man you've spent the whole thread seething uncontrollably at people preferring the good games in the series to the shit one (witcher 3)
In this thread we have le classic 4 chan contrarians arguing that the dated piece of shit of witcher 1 is the best. >but anon, it has le soul!!!I wouldn't expect anything less vrpg, keep it up.
>>4099161>dated piece of shit of witcher 1Witcher 3 is now older than Witcher 1 was when Witcher 3 came out. You’re just a baby who “can’t play old games because they’re too clunky”For the record, I have not weighed in on 1 vs 3, simply taken the position that 2 is not the best one.
>>4098002This had a lot to do with the sound design IMO.Witcher 1 is the best-sounding RPG I ever played.>tfw night falls and you hear the barghests howling
>>40849491 > 2 > 3, I got bored with 3 and dropped it midway
1 is pretty amazing for a literal neverwinter nights mod
>>4099161That's the only way they get attention
>>4085087>wherekys esl
>>40849491 > 3 > 2 for me.
>>4100949there's no way an esl would be posting in a witcher threadit is simply inconvincible
>>4098002I really liked rural areas, like the village, outskirts and so on.
>>4102292Yeah, everyone liked the skirts
Playing The Witcher 1 right now for the first time. I've recently just finished the book series, and I had only played 3 and was my intro to the franchise.Planning on doing the entire series, and DLCs since I never played them.So far I just started Chapter 2. It's kinda ehhhh. Combat I enjoyed at the beginning but now the endless spawning and tracking of enemies just makes it irritating. Inventory system is retarded too.My biggest complaints so far, barring combat: Too much back-tracking, and I hate sometimes you leave dialouge for no reason after clicking a "non-ending" option.Also, are the sidequests worth it? So far its just fluff for money and XP I dont really need.
>>4102649I do have to say, I agree with anon >>4098002The atmosphere is great, and I really loved the graphics (animation non-withstanding)
>>4102649>are the sidequests worth it?If you enjoy the gameplay, then yes.If you don't, then why play the game at all?
>>4102292For me, it's Old Vizima.
>>4102787SOVL
Time to replay Witcher 3 ->
>>4084949Truth nuke
>>4084949witcher 2 is shit. so are the novels. witcher 1, 3 and short stories are peak witcher
>>40849491 > 3 > 2
>>4120538>such edgy>challengy>much contrary>wow
>>4120960That’s not contrarian. That’s just someone who disagrees with you.The best one is either 3 or 1, depending on your personal preferences.The contrarian take is 2 is the best one.
as video games I feel like TW1 is the only one that wasn't too much on the hand-holding side of things so I think TW1 is the best (or rather the least bad) but tw2 sucks dicks and TW3 has higher production value and nice OST and some good stories so1>3>2
TW2 has sex with Ves so there is a point for it, but none with Saskia so that is a point against it. TW3 cut out best boy Iorveth so that is a point against it. TW1 has neither Ves, Saskia, nor Iorveth.
>>4122293>TW1 has neither Ves, Saskia, nor Iorveth.Check out the big brain on Todd
>>4122293TW1 has a vampire orgy though
>>4122293Ves was the only character I (voluntarily) shagged in the entire series, simply because it seemed like a natural progression of Geralt's relationship with her. Neither Yen nor Triss tempted me, because they were both fucking mad, in different ways.I did screw Kiera Metz for plot purposes, but I still feel unclean to this day.
>>4122293>>4122305>>4123248In my single playthrough of 2 I went the Iorveth route because I was promised elf and succ sex. Don't know if it was the big brain move or not, since Roche's route only had Ves (maybe shouldn't say "only" since Ves is pure sexo but still).
Do I need to play 1 and 2 before 3?
>>4124127You could go in blind and play 3 and it would spoon feed you everything you need to know. It’s largely self-contained.Playing 1 and 2 first would give you background info that is occasionally referred to. There’s also a handful of choices in 2 that can be imported that make minor changes to the game (like if a side character is alive or dead)Reading the books before playing the games will obviously give more depth to the characters and let you understand little nods
>>4124131Thanks anon.>There’s also a handful of choices in 2 that can be imported that make minor changes to the gameI've given up on that concept after Mass Effect
I played w2 near its release and it was incredibly impressive for the atmosphere, mature tone, great characters that werent what I had seen before. w1 isnt better in any aspect, I like having the npcs look less like abstract placeholders
>>4124127Play 2 since it has all of the choices and story that matter for 3.
>>4085306>>4084949Here is my retard take. I Think Witcher 3 is overall the better game. But Witcher 1 is the better "witcher" game. I only played it once so I might be bias, but I liked the aspect of having to research the plants and monsters and then collect them and then make potions before going for the kill. The third one is a more ambitious, less monster-hunting focused, more about saving the world, your daughter and choosing a wife. I also loved Gwent in witcher 3. What decks do you play? I played a Nilfgaardian spy deck. Did you guys enjoyed the dice game in witcher 1? I also liked playing that one.
>>4098002listen to thishttps://youtu.be/64elMyXoBtQ
>>4124681>I Think Witcher 3 is overall the better game. But Witcher 1 is the better "witcher" gameCorrect
anyone else crashing in the 3 remaster when winning in Gwent?
>>4124681>Gwent decksI really, REALLY want to play Monsters but I feel railroaded into Northern Realms until I grind up enough cards. I just like the idea of Geralt using a deck in line with his profession.
>>4124681There are mods that can turn W3 into the best witchering game.
>>40849492>The Uninstall Wizard>Reading the awful book series>3>1W2 is one of the only fantasy/adventure-type games I've played where you're a small fish in a big pond. I really liked the fact that you're just an observer to a series of larger events rather than the main character on the world stage. Wish there were more games like that.
>>4086164>you have to click left mouse x3 times more often therefore gooder
Shani > Triss > Philippa Eilhart > every other female > Yennifer
>>4128876now this is contrarian kinoyou take what was posted here and you blow it out of the water>>4120984
>>4131291based
>>4124127Don't skip 1, Geralt was kind of sassy in a lot of dialogue options and the NPCs were funny as well in a dark humor kind of way. That's what I probably liked the most about that + the unique dark ages atmosphere that seemed to be missing in 2 and 3.
>>4124127>need toDo whatever you want nigga1 has a special kind of soul you only get in games made by passionate people on a shoestring budget. I played it through twice and will do it this Christmas again.
>>4084949First game is still the best. Best atmosphere, moody, alien, interesting.
>>4124681Fair perspective. I thought Witcher 2 had the best plot and characters, so I think of it more fondly over Witcher 1 even if I think what you're saying is true.
>>4132117Unironically I would join Grand Master, if game would give me such opportunity
I wish there was another game that captured the Witcher 1 feel. I like prep and doing research
>>4139445I really liked TW1 combat and playing in isometric mode
>>40849492 > 3 > 1
>>4124681So you are saying there is only one witcher game? Agreed.
>>4084949>played 2 first, enjoyed it>tried 1, too jank, couldn't get into it>tried 3, played for 20 hours or so before realizing I was completely bored and didn't give a single fuck about the story or whatever quest I was doing, quit and never felt any desire to pick it up again
>>4140347Also I'm with >>4085659, I played 2 on the hardest difficulty and remember really enjoying the combat and having to constantly rely on blending magic and items to survive. One of my biggest disappointments going to 3 was that the combat felt like a huge downgrade.
