>>17082367
Can we please end this horrible 2021 meme? It really is bad and spreading it to brainlets is not a good idea. They come across thinking that casting one’s gaze on an experimental apparatus makes the difference. It does not.

In the double-slit experiment the idea is that if you can detect which slit the electron goes through then it destroys the interference pattern. That much is true but redirecting one’s gaze has never been what is used to make such a detection. In reality it typically amounts to placing a detector directly in the electron beamline in front of one slit.

In a properly designed experiment, even if you constructed the vacuum chamber required for it so one could “see” the electrons’ possible paths, looking at it or not would not change anything. You wouldn’t see the electron in either case. Period. Only if you create something to interact with the electron along one of the laths to a slit would it change the outcome, because causing an interaction with the electron is the crucial mechanism for changing the interference pattern

>>17082372
>but redirecting one’s gaze has never been what is used to make such a detection
As if you could see the electron with your naked eye. The gaze is the detector in that analogy.

>>17082374
For one to “see” a single electron travelling through a vacuum tube by simply redirecting your eye, you would also need to be shining something akin to a light source onto that electron so that your eye could see light bouncing off it. But if you do the calculations for electrons in such an experiment, such a “light source” would need to be extremely high intensity, like a burst of light coming out of a hydrogen bomb to even get a chance of lighting up one of these electrons. The electron has a very small cross section to interact with a normal amount of, say, daylight.

and then once you created such a light source, it wouldn’t matter whether you looked or not at the electron, only if the light source was shining on the electron or not. (Leaving aside the fact that a hydrogen bomb gamma burst would destroy the whole thing in other ways anyway)

File: double slit.png (119 KB, 1023x409)

119 KB PNG

>>17082977

>>17082372
it's even worse than that. single slit interference is found when electrons pass through a single slit. in the top you see double slit. the bottom should look more like this, with a continuous band flanked by smaller bands

>>17082372
Your post was OK but then I looked at your post and it was actually not OK and gay. Explain that one

>>17082571
yeah true, it’s a horrible meme in more ways than one

>>17082975
ah yes true I misspelled “paths” as “laths” my bad, i blame it on my gay phone

The internet has become a horrifying thing. Normies who can't do calculus having hot takes and making memes about physics. There is no point to it. But it will all return to nothing. Ashes to ashes and slop to slop.

>>17082367
>normies hear "observation" influencing outcome
>think it means literally perceiving it with your eyeballs

>>17083435
>The internet has become a horrifying thing.
Let’s use that to train the next internet.

>>17083439
Yes, the great tabernacle of slop. A bright future awaits us.

>>17083441
We couldn’t handle 8 billion unfiltered human opinions.
A dozen authoritative hegemonic voices will help people choose their own teams for the next round.
It’ll be great. 4chan archives are always over-represented in training sets.

>>17083437
that's what it means to observe, yes

>>17082378
I don't think the atoms are in darkness. Each electron reflects the detector or eye, so the gravity amounts up with electrons being close and changes it.

>>17083500
try this experiment. Buy an antique guitar amp or an antique stereo that has vacuum tubes in the back. With it off look at the tubes and look at the space between the anodes and cathode where the electrons travel through. Turn it on. Tell me if you see little electrons flying through the tube after you turn it on. You can even turn it down real low and look if you can see individual electron paths

Why the hysteria?

The sized reflection rate of each electron has long blue/white energy chains of reflections whirling out.

>>17082372
Thank you. Same reason you can never have a picture of a photon.

>>17083503
>The sized reflection rate of each electron has long blue/white energy chains of reflections whirling out.
smoking weed is bad for your IQ

>>17083529
But the weekend has just started. They are a micro run off creations for information that is used in the future change.

>>17083540
Fine, smoke weed on the weekend and make unintelligible posts. We are OK with it here. Shitlost away.

Still OP’s image is a cancer image so let’s move on to better threads

>>17082367
The balances in the distributions between equal sexes, the gay people must be on the outsides of the distributions of the interference patterns. They need a direct connected distribution to make a shot in making us.

>>17083549
why do so many deranged potheads post here?

>>17083553
It was just me. Sorry I do sound too stoned. I'll go, but that gay story was for you..

What if there are hidden variables?

>>17083592
Pish posh. Reality is simply magic on a microscopic level. The science is settled.

>>17083542
>OP’s image is a cancer image so let’s move on to better threads
Why even complain. Out of all the constant pepe, low quality AI panic/fellation, schizo slop and more this is OP is problematic?

>>17083529
What? Also you think anyone IRL cares about IQ?

File: 87524678856.png (1.72 MB, 1516x688)

1.72 MB PNG

>>17083549
The wave would be pressed against a unique inhibitor to the race (DNA) for quantum tunneling signals, so the distributions between the sexes for humans is always in real time one after another.

Not randomly over the top, which would cause distribution errors over time in some places, which we never see.

>>17082372
It's a good test, especially if you're into /x/ stuff, to see if the person talking about it is retarded