>Neck Circumference13.5 inches. 75% percentile women's neck circumference34.4 cm which is a size at which women have increased risk of cardiovascular issues. Too thick to rope, thick enough to die from
>>45150678This is my neck size too but it used to be thicker before I lost weight (im still 5'5 175 lbs)
>>45150678>12.5"rare success
>>45150678>30cmI swear before I was born, I got lucky on body traits since I had to be a tranny
>>45150678like 36cm kek but i'm a lifter with a lot of upper body muscle development, it was smaller back when i was skinny and didn't really work out. anyway it's more about how it looks compared to your jaw, shoulders, etc. like if you have a big head and a long skinny neck you'll look like a bobblehead.
>>4515067834.5cmI wouldn't say it's too thick to rope, noose still fits snugly enough
No, but i have fantasized about vampires feeding on me.
>>45150678>34.4 cm which is a size at which women have increased risk of cardiovascular issues. You people really need to put the values on that site into relation with your proportions. The site has a bmi filter, use it. Neck thickness corresponds strongly to bmi, and the reason women with that neck thickness get cardiovascular issues is cause most of them are fat.
>>4515067816 inch kirkumference, its over
>>45150678WTF ANTHRO.UNI.FREIBURG IS DOWN FOR ME WHERE THE FUCK CAN I FIND OUT HOW OVER IT IS??????
>>45154586https://troontraits.web.app/
>>45154667can i get a normal xy axis and not this xyz cube shit? I only have two variables to measure
>>45154685You can't, because it's vibe coded trash and the developer ran out of api credits before they could implement that
>>45154798jfc really? enshittification truly encompasses all
>>45150678mine used to be 11 at its lowest before i gained
>>45154499Op here fuck you, I’m only doing this shit to spread my body image issues to other people. Who actually gives a shit about cardiovascular issues i just said that to say something
>>45156314I don't want people to feel bad about themselves for no reason. It makes zero sense to doom over individual decontextualized measurements. Something like >>45154667 but controlling and normalizing measurements for height and bmi would actually be helpful for determining clocky features and optimizing for surgerymaxxing. That's what this board used to be about, being real, locking in and fixing what you could. But nutroons just want excuses to doom and rotmaxx, and I guess cherrypicking obscure measurements is great for that, so it will always get more engagement than actually being real
>>45150678It’s ogre now.
