What was stopping Nintendo from just releasing 720P 30 FPS versions of their new games for Switch 1? No Nintendo exclusives bar perhaps OoT Remake looks good enough for it to NOT have a Switch 1 release. For instance Bananza could lower resolution and foliage detail and be playable for Switch 1.
Because the back port in question had to cut out entire chunks of the open world to run.
They want to sell Switch 2's.
Anti-consumerism, pure and simple. More than anything they noticed the Switch 1 craze was waning and they wanted to create a big launch moment to move hardware and spark interest in Nintendo games again. The Switch 2 exclusive games not running on Switch 1 is just them acting and pretending like Switch 2 is something entirely separate, but everyone knows it’s only artificially separate and Switch 2 could have easily just been a Switch 1 Pro
>>750734323It’s completely unoptimized for Switch 1 and it’s running on a fucking emulator. Nintendo could have absolutely made a switch 1 version
>>750734176They want to sell more Switch 2s.The hacks completely confirm that the Switch can just run the fucking games because the Switch 2 emulator is literally just a patched Switch 1 emulator.
>overclocked >2 fps
Why is every emulation thread so brown hands coded?
>>750734391The fact you have to cut out entire segments of the open world for a lesser port is simply not worth it, especially when Switch 1 has a dog CPU.
>>750735658>Switch 1 has a dog CPUSo does switch 2
I remember playing Ground Zeroes on PS3 and the experience was so shit (I couldn’t even line headshots because it was so blurry) i never tried Phantom Pain until like ten years after it released
>>750735806I played phantom pain in the PS3 and I enjoyed it.
>>750734176Nintendo is pure fucking evil. The Monsanto of vidya.
