i don't think they can look through things as such
4d is about time, so a 4d being can move through time until the obstacle is gone
but i think only if the obstacle is gone within the being's own lifespan

for more control you need 5d, that brings other timelines where the obstacle was never there

>>17082799
No, you’re confused. You can have four spatial dimensions but only one temporal dimension. That’s what OP is referring to.

>>17082905
A fourth physical spatial dimension does not necessarily intersect our three-dimensional universe. Whether it does depends on the geometry and topology of the higher-dimensional space.

Consider a two-dimensional sheet embedded in three-dimensional space. A 3D object can exist entirely above the sheet without touching it. Similarly, a four-dimensional object could exist without ever intersecting our 3D world.

There are several possibilities:

1. Embedded universe: Our 3D universe could be a hypersurface within a larger 4D space. Other objects or hypersurfaces could exist without intersecting ours.
2. Braneworld models: Ordinary matter might be confined to our three spatial dimensions, while gravity could propagate through additional dimensions. Other universes might occupy separate hypersurfaces.
3. Additional coordinate: In a space described by (x, y, z, w), our universe might occupy w = 0, while other 3D regions occupy w = 1 or w = 2. These parallel hypersurfaces never intersect.
4. Disconnected spaces: Higher-dimensional regions could be entirely disconnected from ours, although their physical existence would be difficult to establish without observable interactions.

The crucial distinction is that dimensions are independent directions, not objects that must intersect. A fourth spatial dimension does not automatically imply that four-dimensional objects pass through our universe.

Furthermore, even if additional spatial dimensions exist, our universe need not be a cross-section of higher-dimensional objects.

The existence of higher dimensions does not mathematically require their contents to intersect or interact with our three-dimensional world.

>>17082795
there is no higher dimension anon. you have 3 spatial ones. the rest are mathematical constructs, not proven btw.
just because you can come up with the Bloodborne mythology doesn't make it real.

>>17082795
its the same as 2d vision but your eye focus is a small 4d object.

>>17082795
Yes.

>>17082795
by analogy
imagine a 2d universe represented by stick figures on a flat plane
there are two figures, toby and tim
tim is in his little box house. toby is outside. toby and tim cannot see each other, as they are unable to see above the plane and see our three dimensional perspective. We obviously have no such limitations.

in a similar way, a 4 dimensional being viewing our world would be able to see through boundaries which seem impenetrable to us