[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
4chan
/lit/ - Literature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.




File: Tolstoy.jpg (1.41 MB, 1470x1947)
1.41 MB JPG
Why couldn’t/didn’t he appreciate and acknowledge the genius, the greatness, and the sublimity of Shakespeare?
>>
>>25620799
I don't know why he thought Shakespeare was amoral, when King Lear and Macbeth are the best morality tales ever. This is a sign of Tolstoy himself lacking greatness.
>>
>>25620799
His English was very poor. When he quotes Emerson or Jefferson in his wisdom quotes book he gets them all mangled.
>>
I haven't read any of his non-fiction yet but a lot of good souls get filtered by THE BARD. As Harold Bloom put it, Shakespeare had a bigger impact on history than history did on Shakespeare. A lot of people feel a sense of vertigo or malaise even attempting to consider this.
>>
>>25620799
shakespeare is anglo slop. only eols care about him.
>>
>>25620799
How long do you intend to keep this seething about Tolstoy going, OP?
>>
>>25620799
Professional jealousy.
>>
>>25620799
Tolstoy was born in nobility. He was put off by Shakespeare, because he wrote for the entertainment of the English canaille.
>>
>>25620799
He explained it plenty of times, but basically it was because Tolstoy was a moralist and Shakespeare was nihilistic. Personally, I love both though.
>>
>>25620799
I think some of his critiques are valid but ultimately it comes from Tolstoy's strict Christian outlook and morality. This kind of fundamentalism is the enemy of great art and it's one of the reasons why Tolstoy's later work is of lesser quality than when he was in his prime
>>
Political reasons. Shakespeare represented the Anglo west whose influence in Russian literature / high culture he sought to overthrow in favor of domestic authors
>>
>>25621613
He failed. Miserably.
>>
>>25620799
He was a plotfag
>>
>>25620799
I suggest reading his treatise What Is Art instead of just the Wikipedia article. He lays his reasons out pretty clearly, although you do sound retarded, so you might not understand.
>>
>>25620799
Shakespeare[‘s company of writers and performers] is extremely overrated. The French dramatist are so much better
>>
>>25620799
Nobody is perfect, but Tolstoy is pretty damn close.
>>
>>25622091
By French dramatists, does that include comedians like Moliere?
BTC
bc1qtm4rep7kyp2p28hlkfktpnd0j7uew47vnt2mev
LTC
ltc1q9xlaysse0mpfwf025esd69kt9zu3md22gh23du
ETH
0x6abA18D203520c8F90ca63eE7426a7bC345D98e6
SOL
E5ekoiauCR8yiNp451dmuPzhUxo84P5x3m9WJBK5kxZe
XRP
r3jYXNdMk2Vz5hXhKCKE9re8uz93JQFG1r
DOGE
DSBq5jRWkiwmEh1G7zBwmQDgRkvRr61fmb
XMR
85CTwq5wGjWZw5GgzgwZPrHyZxpLXMK5oZSSSk5j4x9w1bpqzisaWAUZYaAPfh6rP2MZJcaFqF1XmEzkw6YCqJSS2Txu6Z8




Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.