WIKI ADMIN COME HOMEI don't think it's about the PHP vulnerability or whatever, since I was getting the same timed-out error when trying to edit an article a few days before the news came out. I didn't see any changes to the wiki contents reported leading up to that, so there were no notices about downtime.
No one cares faggot. Archiving imageboard culture is fundamentally wrong in the first place.
we already read all the books mentioned there
>>25614032Uninstall ublock origin and stop leeching the internet and maybe your websites would stay up faggot.
>>25614099No I don't think I will kike
>>25614048Hard disagree, but elaborate.>>25614066I believe it's possible there are books on the /lit/ wiki that zero people (besides the authors) have read in their entirety. But if you've read /lit/'s A Short Fiction Anthology, I'd like to hear about it and save myself the million dollars in shipping.>>25614099The /lit/ wiki didn't run ads. And also >>25614108
>>25614117Damn, posted the wrong one.
>>25614117>didn't run adsIts not about ads. You can still block the majority of ads and kindly allow trusted partner ads to remain without any issues using settings in your browser. It works great for me, and everyone else too, without letting ublock install malware that breaks the functionality of the internet and leeches content from websites trying to serve your interests, which is malicious software overriding user freedom of choice, and as you can see it does not serve your interests, the web goes down little by little until all that's left is reddit & chatgpt.>>25614108Not cool.
>>25614127None of this has to do with why the /lit/ wiki in particular is down, which is what you claimed in the first place. But I appreciate a sophisticated shill, so kudos to whoever wrote your script (whether you realise it's a script or not).
>>25614150Thanks for understanding, I never claimed trainroll xyz went down because OP tried to visit with ublock installed, but its definitely yempting to try uninstalling it and giving the internet a test drive without it, and seeing if that resolves the issue. I also appreciate you understanding that ublock is hollowing out the internet in general and making communities more brittle and less resilient in the long term, and that maybe the original wiki never would have gone down and relied on a less reliable third party backup if ublock and other adblockers weren't eroding the entire net.
>>25614172No.
>>25614204Shan't.
>>25614127>letting ublock install malware that breaks the functionality of the internet and leeches content from websites trying to serve your interests, which is malicious software overriding user freedom of choicenot sure if I really want to fuel your schizophrenia any further but uhh can you be more specific because what you just said makes zero sense whatsoever>>25614048>No one cares faggotyou cared enough to replyI also care>Archiving imageboard culture is fundamentally wrong in the first placeelaborate then, I say preserving the good parts of it somewhere has its merit whether you like it or not
>>25614207lmao gone before I could even see it live. Now to do my duty of preserving schizo board culture.
>>25614210>can you be more specificOk. When you use the internet there is a bunch of agreements happening between users and content servers that the user gets free content in exchange for seeing ads and subjecting himself to cookies and fingerprinting from advertisers and pinkerton agents. There is no other way to get users to generate value. Nobody is paying you for the pleasure of allowing you to look at japanese literature charts. All websites can stay online only by selling ads. People think they do not want the ads and use whatever is easiest to block them all instead of having the self moderation to pay attention to what they are browsing and just avoid malicious sites or weigh the pros and cons of doomscrolling. With blanket content filtering they are leeching all content like a parasite stripping all capability to generate value from the internet and making it brittle, so the only people who can stay up are censorious big tech sites, and ephemeral low effort scam and spam content. Same thing is happening in publishing but good luck to me convincing perpetually amoral grey pills on here to pay for books or care about anything for more than two weeks.
>>25614253Faggot.
>>25614270Thank YOU for paying for MY web browsing with YOUR personal data AND attention, friend :)
>>25614270>agreements that you get to see shit for free in exchange for viewing ads and paying with your dataI personally never agreed to anything of that kindI will consent to essential cookies (that are not bad in principle, for instance that's how 4chan remembers your theme, but they can be used in other ways) and all the necessary scripts for the website to work properly and that's it, if someone wants to get tracked and fingerprinted without doing anything about it then it's their choice, most people genuinely don't care so a minority of users that use an adblock is not that big of a deal>There is no other way to get users to generate valueeven something as simple as a subscription is enough to make that statement false, how someone decided to monetize their stuff is not my problem>All websites can stay online only by selling adswell that's also not true, my college website doesn't sell ads, a personal blog of some random guy is also not selling ads etc>People think they do not want the adsmost services simply provide you with a paid subscription to remove the ads, and it clearly works since people gladly pay for it>and just avoid malicious sitesit's not as simple as that, and ublock actually helps you with this by blocking requests from known malware/malicious sites>With blanket content filtering they are leeching all contentthat's the part I'm actually interested in, specifically when you said that ublock installs malware etc etc in your previous postno, it doesn't break the functionality of the internet which doesn't depend on ads and tracking, it doesn't install malware and certainly it's not allowing people to leech as the content was free in the first place>stripping all capability to generate value from the internetI already addressed that, more than enough value is being generated for me to get away with adblock everywhere>so the only people who can stay up are censorious big tech sitesthat's already the case with a tiny amount of websites gathering most of the traffic, as you can see it didn't magically kill the rest of the internet and smaller sites
>>25614048YOU DON'T KNOW HOW THE READA=AYOU ARE IN HELL
>>25614048i unironically get my opinions about the books i read from the /lit/ archive by searching keywoards
>>25614397W O WSo many good ideas here.Lit is like a mystic for me. Only I can see who is who
bump
I took it down preemptively when the PHP exploit was announced and hoped to bring it back up after a day or two (that is, as soon as PHP was updated) but my day job has kept me busy over the past week. It'll be back online before the weekend.
>>25614032AH! THE .XYZ SUFFIX,THE X, THE Y, THE Z,THE LETTERS THAT RESERVED FOR MATHEMATICS BE.
>>25616391Ah, okay. Glad to hear all is well. That said, I was getting the same timed-out error when trying to edit a page prior to the full site downtime. Same situation? I can imagine I was late on getting the news about the PHP exploit and didn't connect it at the time, though I think it may have been my IP causing problems.And do you have an email associated with the domain that you check?t. guy you made a mod
>>25614048I care
>>25615004Not surprising this place is filled with indian porn addicts given that 1/3rd of this board at any given time is offtopic AI/culturewar/obvious xitter tourist shit
>>25616604I see a good, honourable man behind this post.
>>25616670You rarely, if ever, make a post that isn't white noise chaff.
