/v/ - Why was it socially acceptable to rate a good game - Video Games

Anonymous

10/31/26(Sat)09:30:24 No.750699848

File: 1793450466611369.png (572 KB, 1599x664)

572 KB PNG

Anonymous 10/31/26(Sat)09:30:24 No.750699848 Archived

>>750700152 >>750700378 >>750700496 >>750700985

Why was it socially acceptable to rate a good game a 3/10 back in 2005, yet nowadays it's considered an act of lèse-majesté to rate a game lower than a 7/10?

Anonymous
10/31/26(Sat)09:38:10 No.750700152

Anonymous 10/31/26(Sat)09:38:10 No.750700152

>>750700608

>>750699848
It wasn't acceptable, it was a theater where magazines chose a weak kid to laugh at. They always checked the publisher behind the game before writing anything

Anonymous
10/31/26(Sat)09:43:38 No.750700378

Anonymous 10/31/26(Sat)09:43:38 No.750700378

>>750700585 >>750700985

>>750699848
It's out of TEN
FIVE (5) is average not SEVEN

Why the fuck has it become like this???

Anonymous
10/31/26(Sat)09:46:03 No.750700496

Anonymous 10/31/26(Sat)09:46:03 No.750700496

>>750699848
>Why was it socially acceptable to rate a good game a 3/10 back in 2005

it has never been ok to rate a AAA game less than a 7.

Anonymous
10/31/26(Sat)09:48:11 No.750700585

Anonymous 10/31/26(Sat)09:48:11 No.750700585

File: 1781692494721134.jpg (379 KB, 2304x1728)

379 KB JPG

>>750700378
Actually the average is 5.5

Anonymous
10/31/26(Sat)09:48:39 No.750700608

Anonymous 10/31/26(Sat)09:48:39 No.750700608

>>750700152
>It wasn't acceptable
God Hand 3/10
Urban Reign 3/10
Dead or Alive Xtreme Beach Volleyball 3/10

Anonymous
10/31/26(Sat)09:48:56 No.750700628

Anonymous 10/31/26(Sat)09:48:56 No.750700628

Damn bro why are we having another deadlock thread

Anonymous
10/31/26(Sat)09:56:22 No.750700985

Anonymous 10/31/26(Sat)09:56:22 No.750700985

>>750699848
>>750700378
anything lower than 7/10 will hurt the creator's feelings :(((