it's time for science to go back to a few hobbyist who had nothing to gain from their research besides genuine curiosity the times of clout and easy money are doneand AI hasn't even started clapping cheeks in academia I'm sorry for /sci/entists here but the data is clearNobel prizes could end up shitposting on 0.999... ≠ 1 threads in the future.
>>17080864
>>17080865
>>17080866
>>17080867
Jobs are for women. Why is a penis trying to steal a woman's wealth?
>>17080864industrial science is just starting
>>17080876c o p eope
>>17080884?
>>17080866learn to weld nerd
>nobel-citedlol what a dumb metric
>>17080864My guess is that he bombs all of his interviews. Like, he might have a really fantastic CV but the minute people actually talk to this guy people get turned off. He must have an incredibly shitty personality.
>>17080866>>17080911Learn to say you're a brown woman on your CVBlackrock is likely to blame for the hiring freeze of White men. They tell the companies whose shares they manage to stop hiring them. 98% of new jobs went to women. This is a deliberate top-down policy.>>>/r9k/85836965
>>17081112So what? Impressing HR Karens shouldn't be the most important hiring qualification. Guarantee that at least half of the scientists who worked at Oak Ridge developing the nuclear bomb were weird enough to give modern HR women "the ick".
>>17081112>beer brand baseball cap>leans in his chair when he farts>calls the interviewer "toots"I like this guy, really down to Earth and relatable.
>>17081380>weirdos at Oak Ridge And what did they make?>Little BOY and research for Fat MANMan-pigs make harm-bad, be woman-good for nice-happy.Shrimple as.
