>soul doesn't exist, silly. We're all just matter floating the universe...>AIEEEEE AI SUCKS, IT'S SOULLESS, DON'T USE IT FOR ART! kek
>>85860387Bodied those fucking freaks lmao
>>85860387>I'm going to talk about truth and facts even though I'm a materialist and truth and facts are immaterial and my whole ideology is nonsensical and contradictory>But because nonsense and contradictions don't exist in matter it's all fine lol
>>85860387almost like "soulless" is a figure of speech and not literal
>idiots whose ideas of "soul" are pop art trash from Disney and popular paintings they've seen on TVWhy do we suddenly care what the tasteless think of art? Aren't these the same people who get angry at Picasso and cubism because it lacks photo-realism?AI art (not the free shit from DALL-E) can already emulate any style perfectly, the morons whining about it absolutely could not tell a fake from an original.
>>85860415>truth and facts are immaterialThat's your interpretation lol. You can make a case that the neural activity that happens when you think of something true (I am aware this phrasing makes it seem like there's a distinction but it's an artifact of natural language) is truth itself.
>>85860415>I'm a materialist and truth and facts are immaterialThe opposite though.It's spiritualists/"the faithful" that disregard examined reality and favor the fee-fees and horgie porgies.Souls are trash invented by iron age people who didn't know what a cloud was to explain how we move and think.
>>85860438i hate ai with all my being because the way its going it looks to be the end of talent in the world.
>>85860440There's no difference in the neural activity when you think of something true and something false>muh lie detectorThat's the result of your physical parameters going off because of the external pressure of possible being discovered, that's why true psychos can dodge it perfectly, because the external pressure doesn't affect them
>>85860483>There's no difference in the neural activity when you think of something true and something falseThat's just false though. When you think of some particular thing, certain synapses activate. It is dependent on the particular thing you think of, even if very slightly. Of course a lie detector can't capture this because it's not precise enough. Just because a telescope can't see a faraway star or planet, doesn't mean it's not there.
>>85860463Sorry to burst your bubble, but Aristotle is way smarter than you despite living in a world with orders of magnitude less information Not understanding that is proof you aren't even a midwit
>>85860464>muh talents!Which talents do you have that AI is threatening?Which contemporary artists do you patronize to encourage "soulful" artwork?Actions speak louder than social media words. Nobody cares, not even you.
>>85860505That's a different claim
>>85860521>Aristotle is way smarter than youHe was born an aristocrat that did nothing but study in Plato's academy for 28 years.Also IQ doesn't mean he had access to knowledge. Most of his (non mathematical) shit was guesswork. Guess what? The world isn't made up of four elements. Not a dig on Aristotle, but rather he simply didn't have access to 2000 years of research like we do.If we're going by ancient Greece, then we should recognize that the Titans made the world before Zeus imprisoned them in Tartarus.
>>85860422grow a spine and stop being vague on purpose
>>85860526i enjoy drawing and developing games, i dont think i have to give my money to an artist to be against bots that copy any data they can find, "create" slop and take away jobs.
>>85860549You're dumber than Aristotle, 99.999999% of people are, even people like Terence Tao are. You not being able to accept that just because he lived a billion years ago with very little knowledge shows your intellectual level
>>85860590>I don't have to do anything to elicit changeThen buckle up and get used to AI art, fag.A nobody being "against" something is meaningless. Might as well be against the sun rising tomorrow.
>>85860601>didn't read a word I typedI don't claim to be smarter than a life-long scholar, I never did.I'm just telling you a 4th grader's life science textbook has 1000x more data about the natural world than Aristotle had access to.
>>85860620"fag."generates a dick picyou're free to be absolutely nobody and amount to nothing.
>>85860440>when you think of something trueThis is circular thinking and doesn't tell you where truth comes from. The brain can process something it thinks is truth. But it doesn't tell you that truth exists, what truth is, or where truth comes from. All it is is just chemical reactions. Truth literally cannot come from matter. There is no truth contained in a particle of matter or all the particles of matter. Until I can see truth, you as a materialist either have to concede it doesn't exist, or exists but comes from a non-material place and thus concede your material purist position.>>85860463>disregard examined realityAre you all-knowing? Are you omnipresent? How do you know that to be the case with certainty. If you're trying to claim that's some sort of truth claim, why should I grant you that "truth" exists as you believe it to because as far as I can tell you can't prove truth exists to begin with.
>>85860387Both of these beliefs are perfectly compatible if you're not willfully obtuse and literalist about it.
