Previous thread: >>17069501
Let's go to Mars and eat McNuggets.
Cancel Starfield
Valid post: >>17072270
Is he even still talking about Mars?
>>17072386Yes.
>>17072273Yes, let's build restaurants in Mars.
WTF, Eppur si muove.The latest iteration of memedrive... kinda works?https://youtu.be/qfcZ90zcFjQ?is=mZYLri78sTsiYxJg
>>17072419Potato-centric restaurant with a few sauce varieties
This is a fake turbonigger /sfg/Real /sfg here:>>17069501>>17069501>>17069501>>17069501
The man who claimed we never went to the moon is dead. RIP. >>17072578
>>17072476
>>17072510Go back to plebbit
>>17073235you go back frognigger.
>>17073336Plebbit is the perfect place for science worshippers like you.
https://youtu.be/cVTWH71tReI?t=13Refute this without sounding mad
https://x.com/NASAAdmin/status/2109026601887293773Out of everything that could be on the 2026 bingo card, I'm pretty sure "NASA Administrator loses it over Redditors" wasn't even considered.
Where's the clown who recently claimed that Starlink doesn't matter for Ukraine?
Imagine if you told ringwatcher autists from back in the day about the absolute state of starship in 2026.>>17074705It doesn’t, they are getting military comms provided by starshield now that it’s a thing, it’s not 2022 anymore. Trump threw a melty and blocked their starshield access when they kept blowing up Russian refineries.
>>17074687>Much of the Reddit noise seems to come from people looking for reasons to take out their affinity for specific hardware, political differences, or personality conflicts on America’s lunar program.He hit the nail on the head here, though
>>17072510It fell below the frog line, which is the new catalog bottom.
>>17074933yea a decade later isn't a working vehicle yet
How does this advance spaceflight?
>>17075532Yet another example of technology developed for spacecraft being used for other applications.
>>17075532Musk loves merging his companies together. Merging Tesla into SpaceX seems silly but Twitter is part of SpaceX, which is even sillier.
>>17075532>retards on twitter are redefining "flying" over this
SpaceX redefining toothbrushes when?
>>17075532>>17075534>SpaceX staff wasting time on this shit when Starship isn't even launching monthly and Raptors are still shitting the bed randomly
The OP pic isn't even spehs,sage
The full development of the Long March 9 has been officially approved.Launch... between 2030 and 2032
>>17072259The real /sfg/ thread.
>>17072357Yes, cancel wokism.
The ISS just flew over my house
>>17074652I'm not watching a video with a black in the thumbnail
when are the static fire tests
Should NASA be defunded because of picrel? This robot made of ebay parts costs the taxpayer $500 000
Really NASA?
What are astronomers smoking???
Canada is known for manufacturing canadarms and canadairs
>>17077601They cant be defunded. The whole cost is driven by how many jobs they can push into a project. It's a feature, not a bug.
JAXA soon:Martian Moons Exploration mission (MMX):Expected to land on Phobos, collect samples and bring them back to Earth. The rover is French/German, expected to have some kino footage if successful.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fn6gzuGa-6cThe only time where that hoe Clear is allowed to be posted.Also don't expect state of the art streaming. But still cool launch.
the jap chick counts starting T5 lol. Sounds like a bit tiring
I apologize to the japs, that was a solid launch and stream. Graphics are a bit too SeXy but it's expected nowadays. Also I'm a bit of a sucker of rockets that aren't just fuel tubes so I enjoyed the separation of the solid ones.
Every time I open a stream the YT interface changes
bump
>mentally ill loser keeps necroing his failed threadEmbarrassing, many such cases.
>17078660Reddit
>>17079626>mentally ill loser that keeps necroing his failed thread is also a redditor and projects this onto othersfigured as much>i'm n-not giving y-you a (you) haha take that!(you)'s are not reddit updoots, my brown reddit fren.sorry your dogshit thread failed, stop slobbering all over your keyboard like a baby, it's embarrassing.
>17079936Struck a nerve with the plebbitor.
Bring back the MMU
>>17080291>i-i’m not mad!Yes, you are, all spammers are fundamentally angry and obsessed losers, normal people have actual hobbies an other things that make them happy, unlike you.
>>17075681>randomlyit's not random at all, they shit the bed reliablythey are murdering each other with acoustic transientsthey need to be either detuned or made much much biggerI will keep posting this until some intern at SpaceX finally reads it and gets a huge bonus for implementing the ideayou're welcome, broheimmake a cairn on Mars for me
I mean, like, the vacuum raptors never blow upwhy can't anyone at SpaceX take a hint?
>17080629How many genders are there?
>>17082024>i-i’m not mad, i-i’m unbothered, stop laughing!See >>17080629
>>17077602The LM is fucking awesome actually
>>17080625I don't think there's really much use for it without the shuttle. Maybe when Starship starts flying in earnest.
Guys what if instead of living on Earth and putting compute in LEO... we put the compute on Earth and we all live in LEO
>Voyager Technologies plans to launch its Starlab commercial space station aboard Starship. Voyager expects Starlab to cost between $2.8 billion and $3.3 billion to develop, build, and launch. Yet the commercial insurance market currently offers only about $650 million in coverage for a single launch, potentially leaving billions of dollars in project costs exposed if something goes wrong.No hatch and uninsurable loss.
