why isn't Draken featured in more games?
Better question: why do like half the fucking deceptacons take this form?
>>750626052even more weirder. Why do they keep making coneheads when no ones like them.
>>750626052it's very deceptive or something shit I don't know I always got lego as a kid
>>750625931Because it's not a combat-proven aircraft, and the F-106 and F-104 are more capable
>>750625931Obscure, looks weird, never fired a shot in anger.I still love it, though.
>>750626227why can't they cobra tho
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aJbdywfN9S8
>>750625931Aviation is tragically under-appreciated. As now-major franchises got their start, they understandably either built from the "present day" (90s) or our postmodern mythology, WW2. Warthunder is the only notable exception, and even then some 75% of the players are either playing tanks or flying out premium 4th gen packs.Suffice to say, I share your laments
>>750627089Much as I appreciate the Sabre and Supersabre for their technical advancements, they just look too goddamn goofy with that gaping hole in their front. Like the early ancestors of the X32.
>>750627150>ÖBH DrakenI member them flying sorties overhead.
F-16 (draken)
>>750626227Draken dunks on both of those though
>>750625931Bcuz it's dog shit and would be eaten even by mig29s in real conflict
>>750631846Plane from the 50s vs plane from the 80s
