Why do women sort their books by color?
maybe she is autistic please be more respectful
>>25612343for shelf aura
>>25612343because she is a woman of color
>>25612393heh
>>25612343Who gives a fuck
>>25612343I see men do it all the time too, putting their Penguin blacks all next to each other and shit. That pic is a diff level tho fs lol
I hope the white girls in her ballet class weren't too mean to her.
>>25612343Fuck it. I'm going to do this just to figure out the inner workings of their minds. It may take me all day. But I'll get it done.
>>25613326you should publish your findings, instant worldwide recognition
>>25612343they don't actually read the books. they are just props
>>25613333My Aristotle's The Art of Rhetoric is Oxford whilst my Poetics is Norton Critical. To separate them based on spine colour just seems barbaric to me. The female mind continues to confound me.
>>25612343why are you watching this shit, fuckwit?fuck youget fuckeddumb fuck
>>25612343books are just house decor for them>>25613239sorting by publisher makes sense, especially if it's shit like penguin classics or oxford classics or loebs etc.
>>25612343Anon, everything women do (and I do mean EVERYTHING) is performative.They don't like to read, they like to be seen as readers.They don't have opinions and preferences, they just regurgitate whatever combinations of words they think will make them liked by the group.And so on.
>>25613394>sorting by publisher makes sense, especially if it's shit like penguin classics or oxford classics or loebs etcWhy? Sorting the bookshelf is supposed to be about making everything as quickly accessible as possible. If I want to pull a book I read 2 years ago or something I bought and haven't read yet, I'll remember the author's name before I'll remember which edition of the book I got. What logic is there to sorting by edition that isn't just aesthetics? If it is just aesthetics then that's just as silly as sorting by color
>>25613436I organize them by theme
>>25613239I sort by hope to dread
>>25612343holy fuck i need her name i am so horny for intellectual girls
>>25613913She's larping you dumb dumb, honestly, I bet you prowl the local library thinking you'll find a dark academia big tittie goth GF who reads Kant
>>25613968hot
>>25612343What else would you do with books that you've never read/never will read?
>>25612343I was trying to think of fun alternate ways I could organize my shelves. Right now it's pretty standard, fiction, theatre, poetry, and nonfiction with a subsection in theatre for Shakespeare and one in nonfiction for the history of print/the rare books field. I was thinking it could be fun to organize the fiction, theatre, and poetry chronologically by date of publication, then intersperse the nonfiction by the time period of the topic, so for example a modern study of Greek mythology would go next to ancient Greek poetry and theatre.
>>25612343>>25613436personally I organize my books based on phonetic and associative adjacency, so my book on owls is next to the book on vowels, etc.this has totally revolutionized the way I find books. dewey decimal fags and the rest of you are retards.
>>25612343visually oriented by the phenomenal appearance of the book cover itself, instead of oriented by ("hidden" to the eyes) essence of the book.If you're looking for a specific book and can memorize all the books within a certain color then i suppose there's nothing wrong with organizing books by a phenomenal aesthetic system. Although eventually i could see this getting too difficult to find a book you want.
>white males would never use a book as their canvas -ACK
I don't know a single woman who sorts her books. None of my GFs have ever sorted their books.
>>25613394Don't pretend you're above it. Books are just house decor for everybody in the age of libgen et al.
>>25612343They're children.
>>25612343They were meant to pick and sort berries. Also every single one of them has an Adderall prescription.
>>25612343commodification of books, reading as commercialization/social media hobby.
>>25613352women function best, more or less, when they get lobotomies.
>>25613968>I bet you prowl the local library thinking you'll find a dark academia big tittie goth GF who reads KantThat was, erm, an very repressed thought, question is, how do You even know that?
>>25614531>they only had like a handful of books, not even enough to afford vertical staking
>>25614551A trvke too radical for /lit/men in denial to acknowledge.
>>25612343Because they like colors
>>25612343Because for millions of years our male ancestors preferred to breed with such females. Or it's an autistic habit piggybacking on something else that was selected. Or it's a result of social influence. Or a combo of all this and more.
>>25613913>intellectual
>>25612343>Takes one instance>Extrapolates it to 4.1 billion people.This is not a literature thread. This is a /pol/tard thread.
