It's weird how this was The Force Awakens before The Force Awakens but nobody cared because it wasn't Star Wars.
>>224001969What would have had to happen for you to think people cared? It made like $1.5B in the box office.
>>224003638>le box officeI meant in the sense that it was a franchise-destroying reboot that's just a rehash of the first movie's plot and themes but only understands them on a surface level and treats the audience like they're retarded.
>>224001969Jurassic World doesn't have as much lore to mangle, it's just bad on typical writing issues
>>224004241True, but they based the entire premise of World on an intentional mangling of Hammond's character arc and treated it like a throwaway joke so people wouldn't think about it.And I mean intentional, because there were probably plenty of ways you could have done a newly operational Jurassic Park without going "erm, ACKtually it was Hammond's dying wish to build this on top of the graves of the people who died as a consequence of his dream, going against everything he learned in the first film and then what he stood for in sequel."