[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
4chan
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.




File: IMG_8331.jpg (244 KB, 1600x1400)
244 KB JPG
Why do so many people struggle to understand such a basic film? The amount of people who think she was possessed by a demon (or his cat lol) is bizarre. Like that’s the only framework they can think through
>>
>>224048274
There’s no way anybody could make this goovie in 2026 and not know how it would be responded to by each of the warring factions
>>
>>224048274
They’re just incels that got buck broken over this movie and seething over it
>>
>inb4 people start saying monkey paw
>>
>>224048310
Care to expand in an intellectual way?
>>
>>224048330
They relate to Bear
>>
It was a chimps paw. All wishes go bad. The money I don’t understand though
>>
>>224048274
>Bro she wasn't possessed! The director said so!
>Just ignore the scene where the willow call center guy has access to information about Bear's case that he was never told! Or that he has access to Nikki's tortured soul!
>It's an alternate personality bro!
>>
Kinda had me thinking about Under Your Spell by Desire, where they ask "Do you know the difference between love and obsession?" And a bunch of women go "No." "And do you know the difference between obsession and desire?" "I don't know."

Really liked the movie.
Had me all reminiscent, thinking about the past.
>>
>>224048436
He said it wasn’t a demonic possession you jeet
>>
>>224048436
That's all Baer's point of view. A character shown to be unreliable from literally his first scene. Are you really incapable of understanding themes and ideas that are presented with even a single layer obscuring them? Anything said by characters in the story must be literally true and that's it, for you?
>>
>>224048274
The filmmaker said she was possessed on twitter and that got the loud 11% of twitter “women” who are responsible for >80% of twitter activity to incessantly spam about it
>>
>>224048478
I think the entire movie was a dream, or rather a nightmare, which is why Nikki was screaming at the end after she "woke up".
>>
>>224048436
I’m really interested. Why do you believe it’s magical enough that a possession is true, but you don’t think bear could have been talking to the “real” Nikki in her subconscious and that’s who was screaming over the call?

Surely you must understand they’re both just as possible? But only one is actually supported by what we see and hear and what the filmmaker said?

Willing yourself to believe it’s possession comes across as autism
>>
>>224048906
Lmao good one
>>
>>224048524
He said she wasn’t possessed though

https://collider.com/obsession-curry-barker-pearl-midsommar-possession-explained/

It’s weird how much Normies struggle to comprehend an idea overtaking somebodies mind and keep defaulting to possession
BTC
bc1qtm4rep7kyp2p28hlkfktpnd0j7uew47vnt2mev
LTC
ltc1q9xlaysse0mpfwf025esd69kt9zu3md22gh23du
ETH
0x6abA18D203520c8F90ca63eE7426a7bC345D98e6
SOL
E5ekoiauCR8yiNp451dmuPzhUxo84P5x3m9WJBK5kxZe
XRP
r3jYXNdMk2Vz5hXhKCKE9re8uz93JQFG1r
DOGE
DSBq5jRWkiwmEh1G7zBwmQDgRkvRr61fmb
XMR
85CTwq5wGjWZw5GgzgwZPrHyZxpLXMK5oZSSSk5j4x9w1bpqzisaWAUZYaAPfh6rP2MZJcaFqF1XmEzkw6YCqJSS2Txu6Z8




Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.