Why do modern movies always have scenes/plotlines where a man has to confront their personal faults and admit they are the problem but there's zero scenes like that for women?
Most movies don't have a female lead
>>223986684Because we live in a gynocentric society wherein the real narcissists (women) can't countenance honest self-assessment. So every effort is made to hide women's flaws behind a straw man of patriarchal oppression and emasculating vulnerability.
because women arent complex or interesting and also dont deserve a redemption arc, obv.
>>223986684You just don't watch things with female protagonists. Even decades ago, what you described was a big part of Buffy and was the totality of Xena.
>>223986684Women can't have redemption arc. As they are not constant in their thoughts at all. They are also averse to logic.It only matters to them what they feel at this very moment and they act and think on it. Doesn't matter what happened before, doesn't matter how their actions will affect the future. Fuck it. I feel, I think about this feel I act on this feel. They're retarded and should be stripped of any rights that influence society.
>>223987214>ask about why this isn't in modern movies>Anon brings up decades old tv shows as a counter argument "gotcha"
>>223987334Anon btfo
His therapist also broke down and admitted she was just using this client to get an income, so your example isn't perfect.
>>223986684Watch more movies.
>>223987368such as?
Only if the woman protagonist’s bf is a minor, unironically this is common in society films
>>223986684Psychotherapy struggle sessions will continue until testosterone levels in males drop.
human life is only possible because women cook babies for 9 monthsonce we can automate this then women can be criticized again, but we’ll have bigger problems by then like corpo clone armies
women cant be written with character flaws, that would be misogynistic
Nova Squad doesn't have this problem
>>223986684He had a few beers.
>>223987446Don't worry I know a guy that can hook us up with a robot army. He's one of those old money European aristocrat guys.
>>223987386[I'm this fag >>223987355]honorable mention to, of all people, Amy Schumer in "Trainwreck" whose character accepts her flaws after almost hooking up with a 16/m
>>223986684bring back Harvey
>>223986684because women are mentally children and the trope of confronting and coming to terms with your faults is suspends too much disbelief for the average audience member.
>>223986684Owning up to one's flaws requires courage. Which sex do you more associate with courage?
>>223986737this
>cry about female protagonists in unrealistic scenarios like fighting a bunch of men and winning >want females protags to face their flaws and come to grips with their own guilt and mistakes in lifePick one
>>223986684Would you say this is a ritual of some sort...?
The true real answer, is that men don't mind being trampled onThis current life infinitely accomodates to women and you do nothing about itNo men doesAs soon as a man in power says anything closely resembling "Women should have less rights maybe..." he's immediately casted out
>>223986684Foids, explain what Clark did wrong. He paid for the house, he paid for his lazy wife's NON-COMPULSORY education and he was even going to single-handedly pay for their children (if they had any).
I thought the implication was that she became a therapist because she wanted to reassure herself that she wasn't destined to become a schizo nutjob like her mother, even if she herself thought that was her inescapable fate.
His therapist did nothing right. She was awful and drove him to breaking.
>>223986684art imitates life
>>223990140I'm not a woman, but Clark's issue seemed to be that he was actually comfortable (and even secretly happy) about being a shitty furniture salesman and indignantly fuming about how the world was what was keeping him from realizing his true potential as an architect. Meaningfully trying to succeed as an architect would involve leaving his comfort zone and putting his ambitions to the test, and he might fail, which would prove that he lacked what it took. He would no longer be able to longingly look at his architectural sketches while working his shitty job, thinking "man, I should and could be doing that... and one day I will, just not today," he'd have to accept that he actually can't cut it at his dream job.
The same ethnic network runs parallel campaigns across finance (usury systems and central-bank capture), academia (Frankfurt School derivatives and demographic theory), immigration policy (open borders for the host while Israel remains ethnostate), law (disparate-impact doctrine and hate-speech regimes), and institutional capture of NGOs, intelligence, and corporate HR. Each front weakens the majority’s cohesion, fertility, and political power while concentrating leverage in the same hands.This is not conspiracy theater. It is observable pattern recognition across a century: Bolshevik leadership demographics, interwar cultural radicalism, postwar media consolidation, and the post-1960s demographic project. The host population treated each front as isolated “progress” or “markets” and slept through the cumulative effect. The culture war is simply the most visible surface. The rest never stopped.
>>223990448Sick of hearing about how oppressed you are under jews. Do something about it or suck it up, yboi.
>>223990219just like real therapists
>>223986684>women>being wronglollmaoKeep in mind, they think a woman should get away with strangling her three kids to death because she felt sad.
>>223989572kek
>>223990479Open organization gets you deplatformed, fired, or worse. So the only permitted options become private resignation or isolated, easily crushed gestures. Then the same voices mock the silence they enforced.Talk is not the opposite of action. Accurate diagnosis is the precondition for any coherent response. Pretending the demographic and institutional reality does not exist is how the host population stayed asleep through every prior front. The body counts, the cultural inversion, the fertility collapse, and the dual-loyalty structures are not feelings. They are measurable. Refusing to name them is not toughness. It is compliance. We are going to kill you all.
>>223990575Notice how you flail wildly at anything that criticizes you. You’re undisciplined and weak and that’s why you lose to those you cry about.
Why there's a digger in my backrooms?
>>223990290That was highlighted by the scene right before the films premise actually kicks in when he drives by his house and contemplates talking to his wife. Whether it ended up good or bad for him he would have the power to actually change his life. But he ultimately retreated, and he gets punished for that choice by being eaten by a corrupt pirate version of himself
