>>750730658
no

Didn't see any doom threads about it here, so it must be an okay game.

>>750730658
What I wonder about is did they ever fix the performance?
I heard they walked back the cringe 3 and if they kept or improved the gameplay then it feels it may be worth checking out
But the key thing is the performance

>>750730930
I guess yes, it's running great on my shitbox

I've been playing the cracked version and it's OK. The open world is truly useless. Tons of empty space with nothing to do but waste time inbetween objectives. Enemy spawns are so sparse (and so few spawn anyways) that they're not even worth interacting with. The only times the game is fun are when you're hard locked into a main/side quest that sends you down a linear set of areas that ends in a boss. Everything else sucks. Build variety may technically be higher than 2 or 3 but the vault hunters themselves are really boring with generally more boring builds to pick between IMO

I really like BL2 and would give it an 8. I'd give both 3 and 4 a 6.5 or 7

>>750730791
Not much point in complaining about optimization and the open world one year later. The only outstanding news the game had lately is people around here being surprised at how sexy Loveless is.

>>750730658
Meh. It's fine. Not great. The open world wasn't a great addition (but is it ever?). It's more of the same really. If you want Borderlands, that's what it will give you. But if like most people you think that sounds tedious and cringe at this point, you'd be right.

>>750730658
What is the point of adding an open world with nothing in it?

NO. IT LITERALLY WONT STOP SPOUTIONG REDDIT QUIPS. NO MATTER WHAT. EVERY 3 MINUTES A REDDIT QUIP WILL HAPPEN. THIS THING NEEDS TO DIE