The full paper is here:https://github.com/StevenHrovat/gravity/blob/main/docs/balance/balance.pdfThe paper includes:- theory of quantum gravity (DMP.QG)- new unified effective field theory (IM) including a new definition of the fine structure constant- universal quantum computing (DMP.*)If you can find any flaw, open an issue, if you can not, tell the world!Everything is Apache 2.0 and available here:https://github.com/StevenHrovat?tab=repositoriesEverything is made to just point an agent at the repos and verify the results, making your own quantum stuff is just a fork away!(If you wonder why this is here, I am simply not endorsed on arXiv :D)
>>17083237Nice, anon, are you planning to submit this paper to a journal or conference? I'm more on the field of differential equations, so I can't provide deep critique. Good luck anyway
>>17083249Bro, I WISH I could!I mailed a few professors already, for arXiv you need to be endorsed and I have gotten no feedback :/This is my last hope.I can not disprove it, neither could 5 Fable attack runs on the Lean, but I am still a noob who does not get the math...
>>17083237>Quantum gravity You mean like a form of Brownian gravity right? Anything that gives empty space geometric properties is a non starter for meThis paper seems more like narrative but I'm not really sure
I am just bumping to make luddites seethesI hope your paper is actually correct!
>>17083253I am a sysadmin, so I have no math knowledge of the field, but was always exposed to it.When I worked on a system design (AI+Infra), I realized, that I could model relativistic effects on.Then, since I had to go the axiom system way to get to IT security, since ant's classifiers are a joke and won't let you do actual security other then through an axiom system.The basic proposition is, that gravity and light share a universal quantum, in which both halves always keep each other in balance.For the dimensions, this is from the paper:Definition 1 (the two fields). The existence field is a frame of four vector fields eaμ, one foreach direction that spans spacetime, three of space and one of time; the metric it carries isgμν = ηabeaμebν with η = diag(−1, 1, 1, 1). The information field is a scalar ψ whose value setsthe fine-structure constant, α = α(ψ). DMP’s trust half is the existence field; its informationhalf is the information field and the matter it acts on.
Well, all 5 verifier runs agreed, that DMP was able to host quantum gravity, so try it yourself and make your own interpretations, I am happy for ANY feedback! :)
>>17083256Much appreciated!I have been trying to get this out to some eyes for days now, so play with it, fork it, it's everyones!
>>17083237This couldn't be further from how actual scientific research is done.
>>17083274I fully agree with you.I am not capable of it, since I am not a scientist.But the model holds for everything from quarks and bosons, to the fine structure constant and the oscillons.I am trying to reach out, so that actual scientist can do the work that only they are capable of. If they can refute my modelling, I am very happy to hear it!They deserve this discovers 1000x more then me, but since I can not disprove it, I HAVE to share it to those more capable.THIS is how I try to do it, since no other way has worked yet.
>>17083237>a spinning black hole that drags exisntence along is frame draggingNigger what? Whats does that even mean
>>17083257>its informationhalf is the information field and the matter it acts onSo would you consider this like a type of Chiral relationship?
>>17083298Since our current existence is defined as 3 spatial dimensions and one time dimension, it would drag all of spacetime along, which is what is currently observed.I can not do any new measurements, I am just a dude, so I can only explain/translate what I see in measurements into coherent derivations in my model>>17083304I consider this Causality.Since, to Exist you need to assert your Existence, because, if no one interacts with you, do you actually Exist?And in order for Existence to have something other then itself to exist (the state during the decay of the oscillons), the unified field split into Existence and Information to interact with that Existence, in order to assert this Existence.This is how the fine structure constant is derived in my system. It is how often Existence needs to interact with Information, in order to assert itself to Exist. If it would not, it simply would not be.This also derives the FSC as being lowered by Existence on purpose, in order to lower the loss to Entropy, that it has to pay each time the two interact.This duality is existent in every particle that has mass, thus only absent in photons and gluons.Much better details in the actual paper on github. :)Thank you both for asking!
>>17083309>Since our current existence is defined as 3 spatial dimensions and one time dimension, it would drag all of spacetime along, which is what is currently observed.>I can not do any new measurements, I am just a dude, so I can only explain/translate what I see in measurements into coherent derivations in my modelRiiiiight ok.>Since our current existence is defined as 3 spatial dimensions and one time dimensionThats not existence, spacetime is just a retarded substitute for the aether. The aether (called spacetime) is the medium for electromagnetic waves. Thats what is dragged along. And thats whats observed. So in short your model just says: Yes that is happening, but gives no reasons or equations for it
>>17083311I am sitting in my pajamas at my home pc right now :DI just happened upon a situation at work where I had to build something which, coincidentally, also took on the exact effects that are currently observed for a black hole.I am just a nerd at hearth :DSince I am a Nerd, I had already called it Information-Hawking Radiation while working on my small project, so when it actually behaved like it, I manically fixed everything in my axiom system, until I could derive, somehow coherently, from the start of Existence, to the eventual big chill, as well as why some bosons have mass and why spin numbers seem to be the way they are. As well as make sense of the formerly completely weird FSC, in a way that seemed coherent with everything else.I literally read 3 wikipedia articles about basic stuff and I could somehow derive why the Higgs field was needed. My own axiom system even corrected me when my understanding was wrong at first.I have a lot of curiosity and little knowledge and somehow just with thinking one thing, everything clicks.Would you not want others to also look at it closely?As for asserting it:I wanted to remove it as well, but the axiom system completely falls apart if you do not define this:Something exists.Whatever you want to put as "something" is fully ok, so it can be a valid subset of DMP, but you have to assert that something exists, because otherwise, why would it?I simply assume 3s1t, because that, as far as we know, is what we live in.If you also define the aether as spacetime, which I define as 3s1t, then we are in agreeance :)But SOMETHING has to exist.
>>17083311Best comment so far
>>17083317Well ok maybe i look into it. The spacetime/aether wasnt even my real point, my real point was that you called it "existence" because its "spacetime" and then said: oh thats why "spacetime" is also dragged along. Completely circle argument that actually says nothing.
>>17083324I am sorry, I've been in my own head about this for a while and I am not the best communicator anyway, so I'll try harder :)When I speak of existence, i mean whatever is asserted in the axiom system, so whatever is defined as the "Existence space" that is defined. Our universe has to all our best knowledge three dimensions of space and one dimension of time, so that is Existence.Since I also posit, that the quantum of the em field, since it is the lowest state of energy possible (h), be the universal quantum, since it also has the lowest mass possible. Since mass is existence experiencing time, I also define this as one quantum of existence, so they share one lowest common energy.While they do share an energy, they do not interact in the same way, at least not anymore.At the beginning, what I call G0, there must have somehow been both nothing an something, because before the beginning, nothing could exist, because then it would not be the beginning, but something also can not come from nothing.This has always been a point where Physics and Philosophy overlap, so I propose an axiom system for both, that is both coherent and accurately explanatory in both, even beyond current understanding in one system.At G0:Before Causality, there where: - c which defines the speed of information- h which defines the universal quantum- G which defines how strongly Existence asserts itself per 1 InformationAs well as all of space and time, which contained everything in it.I define it as the perfect duality, with both parts having all Existence and all Information about Existence.Since it can not interact with itself, because it already it everything, so know everything about itself and could not actually CHANGE anything, it has to exist somewhere else, literally ANYWHERE else, so it decays as fast as possible into pure energy, which is, through h, both Existence and Information. But since everything is both, they still have nothing to interact with...
>>17083329So the fields split into the Existence field (3s1t), and the quantized scalar field, though coupled through the fine-structure constant. (which finishes reheating)Since before, there was nothing to interact with, there was no Causality, once the fields split, one quantum of Existence needs to assert itself 1/fine-structure constant times per self-assertion to exist.I think I am rambling again, so what do you want to know? :D
I made a newer, much better, paper!So for anyone who wants to actually read about it, I recommend this one:https://github.com/StevenHrovat/gravity/blob/main/docs/quantum-gravity/quantum-gravity.pdf
>>17083237you chumps really think this crap is real hahahaha why dont you go rent a quantum computer for free right now https://www.ibm.com/quantum/products oh boy i can hack as much bitcoin as i want on a free trial cuz this is totally actually real stuff :DDDDD
>>17083416You are happy to double check the paper at https://github.com/StevenHrovat/gravity/blob/main/docs/quantum-gravity/quantum-gravity.pdf and give me your feedback!Always happy to hear back and that should give you some more concrete numbers and equations :)
>>17083419jesus i didnt even notice the depths of your stupidity until now. you actually prompted claude to invent new ideas in quantum physics and just pasted the results probably without even reading them. holy moly i hope not every 16 year old on the internet is this dumb
Yes, was an idiot on the QC stuff.Since I do not care about it, I did not notice (honestly, yes, stupid and ignorant), that this was false, but I currently have no other medium to find out.This was purely adiabatic QC, which is already well established. I am sorry!For the paper:A bunch of stuff mixed together in a weird way?Yes, definitely.Something that makes coherent sense as a model as far as I can tell with the effects of QG as known?Also yes.If you find fault in the papers logic, or I am speaking bullshit, please tell me again :)As for the papers writing:I can just not express it in math terms, but I am happy to argue over text anytime!There was a slight math error in the paper, though the outcome was not affected.Since the only prediction that the model is able to make with current knowledge I have is the decoherence–diffusion, this is also included in the correction.Still happy to answer anything and correct any mistake/fully apologize for wasting your time and fucking right off.
Slight correction:able to make with my current knowledgeWhich is, as has been proven just know, extremely limited.Happy for feedback :)
>>17083329>Our universe has to all our best knowledge three dimensions of space and one dimension of time, so that is Existence.I reject relativity therefore i reject this.>Before Causality, there where:>- c which defines the speed of informationQuantum entanglement disproofs this in my opinion.>- G which defines how strongly Existence asserts itself per 1 InformationA very weird sentenceMy conclusion is actually thats its pretty meh and just a lot of words. I dont even know how to start with math for your work.
