[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
4chan
/m/ - Mecha

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Options


Gimmicks


PEE text
My Bans
Verification
File[]

    08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
    05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
    10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
    [Hide] [Show All]




    File: IMG_1222.jpg (259 KB, 1200x793)
    259 KB JPG
    In Battletech we all love being mechwarriors
    They are the poster boys and the cool stompy things
    But we forget about the other guys
    The tanks and other combat vehicles,the infantry and mech killing battle armor, fighters of both air and space, hell might aswell throw in even the space and ocean battleships
    This thread is for these overlooked but brave heroes of the eternal spheroid and clanner wars
    >>
    wasnt there a game where basic tanks and power armor mogged the titular mechwarriors?
    >>
    >>24054677
    iirc the very original battletech ttg they tried to go for gritty realism only to find out that the mechs were pretty useless and vehicles and ATG armed infantry could just easily leg mechs and take out the cockpit so they quickly tweaked the weapon accuracy rules and added conditions for infantry and vehicles to make the mechs viable.
    >>
    >>24054694
    In the very original battletech vehicles had no rules, and in citytech they got an extremely basic statline and were swifly owned by anything. Infantry died in dozens for every single shot. The total warfare rules were like, the third or so attempt, and basically made vehicles into the same thing as mechs with some slight differences. A mech is just the same platform but with more frills and that's it.

    The new, current rules massively simplify them again with a basic "roll or die" check that degrades each time they take damage. They did this because so few players were using vehicles. Battletech has also never had gritty realism. It's a complex simulation, but it's still wildly abstracted. In that era you mentioned, bringing infantry made melee mechs stronger because of initiative stuffing.
    >>
    >>24054738
    >people dont use non mechs most of the time
    We have dinosaur mounted infantry i know the silent masses are evil and retarded but come on man LOOK AT THIS!
    ID HAVE THEM AS A PERMANENT STAY IN MY ARMY!
    >>
    >>24055085
    >we have Avatar at home
    >>
    >>24055085
    living mounts in sci fi is retarded
    >>
    >>24055124
    Rule of cool beats any type of realism any time
    Plus we already had living mounts you idiots and i am not talking about just horses here
    >>
    File: Sentinel_teapot.png (1.01 MB, 720x900)
    1.01 MB PNG
    >>24055144
    giant wolves are retarded. Space wolves are fucking cringe. Mechs and Hover/Bikes are cooler
    >>
    >>24054694
    What a bunch of hack frauds
    >>
    >>24055144
    >Rule of cool beats any type of realism any time
    but oftentimes, cool is codeword for cringe/retarded
    >>
    >>24055124
    You don't need to set up a manufacturing line for horses. If you're colonizing some bumfuck planet where all you have is farmland, breeding horses is much easier than building a megafactory to churn out robo-horses
    >>
    >>24054677
    You're probably thinking of Heavy Gear.
    >>
    File: feddie tank.png (179 KB, 539x312)
    179 KB PNG
    >>24054667
    >>24054694
    In Battletech or Gundam, it seems like tanks always unjustly job. This little guy always tried its best!
    >>
    I'm working on an idea. Years ago I made helicopter for long range harassments attacks. 30 tons and armed with a AC/2 and LRM5.
    I've been reconsidering removing the AC/2 and just putting a larger LRM system on it, at most I can only get an LRM10 on it. Unless using newer tech.
    >>
    File: 1000010945.jpg (278 KB, 707x959)
    278 KB JPG
    >>24054667
    BA not suffering from their own tmm or heat generation makes them a nuisance. vehicles, arty, field guns etc can get away with stuff like this, too. there are lots of nasty ways to bring dangerous guns to the field for the fraction of a mechs cost
    in campaign play we've struggled with dug-in hull-down ppc tanks, suicidal srm carriers, etc. combined arms btech is something else
    >>24055422
    helicopters are a huge pain in the ass if you lack the right weapon or an AA mech. i've seen some precision ammo ac ones really cause issues
    >>
    >>24055835
    Combined arms is the way to go
    Feels like you are commandint a battalion and not just one Lance of mechwarriors
    >>
    >>24054667
    >>>/k/
    >>
    >>24055319
    For making it fun?
    >>
    >>24057439
    If a vehicle is big enough it feels /m/
    >>
    I used to deploy micro armor minis in BT games. T-55s made acceptably good Scorpion substitutes. For more expensive (but still fairly cheap) 'Mech hunters I used Jagdpanthers with LPLs. The advantages of micro armor minis are high levels of detail and modest size. Paint them right and forego a base, and they can be overlooked by a hasty player.

    A big advantage of vehicles is that in general it's easier to modify them. Part of tabletop BT's fun is customizing the minis. Many vehicle variants just swap out turrets and those are easy to make, compared to performing surgery on 'Mechs arms or torsos.
    >>
    >>24054677
    might be thinking of the crysis mod Mechwarrior Living Legends; it has tanks and battle armor, the former can hold their own against mechs and the latter can possibly take one out if the player's really lucky or good
    >>
    >>24059325
    Urge to replay Deserts of Kharak rising...
    >>
    >>24055124
    That's just a fenrisian teenager and his wife
    >>
    >>24059326
    > Paint them right and forego a base, and they can be overlooked by a hasty player
    >can be overlooked by a hasty player

    ah yes, the good ole strategy. cheating.
    >>
    >>24054667
    I've been using the aerospace bsp rules from the new core book. It's neat having an easy way to put asf models on the map. They are fragile as fuck, though. But they're a lot more fun than just using air strike cards.
    >>
    File: Yiff Yaff.jpg (76 KB, 601x373)
    76 KB JPG
    >>24059494
    >>
    >>24059575
    neat, i have yet to try these out. any more thoughts?
    the cards always felt super underwhelming but the old aerospace rules were insane
    >>
    >>24060362
    >any more thoughts?
    If your opponent ignores the aero threat and you go all in on it, you're getting at least one round of hammering his ass from whatever range and direction you choose that he can't do shit about.
    In the spirit of fairness I've got ASF models I can loan out and am willing to make cards for my opponent. In the interest of me keeping the ability to use asf bsp I am more than happy to do that to level the field.
    >>
    >>24061219
    >I've got ASF models I can loan out and am willing to make cards for my opponent
    that's a good attitude, nobody wants to be receiving omnipotent airstrikes without a way to retaliate
    honestly it doesn't sound too different than bringing things like BA. Opponent either has to commit to taking them out or ignore them and eat the damage. probably more threatening than the average trooper squad though
    >>
    BTC
    bc1qtm4rep7kyp2p28hlkfktpnd0j7uew47vnt2mev
    LTC
    ltc1q9xlaysse0mpfwf025esd69kt9zu3md22gh23du
    ETH
    0x6abA18D203520c8F90ca63eE7426a7bC345D98e6
    SOL
    E5ekoiauCR8yiNp451dmuPzhUxo84P5x3m9WJBK5kxZe
    XRP
    r3jYXNdMk2Vz5hXhKCKE9re8uz93JQFG1r
    DOGE
    DSBq5jRWkiwmEh1G7zBwmQDgRkvRr61fmb
    XMR
    85CTwq5wGjWZw5GgzgwZPrHyZxpLXMK5oZSSSk5j4x9w1bpqzisaWAUZYaAPfh6rP2MZJcaFqF1XmEzkw6YCqJSS2Txu6Z8




    Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
    [Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

    [Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

    All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.