Wtf happened to these? Where are they? Production update a year ago? Did they all died?
there is at least one on guns.com. you just need the lower almost any upper will work
>>65622917it will never not be funny to me, that their traditional stocked lower with their beltfed upper is more legal in cali than a standard upperthe only thing you "have" to do is load every 11th round with a dummy cartridge, and theres zero restrictions on a beltfed after thati still regret not buying more beltfeds while i was there, they were so much cheaper
>>65622971>wont ship to CAWhy is life so CRUEL?
>>65623072https://store.fm-products.com/catalog/ranch-rifle
>>65623077Do these fit standard uppers by chance?
>>65623086I doubt it since they don't have a buffer tube
>>65623150Nooooooooo! I WANT THE SCR TO RETURN HELP ME HELP ME IM IN PAIN!
>>65622917I think they can sometimes be sexor
>>65623455looks like something the French would use since post WW2 until the 90's
>>65622917literal VC1 rifle
>>65623590baker girl
>>65623150The bolt carrier has an extension like an FAL that interfaces with a spring in the stock, again, like an FAL. Normal uppers work fine, you just need a new carrier.
MARACA SOLO!
>>65623150>I doubt it since they don't have a buffer tubeIt does not use a buffer tube, it has a modified bolt carrier with a rat tail that pushes against a metal cup which pushes against springs in the stock. Not to scale not legal advice not financial advice do your own research.
>>65625029The SCR carrier generally works with any typical AR15 bolt, non-standard stuff is a crapshoot. Anything that depends on is own type of carrier is shit out of luck (so no rifle-stocked AR57).People have built .300s, .458s, and .50s with it.
>>65625029>>65625197He wasn't talking about the SCR.
>>65625213Woops, disregard my post, I sucked cocks.
>>65625224Nothin wrong with that.
