Should I read Byung Chul Han?
Yeah bro give it a crack and report back.
yeah bro smoke some crack and report ACK!
That’s not a crackpipe
>>25617361Sure; his works are quite short. They aren't really groundbreaking, but they're fine. Psychopolitics and Burnout Society are his best, IMO.
>>25617361libs will say "ooooooooooo chinese hegelianism is so cool and diverse" but in reality those two things subvert each other pretty deeply, which causes his actual writing to come off as extremely mid. I recently read Shanzai, and it's a pretty good example of this. He even starts the book with something like "Yeah...Hegel didn't really understand the Chinese like at all....so uh...yeah...mhm." LMAO
>>25617361after reading three of his books: cheap copied claims from other writers, lack of real argument. 21st century but does not work with evidence. at least theyre short. perfect for posing as philosophy
>>25617361the beauty of his prolific works is that if you read one, you will have read them all :)
>>25617361Sure, I read Agony of Eros and it was amusing.
