It's is super easy to blackmail men.If you are their girlfriend or wife, you just tell them you'd think it'd be hot if they slept with your best girlfriend.After they do, you claim you never gave them permission to do so. Nobody will believe the guy.And then you pressure him to do more depraved stuff. People assume getting blackmailed only happens to people who are already morally corrupt - no. It's super easy to blackmail people. Especially for women.
>>545195776It is not. A lot of people will just ignore it>t. intel agency blackmail victim
>>545195776So someone fucked your wife and now your pretending it gives you power over them?
>>545195871>t. schizophrenic who thinks social workers are part of the CIA's secret nordic branch Uh huh okay anon
>>545195871If you have a wife or girlfriend who keeps begging you to bang her best girlfriend - which man will say no?Imagine it's already a few years into the relationship. Maybe you even have a child already.She says stuff like: Oh anon i saw that one porn video, the guy looked just like you and the woman looked just like Josephine my best girlfriend. he was so rough and josy likes it rough too and i know she's already into you and i just can't it get out of my head. The guy looked so masculine...
>>545195946KEK
>>545195924Isn't that a house of cards scene?There's also a scene were Frank provokes a guy until he snaps and breaks his nose. Because it's illegal to break noses, he's thereafter blackmailed. You can keep provoking people until somone misbehaves - and now you have a blackmailed mole inside a political party.Why does dumb shit like mass migration and circumcision keep going? Doesn't it feel as if many people are blackmailed? If women are heavily involved in blackmail (the children on Epstein Island had mothers) wouldn't that explain circumcision not being made illegal?
>>545195871Blackmail tends to get ignored, yeah. The Russian kompromat style doesn't even really work, that's just how Russians seem to work. >>545195946Social Workers are feds.
>>545195956Dude i dont give a fuck about your fetishI just want to talk about me
>>545195924>So someone fucked your wife and now your pretending it gives you power over them?You've seen with which fervor some people pursue political issues? Including cucks?Well the best girlfriend could also be single though.
>>545196069This. MICE is pretty accurate.>Money>Ideology>Compromise (or coercion)>EgoComrpomise through blackmail is a bad arrangement. With homosexuality being normalised i doubt there is a lot of it still going on.
Your ancestors made painting of Sirens - women who tempt men to lure them into death.Well, if you are blackmailed and have to do stuff you don't want to - that's a little bit like dying, right?Imagine that was exactly what OP describes: a woman gives you permission and encouragement to sleep with her best girlfriend. And thereafter she pretends she never did. She claims to be the victimized modest chaste christian woman.
It can also happen like: Oh you are into femdom? Well wouldn't it be far more exciting if i had a little embarrassing video of you? then you'd had to really do whatever i want... Oh wouldn't that make the femdom that much more genuine and thrilling?You know a bunch of men will fall for that. The children involved in blackmail sex cults all had mothers. There's reasons why rich people just kinda let it happen when their son is transitioned or mutilated.
Here's a painting of a boy (cupid) with the plump ass of an adult woman. A satyr enters the scene. The mother is pretending to be asleep. Does it feel as if your ancestors tried to tell you something?Everyone is naked... look at that ass of the boy. That's not the ass of a real infant. They made it as obvious as humanely possible. And again: the mother is pretending to be asleep!!!
>>545195776If you're dumb enough to fall for that then you kinda deserve to get blackmailed, sorry.
>>545196759Shit painting. Perspective is all off and what kind of shit-for-brains would give Odysseus a Phrygian Cap? Utter nonsense.
>>545195776>Nobody will believe the guy.Who gives a fuck? The people who matter to him would believe the guy. Also, people don’t care that much if a guy cheated, the worst that will happen is gossip unless he works in a profession where they fire him for it.Women CAN, however, use rape accusations, and that’s something that can genuinely ruin a guy’s life.
>>545195776Can you blackmail a suicidal incel chud who has no friends or family and gives no fucks about anyone or anything though?
>>545196759I brace my arms with my sheets to keep the succibi off me
>>545198645All you’d have to do is bait her into texting you about how she wants you to do it so you have proof. Also in general, one of the things chuds need to realize is that a relationship with a woman will never work out unless you’re willing to walk away from it.
>>545199503There's multiple Johnny Depp movies we will never see because a woman made accusations.
Goyim won't do shit
>>545198645>If you're dumb enough to fall for that then you kinda deserve to get blackmailed, sorry.Who'd resist their own wife or girlfriend begging them to sleep with her best girlfriend?Only to right after pretend to be a modest and chaste Christian who'd never tolerate a cheating husband. >>545199958>All you’d have to do is bait her into texting youAnytime someone refuses to write something down on paper, you can't trust them.And women do a lot of dumb social games.
You can't blackmail someone without also condemning their actions.When someone claims fucking a 17 year old is just the same as fucking a 7 year old...Imagine the guys who are blackmailed listen to this. They realize that person can convince others that banging a 17 year old is already like raping a child... if they banged idk a 14 year old they know they are now in deep trouble. It will make their heart race.Some people who preach in public (today that's many feminists) are blackmailers.
Sounds silly - but you know how some women claim that wanting women to shave is pedophilia? That's asinine, right?Now imagine they blackmailed men who banged an underage girl (maybe 16).And... well imagine they watch her videos were she claims various seemingly random things are pedophilia...Imagine it's a bitch who wants to blackmail you to lick her ampit hair and worse.Oh - and to keep circumcision going because they are petty as fuck.
>>545203843my wife tried this until I told her to shave the pits or my beard was getting shaved. she takes more pride in my billy gibbond wannabe beard than I do.never saw the cunt move so quickly in my life. its like the married couples version of mutually assured destruction. except only one side cares. pro tip: i give no fucks at all times.
>>545204015Women take joy in stuff which is kinda disgusting yet not erotic.Like amy schumer - she talks non-stop about sex. Yet it isn't erotic.I think it's their intrasexual competition. They know other women get envious if they like sex too much. But they still sex and kink... so they do this weird and dumb shit. Oh and they love to be petty too.
>>545195956I would unironically call her a cuck
>>545205652What a challenge it is to talk for hours about sex - yet somehow be boring.It's intentional. Women are envious, they attack digital tits in a video game if they are too big. But they still have a sexuality and perversion... so they express their sexuality in a way which doesn't make other women envious - and that's usually achieved by being repulsive to men.That's kinda a different topic. But not entirely. If women blackmail men - they use it to be petty. Including circumcision. They know men dislike it. Men can enjoy sexual sadism, they can be masochistic... that one they dislike. Again: it's a real challenge to talk for hours about sex, yet not be exciting to a male audience. Women are actively pursuing what is sexual or sadomasochistic - yet not enjoyed by men. Mostly to not offend other women. They are kinda mental in this pursuit.
>>545205736Many cucks pursue political issues with zealousy.They wouldn't hesitate to cuckold themselves if that advances their political cause.You can assume many powerful and influential men would speak out against feminism or circumcision if they weren't entrapped. That's far more reasonable to assume, than to assume they can't read statistics or notice trends.It's wrong to assume everyone is dumber than you are - it's more reasonable to assume they were blackmailed.
>>545195776Black maling your girlfriend, your wife, and your mother is easy.Provide black male, watch as OP gets cucked.Easy.
>>545205736For women who get older - blackmailing their husband (and also forcing him to do political stuff on her behalf) can feel safer.They may worry that as they get older, their husband may prefer a younger wife anyway.Thus why not encourage him ere that happens, such that you have evidence of him "cheating"? Women feel very different about this than men anyway. Even if they are seldom open about it. They care more about say financial safety than loyalty.
There's a bunch of men who just kinda let their wife transition their boy.Who refuse to speak out against very obvious problems in society. You shouldn't assume that these men are too stupid to recognize problems or read statistics. Or that they wouldn't prefer their affluent son to impregnate a bunch of women rather than to be turned into one.Especially not if they are otherwise successful or intelligent. It's much more reasonable to assume that they were blackmailed. And you should assume that women who are rich all like to gossip and befriend each other. And share tips and stuff.And women do not care about loyalty the same way men do. I mean - you can easily find feminists on Twitter who have contempt for men who desire a virgin or who aren't willing to enter an open relationship. What you desire as a man - women have open contempt for. Not all, but far more than you'd be willing to believe.Women simply feel different about this. And this leads to different thought processes and different solutions.
>>545206974>And you should assume that women who are rich all like to gossip and befriend each other. And share tips and stuff.If you look at women's magazines... doesn't it kinda feel that way?If one woman found a way to blackmail her husband and now he's forced to go along with whatever she wants, support feminism on Twitter, humiliate himself in public, let her be a tyrant towards the children...Wouldn't you expect her to share how she did this with her best friends? While keeping it secret. Just like Epstein Island once used to be a secret, then became an open secret, and eventually public knowledge?
If one woman found a successful strategy and it lead to more feminism... you should 100% expect her to share it and keep repeating it to further feminism in society at large. They care much more about feminism than the wellbeing of their own sons. (that one is flat out evident)OF COURSE if they found some very simple strategies to blackmail guys - they would share it with all their friends, their inner circle - and keep doing it, until it goes way out of hand. They'd even pressure other women to go along.Tell me that isn't OBVIOUSLY what women would do. Especially certain kind of women.
Do you know why muslims made rules like: you need 4 witnesses if you accuse someone of adultery / rape?Because it's easy to make accusations. And it's easy to blackmail people.In a functional society you don't need such dumb rules and these rules are obviously exploited in the other direction too. Like: men rape and the woman has no witnesses. But: there's reasons why they came up with such rules to begin with. Women have large friend circles.If a woman found a successful strategy to blackmail her husband - she will 100% share this with all of her inner circle.This is why historically some societies forbad women from socializing all-together.
>>545207926>This is why historically some societies forbad women from socializing all-together.Multiple societies did this.You know Hollywood has problems. Child rape, people sleeping with employees.You know politics at large has such issues.What people under-estimate is the role women play in this. Women have much larger friend circles than men. They spend less time playing video games and more time socializing. - And if you want to blackmail people, you need to be good at socializing.You should 100% assume blackmail cults to be largely driven by women. Again: historically many societies made it outright illegal for women to socialize. This wasn't mere jealousy.
>>545195776did you learn this from that Meta Intent video?used to be required viewing. idk what happened to him after that amazing series like 7 years ago
But you must understand that you cannot blackmail someone without social norms and taboos.In fact: the stricter social norms are, the more serious and threatening any blackmail is. In fact: as blackmail becomes a more serious issue, you should kinda see two things happening simultaneously:People who argue that the stuff they (or their friends) did wasn't that bad. Say, bang a 14 year old.People who argue that this stuff was incredibly bad.And both sides should kinda push for an extreme and be unreasonable. Because it's about blackmail. It's not about what is common sense, it's not about what is best for people. It's about either increasing the pressure which blackmail has over people, or releasing that pressure.PS: you sure notice that recent-ish feminists began to become ever more strict in their social and sexual norms. Feminists once used to be kinky and exciting... well here's the other thing: you cannot blackmail people without temptation either.Thus as blackmail issues get more serious, you get the weirdest combination of: Preaching, condemnation, arguing in favor of making everything legal, making legal stuff illegal - and temptation. All right next to each other. All in ever bigger extremes.But you will not get common sense.
In a society ruled by blackmail, you will see churches right next to strip clubs and taverns.You cannot blackmail people without both temptation and condemnation. They must co-exist.You notice a society which has a blackmail issue by it refusing to let common sense reign. By an increasing amount of people in denial of reality.
>>545195776I was expecting a jew giving actual good advice seeing you are using a memeflag, but it seems like you are a Pajeet. You were so close, but so far. You introduce a man to a hot 19 yo college girl who is horny for him. You record them sexting and fucking, and afterwards you tell the man that the girl was actually 17 all along. That's how the Epstein's Mossad operation worked.
>>545208838People who blackmail others do both:They preach and condemn.They tempt and lure.In a society without balance and common sense, it's most reasonable to assume that it has heavy problems with blackmail.If there's people with whom you try to argue, you show them statistics (mass migration, gender paygap, whatever it is) and they are in flat out denial of reality - do not assume that they are dumb. Assume they are entrapped.You should assume by now the biggest deniars of reality already received hundreds of user comments, user e-mails, youtube links. They are fully aware.Blackmail is a much bigger issue than you are aware.
>>545208928Yes, that works. But that will not work with men who are loyal or who desire intimate relationships. Say: who'd rather pursue a smart college educuated girl who can engage in interesting conversations.Such men exist.But such men can be easily talked into banging their wife's best girlfriend (if it's the wife itself who keeps encouraging them). For that to work, obviously their wife has to be in on it. Say: a honeytrap.Or just a wife who has the wrong girlfriends. No shortage of women who will talk other women into doing stuff which is bad for a relationship.
Right now in society it's feminist who express this. They tempt - many feminists are overly sexual, support BDSM. And they condemn.They will drag you to the HR department for as much as a joke. This obviously lends itself to blackmail.Whenever you see this particular combination: Temptation and condemnation - and especially if the condemnation feels arbitrary, unfair and irrational - you can safely assume blackmail.You cannot blackmail people without condemning their actions. They will not get blackmailed without temptation.They will claim it's not a moral issue one day, the next day it's the worst thing in the world. (that's right after someone got freshly blackmailed).
Someone who's mostly interested in blackmailing others will not find any issue in changing ideology.Say: switch from "sex work is feminism" hooker to anti-sex feminism or even towards chaste Christian woman. Or islam (many feminists ally with islam.)Why? Because if she's now a chaste christian woman who condemns sex - well condemning sex will work better against any men she (or her friends) blackmailed previously.
The stricter social norms are, the easier it is to blackmail.That's why feminists side with Islam. On the surface, these are polar opposites.Feminists know that you cannot easily blackmail the regular white guy for having been pegged or engaged in wife-swapping, group-sex etc.They know in an islamic culture, you absolutely can ruin a guys reputation with these simple perversions.
We do a lot of mass migration.Have you ever seen infantile leftist twitter accounts which are pro LGBTQ - yet they shame conservatives by calling them gay and such?There's obvious hypocrisy in there. Well, imagine there's blackmail involved. A proper old school conservative can be blackmailed if he sucked a dick. That blackmail will not work if he isn't occasionally reminded of his perversion.Whenever you see a strange combination of insults and condemnation and temptation or encouragement - assume blackmail is involved. And suddenly the behavior of that person will make more sense.
Feminists will shame men's sexuality for everything. Approaching women, desiring younger women, wanting a daily blowjob, wanting sex. Watching porn. Looking at women.Yet they support sex work, transitioning children - oh but also islam. And and and.It's quite hypocritical and irrational, right?Well, not if you assume they have men blackmailed who did some things wrong. Suddenly them going online day after day talking about how men are just repulsive and should feel ashamed makes a lot of sense.
>>545195776Slave mentality if you can empathize with this mindset. You can go along with it if you like depraved shit, but you gotta cut a bitch when they misunderstand the terms.
There's more than enough men who'd willingly agree to be spanked or whipped by a woman. What can a woman possibly use blackmail for?Well - by still finding stuff which repulses some men. And of course to make them say stuff on Twitter which in reality they disagree with. Or transitioning their son. That's why among feminists you see a lot of... slightly repulsive stuff. And they will call that "empowering".
Historically, women were depicted being cruel towards children. And eventually we burned women who were cruel towards children (we accused them of being witches).If women would run a blackmail cult, how would they use it?
If you look at this once popular tik tok - you can clearly see that the guy doesn't look that happy about the situation. She's clearly enjoying it.Women can be incredibly petty. We put systems in place which prevent men from addressing obvious issues or reigning in. Why?You assume - especially when you are young - that it's because everyone else must be too stupid to notice obvious problems. That's wrong. You must stop assuming other people are stupid. It makes more sense to assume that they are blackmailed.Well either that - or they are the ones blackmailing others indulging in pettiness.
You look at old christian era art - say cupid and venus paintings. Or other myths like eros and psyche:Despite being massive prudes at that time, they saw no issue painting women like this with infants.The children on Epstein Island had mothers.
>>545195776Just be a moral person for fuck sakes. Don't do stupid shit that gives someone leverage on you. In any aspect of your life.
And then you pressure him to do more depraved stuff.such as
Christians painted women whipping (!) naked and blindfolded infants.Yet it was a taboo for a young adult guy to receive a blowjob from a young adult woman. (you could be jailed for that. It was called "sodomy laws")Just like feminists today: They made stuff which is normal and vanilla a taboo (say approaching women). While making degenerate things... seem so normal, you could just hang them up as a painting.Well - in the christian era people pretended this right here wasn't what it so very obviously is. They played dumb.PS: teenagers play dumb when they are caught. Stop assuming these people are dumb. Assume they PLAY dumb. They act. They act dumb. They are not. They are only acting dumb.That's why you cannot reach them with arguments.
>>545213017>And then you pressure him to do more depraved stuff.>such asToday it's Epstein Island. I bet there's even worse stuff out there.Historically, you can look at christian era paintings.At times you got the same combination which feminism does today: Condemning natural male sexuality - while posting stuff which is obvious degeneracy.
>>545213017If you remember Pizzagate - there was one artist who got quite a lot of attention. Because Tony Podesta owned multiple of her paintings.And... her paintings are weird. Like: children who look as if they were just spanked sitting on the bottom of an emptied swimming pool.Artist is female by the way. Her name is Biljana Đurđević’s
>>545213512Here's another very creepy painting from that female artist. I think people under-estimate to what extend women are involved.
>>545214074Nice try rabbi
>>545214074>>545213512This is the author of these paintings.To be fair: she claims on her website she's just trying to bring awareness... i don't know her well enough to tell.But that's an unusual thing to have awareness of.
>>545214259And if someone blackmails... you should expect them to be in the role of the person who condemns. While tempting too.It's not blackmail without both.
>>545195956I want to be raped by an anime office milf
Amber heard looks very white. Yet she did endless chutzpah in court.
>>545195776No. I then dump the bitch, and keep fucking her girlfriend. Who was hotter anyway.
>>545214479>I want to be raped by an anime office milfYou think so. I understand.But you do not want to be forced to clean the office toilet after your male coworker was on it or be dragged through the HR department of hell because the day after you posted something on Twitter that bitch dislikes.Christians call it "Lust" and they condemn it as a sin. These bitches toy with your imagination to get you blackmailed. They know you fantasize about this stuff - but the reality is entirely different.
>>545214259Notice how drawings have her face.
>>545214605>No. I then dump the bitch, and keep fucking her girlfriend. Who was hotter anyway.And that's why the very people who desire to blackmail people seek strict social norms. That's why it's a taboo for very influential men to act this way.A rich influential man could be a giga-chad who bangs multiple women. Who's seen on camera with a bunch of women. But they aren't. Ok some have a new wife every few years. But: they still only bang one woman at a time.Not like the japanese samurai who had concubines. They no longer impregnate multiple women at once. At least not officially. People made a social game up which declared this a taboo. Now: part of that is relying on envy. It's unfair if rich men can bang multiple women and you can't. But i bet in japan the average man had more sex than men do in the west, let alone prude middle east.
I fap to my wife's porn history unironically. Its very random
You just know it's really difficult to convince a proper Christian woman to try shibari. Christian women once demanded sodomy laws - men could go to jail for receiving a blowjob. Later this was eased up - they made oralsex legal but you could still go to jail for analsex with a woman.Meanwhile in japan they had small harems and they made bondage into an art form. You know their women are very different from say middle eastern women.When women made it a social taboo for rich and influential men to have more than one wife - they relied on your envy. And i do think nobody desires mega harems like they had in the middle east. But the flipside is that it became very difficult to have sex or children with a regular woman.Like dead bedrooms you bet are more common in the middle east and other prude countries.
There is behavior which is not christian - yet you recognize it immediately as white.It is the opposite of strict social norms. Which by the way are plenty in the middle east.Like: the middle east made bacon illegal, but not marrying a 9 year old. They didn't make bacha bazi illegal (raping boys). Well - it's sorta a legal greyzone in some islamic countries.
>>545213019Only 3 things can give you knowledge; words, observations, and experience.A lesson doesn't have to follow that order, but it's the nicest order. Experience is the only one with a tuition paid in blood; if you need to be the experience, you can bypass these games by completing your task collecting your bills is the most important step of being the experience. Playing dumb is just begging to go back to words.Fail to do that and everything else you're saying becomes very correct.It's not as safe as you think, that is why they gave that theatre of killing epstein to give outsiders an observation. I don't think he broke the terms so he might still be alive, but they put a lot of work in to give us that observation, you shouldn't miss it that can get expensive.
>>545215603>they relied on your envyThe middle east had the worst of both worlds. It had mega harems, while the average guy didn't have sex. They made gay sex illegal too for good measure.The reason a regular man supports monogamy is because he wants a wife for himself - And it feels fair. But in prude monogamous countries the regular man eventually struggles to have sex all-together.In japan the people were kinky. The top 1% had small harems. The average guy was married. The bottom 5% or so visited brothels. It was eugenic. They are polite, high IQ, high trust, innovative.There's very few prudes in japan. And plenty of prudes in the middle east.
>>545195956>>545205736You have to leave the woman in this case. She is only giving you permission to cheat because she has given herself permission to cheat. End women's rights and marry girls between 12-14 years.
Japan made a plethora of culture and fiction. Pac-Men, super mario, Zelda, Sonic, One Piece, Son Goku, Studio Ghibli, harem animes, romantic tearjerker animes. Lots of great music too.Meanwhile middle east: Nothing.Ok. Maybe 1001 nights and Alladin. Those are ancient.The middle east doesn't create.It creates no fiction. There is little music you listen to made by muslims. Very few of their countries innovate technology.Prudes don't create.
>>545216743The middle east has no shortage of dumb social games. Like: bacon is illegal. Feast days. 1001 rules what you can eat when. Sexual norms. Helal vs Kosher.They don't create, but they play all these social games. Which is incredibly effeminate. These effeminate and contradictory social games are used to entrap people. It's very often driven by envy.The people who tell you these social games improve society are flat out wrong. Yes, you need some. But they should be guided by common sense. Japan had social norms - it was in many ways a very conservative country. The Samurai were warriors. Warrior nobility even.But they were sexually very liberal.
And women know that some men will not be shamed into submission for having had sex. They will just own it. Maybe even brag about it.Thus women desire systems and laws to still coerce these men. They want to be able to drag these men through family court.And eventually they will gaslight society into thinking it'd be better off with these effeminate social games. This includes effeminate conservative influencers praising monogamy and prudishness.
There's no proof that the Epstein thing had anything to do with 'blackmail' in the first place. It's a stupid theory because you can only use your blackmail once, after that the blackmailed person ends up ratting out everyone else because he's already fucked so he's going to take the blackmailers down with him. Same as when a mafia falls apart. So you'd only be able to use your blackmail once.This has never happened with Epstein's associates.
>>545217967Epstein didn't kill himself. Right?Aside from that: Imagine what happens behind the scenes is so over the top, nobody would believe you. If you had talked about Epstein Island as a theory 2 decades ago, you would had sounded like someone with schizophrenia.Look at Christian era Paintings:>>545213019 or >>545213218 >>545212824 >>545212395>>545198427
>>545217967Let me give you some insight:Japanese Buddhist monks fucked 12 year old boys for 1000 years. This was an official Rule. They wrote it down on paper. You can read it on wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chigo you can read it in museums.Today, buddhist monks have a reputation for being entirely abstinent.Within just one or two generations, buddhist monks went from: Official rule to fuck both holes of 12 year old boys (OFFICIAL RULE - written down) to: monks never have sex in their life.Do you realize how many people pretend right along?
When netflix makes show wherein Kings are "Black, gay and disabled" they are re-writing history.Look at how through rewriting history in people's minds can be. The Japanese had an official rule (not a secret, it was official) to rape 12 year old boys. They had to provide both holes. Sometimes to multiple monks. They were not allowed to refuse!!!And today monks have a reputation for being entirely abstinent. Ok. That's how thorough you can rewrite history. You can pretend people who spend 1000 years raping boys never had sex.To be fair: The monks were super gentle. The official scrolls have description about using warming oils, lube, small dildos, asking them repeatedly if they feel ready and such.But the boy were not allowed to refuse. Pretending that monks never had sex is an effeminate social game.
>>545219038They stored lube and dildos in buddhist temples. Officially.This goes entirely contrary to ANY modern depiction of buddhist monks. What happened and what people think happened can be polar opposites. Even if there's written evidence. And it's not even difficult to find: https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/A_2013-3001-1PS: Pretending nobody ever had sex. Doesn't that feel effeminate? Because men would rather brag about having sex, right? Religion is all about pretending people never have sex.Religion is far more female dominated behind the scenes than people are aware.Reality can be so contrary to your notions and cultural assumptions that people telling you the truth can sound outright schizophrenic. And you must understand just how many people play along. Ok: entire movie studios today pretend that monks never had or have sex. Yet in reality - at least in japan they thoroughly dicked 12-18 year old boys. They dressed them up as females and used both holes. Sometimes ran trains on them.
>>545218545Sounds like a bunch of kike delusions, like the whole "greeks were gay" thing. Wikipedia doesn't prove shit nigger go fuck yourself. Nigger kike faggot, marxist son of a bitch kike I'll kill you
Now why is Japan today pretending monks never have sex? Just like Christians pretend nobody ever had sex? Like: you can be pregnant without having had sex?Imagine there's a female supremacy sex cult which originated in the middle east. And it's fully aware that you need to play dumb social games to entrap influential men to further your retarded dumb intrasexual competition. Like: they want to kill sluts who hand out free blowjobs.Does that sound fucking lunatic? Yes. But japan is a much nicer place than the middle east in every aspect. Yet everyone tells you we need to become more prudish like the middle east. ...Decades ago, if you had talked about Epstein Island you would had sounded like a schizophrenic person.Today people tell you it's perfectly normal that rich people own a mansion with multiple bedrooms and cars, yet they never impregnate or bed more than one woman at a time.To accept the lunacy of what actually happens behind the scenes, you must realize how fucking lunatic the fake reality is they try to sell you.Like: they tell we are pursuing gender equality, while mutilating boys. And you cannot adress this - because they play dumb effeminate social games.
>>545219459You sound like a tranny spreading its filth.YWNBAW
>>545219855Speaking of tranny...
>>545219855The Christians have multiple transvestite Saints which are official Canon.This picture here is Saint Wilgefortis. She's not canon anymore. But for a while she was more popular in parts of europe than virgin Mary.Christians in europe used to have depictions of a beared "lady" - bascially a man in drag. On a crucifix. And they treated him/her as a Saint on par with Virgin Mary.
>>545220163Here's another photo of "Saint Wilgefortis".It's a man in drag. Ok... Reality is so much more absurd than you think it is. It's run by a female supremacy sex cult. And much of religion is part of it. And they are behind transitioning boys. And arranging for them to be raped. Like this: >>545198427And they love mutilating them too.And to achieve this - they blackmail men. In particular they go after promising and influentiall men. They sniff them out long in advance. And they realized the best way to blackmail men is to act like massive prudes, make it difficult to have sex or children. And once they have power - to shame and kill sluts and to blame the sluts for all the mischief which they cause.You can almost safely assume that every single person who refuses to speak out against circumcision has been entrapped one way or another. I mean it.
>>545221180Saint Appoloaris is still canon. Officially. With Feast days and everything. Both Orthodox and Catholic: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollinaris_SyncleticaShe's a transvestite. She dressed up like a man. Later was accused of raping her own sister.Christianity has multiple official Saints which are women pretending to be men. Some got into high ranking positions.I know how fucking asinine this sounds. It's a blackmail sex cult run by women. If you want more children in your life than a single wife can provide, you must agree to be blackmailed. (that's religion).Then you either publicly advance feminism or Christianity.Many children will be used to blackmail yet other men in other ways.
I forgot the name. But there's another official Saint (canonized) which is yet another woman dressing up as a man.And... it's kinda implied she just had sex with everyone to become bishop (!!!) Like one day she opened the bible, and it randomly fell on a line about serving everyone on your knees and stuff...A lot of these Saint stories have some sexual innuendo or undertones.PS: Most of these Saints were prescribed Sainthood because OFFICIALLY they remained a virgin for life. Even if they always found themselves in weird and compromising situations. Like being accsued of raping their own sibling....Every single person who refuses to speak out against circumcision you can assume to be entrapped one way or another.
Here's a Transvestite Saint who kept sharing the same bedroom as her father.Everyone pretended she was a virgin for life. That's why she was officially a Saint. Despite being in an all male monastery, sleeping in the same bedroom as her father.Wearing male clothing. Pretending to be a man. The only biological woman in an all-male place. Highly educuated men in that place.... do you think this can possibly tie into blackmail?Every single person who refuses to speak out against circumcision you can assume to be entrapped one way or another. And it's much easier to blackmail people than you think.
The very people who are behind transitioning boys (at large) - are also the ones who shame men for being bisexual, gay or cross-dressing.How does this make sense? Because they are not after common sense or logical consistency. They are after blackmailing and entrapping men.To blackmail you need both: Temptation (or encouragement) and public condemnation.They are utterly ASININE and MENTAL in their pursuit of this. And it's to a large extend women's intrasexual competition going awry. While being petty and power hungry.You can safely assume that every single person who refuses to speak out against circumcision is entrapped one way or another by this. And it's far easier to blackmail people than you think.
The prude muslims have stuff like "Bacha Bazi". They make up hypocritical rules: like they say until he has began to grown a beard he's to be considered a girl and it's not gay. This hypocrisy makes sense once you realize it's all about blackmail. Say the boy after a few years of being raped begins to enjoy his prostate being pounded... well now he's at an age were being fucked is illegal. If he becomes an adult who enjoys analsex after being fucked for years - well now it's illegal for him.That is obviously fucked up. How does it make sense? Just imagine it's run by a female supremacist blackmail cult without morality. They love blackmail. They realize blackmail is easier with hypocrisy. And yes, also with instilling fetishes while they are young.Oh and they are petty and sadistic. Any person who manages to condemn both circumcision and mass migration you can safely assume is not part of this. Starting a conversation about these things and checking if the other person is capable of common sense and empathy is the easiest way to find out.
People can look at this painting and claim it isn't what it is. While condemning young men for approaching women roughly their age.How widespread do you think blackmail is?It's far more widespread than you'd be willing to believe. Anytime you spot hypocrisy - suspect blackmail. Don't assume these people are stupid. Assume they are ACTING stupid.
One of the biggest hypocrisies in our time is constantly advancing and preaching gender equality and consent.While refusing to properly condemn circumcision and to make it illegal.Why are so many people reluctant? Because it is far easier to blackmail people than you realize. And it's far more widespread than you are willing to believe.And religion at large is driven by a female supremacist cult which plays dumb, effeminate social games. A big part of that is acting prude - the other part is playing dumb.And they get away with it.
The women of whites and japanese are different.These women do stuff which women from the middle east would never do. The people who shame them for it are wrong. But women like this can still end up blackmailed - yet they are inherently different from the women who founded this female supremacist sex blackmail cult.... but you can see how they would easily fall for a sex cult.The best way to find out if they did - is to just to ask them about their take on making circumcision illegal. You don't want to end up blackmailed yourself. Religions "convert" people after all. So do blackmail cults which are not religious.
>>545195776blackmail works better on the rich this is because the wealthier people are, the more dishonest they are and the greater the psychological pressure they experience as a resulton the other hand, it does not work at all on people who have nothing
>>545226313Kinda true. They like to target promising people ere they get rich though.Say - people who just released a music album. A gal in the publishing company might try to seduce them and stuff. You heard about lots of perverted stuff say in regards to Bieber and other singers happening behind the scenes.They are good at targeting people who are promising. And at gatekeeping.
You have to understand how massive religion is. Every company has someone religious in them. Yes - not all are blackmailed. I just want you to understand the scale of this.There's so many who play dumb.But not by any means is it so many you can't fight back. And surprisingly, they kinda let you fight. You shouldn't be demoralized after all of this.PS: Buddhists teach people to not be afraid of death. Buddhism is kinda different from other religions. Lots of good advice.I know that sounds random, it isn't.
>>545226436a con artist was once caught in south korea after blackmailing dozens of corporate executives via email and phonehe claimed that, despite having no actual evidence, he simply threatened to send their wives and families photos which did not exist purporting to show the men having affairs with other women remarkably, dozens of these executives ended up transferring sums ranging from thousands to tens of thousands of dollars into his bank account
>>545226902Makes sense. Some people will do stuff like that - but for political causes rather than money. And women are the ones who can actively seduce these men. It sure feels as if women are becoming increasingly political.
Rich people own mansions - sometimes with multiple bedrooms and bathrooms.It's kinda asinine that we all pretend no rich person ever wants to have multiple women live in his big mansion. The Samurai had concubines. Even Christian clergy used to have concubines until 1550. It can't be that difficult to ask a few women working at starbucks if they want to live in a mansion, have children - and those children will be sent to an expensive private school.You'd think at least some random bitcoin millionaires would've done something like that. Instead they all only have one wife - and maybe a second one they cheat on.... and when they are caught with the second wife, we pretend it's a big scandal.Instead of asking ourselves why they aren't living with 5 women each.
If this was a religious symbol hanging everywhere, would it be considered sexist?
I notice my grammar is slacking as i get tired. I hope people who consider this thread worthwhile will archive it.
If there was a woman hating sex cult which uses blackmail... wouldn't it have a symbol like that?And... if there was no porn, but there was a big building in the middle of the town - and it displayed half-naked women in bondage being tortured... would you visit it?It's almost depressingly obvious. Once pointed out.
>>545226902I used to get emails blackmailing me for looking at pr0n of "teens" a lot. I just deleted them. Everyone who isn't retarded knows that these sites advertise "teens" who are older than that or even if they are 18, that's legal."ExploitedBlackTeens" used to star Candace Von and Vanessa Blue and I'm pretty sure both of them were 35 when they were on that site. I wasn't even 35 then
