/k/ - Now that military conflicts are unwinable why don’ - Weapons

Anonymous

10/30/26(Fri)07:02:52 No.65621276

File: IMG_6085.png (195 KB, 680x532)

195 KB PNG

Anonymous 10/30/26(Fri)07:02:52 No.65621276 Archived

>>65621284 >>65621285 >>65621837

Now that military conflicts are unwinable why don’t we just solve them with 1v1 duels?

Each country selects its best fighter pilot and aircraft and then they go 1v1 in the air winner wins the conflict

Anonymous
10/30/26(Fri)07:11:23 No.65621284

Anonymous 10/30/26(Fri)07:11:23 No.65621284

>>65621276
they aren't.
your premise is false.

Anonymous
10/30/26(Fri)07:11:36 No.65621285

Anonymous 10/30/26(Fri)07:11:36 No.65621285

>>65621288 >>65621837

>>65621276
malfoid?

Anonymous
10/30/26(Fri)07:15:38 No.65621288

Anonymous 10/30/26(Fri)07:15:38 No.65621288

>>65621285
Biggus Impregnatus

Anonymous
10/30/26(Fri)07:16:10 No.65621290

Anonymous 10/30/26(Fri)07:16:10 No.65621290

File: images.jpg (50 KB, 663x462)

50 KB JPG

There has long been a school of thought that individual combat is both the most fair and practical way of settling disputes.

We live in the best version of the best of all possible worlds

Anonymous
10/30/26(Fri)13:51:50 No.65621837

Anonymous 10/30/26(Fri)13:51:50 No.65621837

File: hqdefault.jpg (22 KB, 480x360)

22 KB JPG

>>65621276
modern war is essentially a 1v1 show to cover the fact that glownigger policy and joo economics are the real battlefield
>>65621285
>POTTEEER WHY ARE YOU SHITPOSTING ON /K/ GO GET MALFOID PREGNANT SO LUCIUS BEATS DOBBY AGAIN, 100 POINTS TO GRYFFINDOR!
he stated calmly.