[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
4chan
/po/ - Papercraft & Origami

Name
Options
Comment
Options


Gimmicks


PEE text
My Bans
Verification
File

    08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
    05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
    10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
    [Hide] [Show All]




    File: file.png (713 KB, 640x852)
    713 KB PNG
    Why isn't anyone using papercraft as skin for 3D printed stuff?
    >>
    a years-old thread died for this zoomer shit
    >>
    File: shhh no more.png (395 KB, 500x339)
    395 KB PNG
    >>627274
    Oh no, I'm sure it was full of useful boomer replies fetishizing the board's inactivity and kvetching about the rise of newfangled applications, tools and materials like the use of wood pulp paper instead of honorabur rice paper folded a gōrirrion timesu by master rice pounders who spent decades toiling as apprentices boiling rice to perfection before spending another watching the masters pound said rice, bowed of course in a display of utmost servitude
    >>
    >>627274
    They should all die off when their usefulness ends.
    >>
    >>619826
    I figured you would use the same 3D model, once converted to STL for 3D print and once unfolded in Pepakura. Then just glue the paper on the 3D model (like decoupage). You could paint but some stuff has complex textures, like chainmail.

    Just needed some model for the post but it's this:
    https://www.deviantart.com/rk-crafts/art/The-Amazing-Digital-Circus-Pomni-Papercraft-989599995
    >>
    >>619826
    yeah but they mostly suck at it.
    >>
    >>627273
    For complex prints, it'd be hard to get paper to fit, some sort of heat-forming plastic skin would be better. For simpler prints, printing at all would be unnecessary, you could just fold the paper and be done with it.
    >>
    >>627277
    like >>627279
    said fitting it exactly I think would be hard, especially with anything rounded, youd be better off just making the thing out of paper to begin with
    >>
    File: ram.jpg (650 KB, 2400x1600)
    650 KB JPG
    I fill them full of cement sometimes, kinda same vein.
    >>
    >>627281
    I kinda dig how it deforms in the process
    >>
    File: m.jpg (976 KB, 1512x2016)
    976 KB JPG
    >>627282
    I figured out how to stop that, but sometimes it adds a nice touch.
    >>
    >>627273
    Real answer, because if you're already making the papercraft the 3d printing part is unnecessary.
    >>
    >>627284
    My thread died and dissapeared some time ago but I was having some serious issues with large paper dolls be it due to insensitive handling errors or buckling under its own weight. I tried several methods to remedy such problems but they come with their own set of problems which i can elaborate on later.
    That being saíd, having 3d printed structure (of precise measurements) to suport my models from inside could be costly but potentially an enhancement over internal supports/rough skeleton with stuffing/filling, especially as I want to make them poseable eventually.
    >>
    >pomni
    >>
    File: 1712911571697.png (29 KB, 749x449)
    29 KB PNG
    >>627273
    that's a nice clown
    >>
    File: Teri_Clownworld_Edition.jpg (1.45 MB, 4000x1800)
    1.45 MB JPG
    >>627287
    That's not a paper clown.
    But pic related is.
    >>
    >>627285
    On second thought, you're right. I can see some sort of internal skeleton being beneficial to larger models, whether it's a simplified 3d printed structure, wire, or a cardboard or wooden frame. But just 3d printing an entire low-poly model and pasting paper onto it is dumb as fuck. At that point you might as well forgo paper entirely and invest in some sort of higher quality surface decal.
    >>
    >>627281
    the paper is strong enough to do that?
    >>
    >>627273
    Why cut a skin that's going to look worse than if you painted the model directly?

    Nice craft
    >>
    >>627281
    cool shit nigga
    >>
    >>627274
    grow the fuck up already
    >>
    >>627275
    >"fetishizing"
    >>
    >>627273
    You could use 3d prints as a sort of skeleton or kinda like a mesh for your papercraft but using it as a skin kinda seems unusual or even stupid. It would be easier to just print a full model and then paint it. But it still seems interesting and once i get new filament and get my regular 2d printer to work i might try it given i find such a skin and model.
    >>
    >>627294
    its true tho, they get so pissed off anytime someone makes a new thread instead of commenting in a thread thats a bajillion years old and at bump limit. God forbid people are interested and make threads about papercraft/origami.
    >>
    File: IMG_0286.jpg (2.21 MB, 4032x3024)
    2.21 MB JPG
    >>627290
    No. Encasing it in expanding foam is though.
    >>
    >>627273
    That must have took forever lol.
    You have to glue together tabs at every connection?

    I don't understand the 3D printing part.
    Is it to give structure to the paper?
    >>
    >>627285
    what was the issue with wireframes?
    >>
    >>627283
    how? what material do you use for these? i cant imagine just paper being strong enough
    >>
    >>627289
    Prints of this size are limited by dimentions of print area. While ppl do print lifesize figurines they have to turn model into large number of parts and fit them together post print. While I can't deny difference in methods might seem silly, building doll by gluing plastic bricks together doesn't do it for me.
    >>627299
    If you mean cardboard assembly I worked on I paper doll thread I had only partial succes as I have not included any marking on parts which made fitting it together more or less guess work. Pepakura can be forced to work with model set of parts clipping throuhg one another at 90° angles but doesn't provide any way to mark where and how those parts intersect.
    >>
    >>627286
    How do you do that
    >>
    >>628637
    >How do you do that
    >>
    >>628642
    >>628637
    it was for April fool's
    you can't do that anymore
    >>
    Impossible
    >>
    Are there instructions to this papercraft? Found the post myself, and one of my cousins wants me to make it. Appreciate it
    >>
    >>629114
    https://www.mediafire.com/file/yqq26zxau8a4gpl/Pomni_Papercraft.zip/file
    >>
    >>627274
    This is a funny post.
    BTC
    bc1qtm4rep7kyp2p28hlkfktpnd0j7uew47vnt2mev
    LTC
    ltc1q9xlaysse0mpfwf025esd69kt9zu3md22gh23du
    ETH
    0x6abA18D203520c8F90ca63eE7426a7bC345D98e6
    SOL
    E5ekoiauCR8yiNp451dmuPzhUxo84P5x3m9WJBK5kxZe
    XRP
    r3jYXNdMk2Vz5hXhKCKE9re8uz93JQFG1r
    DOGE
    DSBq5jRWkiwmEh1G7zBwmQDgRkvRr61fmb
    XMR
    85CTwq5wGjWZw5GgzgwZPrHyZxpLXMK5oZSSSk5j4x9w1bpqzisaWAUZYaAPfh6rP2MZJcaFqF1XmEzkw6YCqJSS2Txu6Z8




    Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
    [Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

    [Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

    All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.