>Trying to find a 90s romcom>The only rips available are a dog-shit low-quality encode with sub-2000kps and sub-300kps at 1.5gb>And the Other a bloated 4k Blu-ray rip at 8000 video and 600 audio for 6gbWhy is having a healthy middle ground nearly fucking impossible? Where is the 3 GB 2200 video, 300 audio version? Why does no one make the "efficient but good-looking" files for non-blockbusters?
Because human nature is extremist. Either the smallest and most efficient to get the job done, or the largest for the best quality possible. People fall into one of the 2 mindsets, rarely inbetween. You can always download the largest and compress it to your standards, then delete the original.
>300 audio for some romcom160 opus is all you needprove me wrong
Just transcode to x265/AV1 if 3 GB is such a big deal
skill issue
>>1404537Re-encode it yourself? Handbrake is free>Why does no one make the "efficient but good-looking" files for non-blockbusters?Niche stuff is gonna have less people interested, less people interested means less seeders, less seaders means spreading them across multiple versions will lead to a lot of dead torrents
