[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
4chan
/k/ - Weapons


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.




File: HVmSg6KWkAAsTQs.jpg (46 KB, 631x486)
46 KB JPG
>every single army in WW2: small machine gun in squads and assign medium machine guns to platoons, we have extra big machine guns in the company if it isnt enough
>british: small machine guns in the platoon and all other machine guns with the division
why were the british so weird about machine guns?
it cant have been that good if no one, not even the british, use that system today
>>
>>65620802
The bongs, for better and frequently for worse, always did their own thing. Tanks, planes, ships, infantry weapons.

These days they're pretty boring and it's the French who try the wacky shit.
>>
>>65620802
>small machine gun in squads and assign medium machine guns to platoons
Only the Germans had true machine guns on the section level. The others' are best understood as automatic rifles. though the distinction has been lost to time in English.
>assign medium machine guns to platoons,
Those were on the company level where they existed, e.g. the United States, while machine gun companies armed with heavy machine guns sat on the battalion level in general.

Brits used bren carriers instead.
>>
>>65620846
>The others' are best understood as automatic rifles. though the distinction has been lost to time in English.
all the automatic rifles were used as LMGs in practice

>Those were on the company level where they existed, e.g. the United States
company level MGs were assigned to cover for platoons and were de facto under platoon control during combat

>Brits used bren carriers instead.
the british company level UC was a staff car, and they only got a single one per company compared
>>
File: 1775860781673720.jpg (329 KB, 3000x1921)
329 KB JPG
>>65620853
>all the automatic rifles were used as LMGs in practice
Not as "LMG" was understood as back then, which is why I said the distinction is lost in English.
The automatic rifles were also factually somewhat incapable of filling the role of an LMG properly due to lack of ammo and resupplying capacity. A single machine gunner in a modern section realistically carries significantly more ammunition than the entire automatic rifle team did in WW2 and can provide a vastly superior amount of firepower.
The modern LMG is in its operation closer to the WW2 company level weapon systems. The M1919 was specifically called and LMG as well.
>company level MGs were assigned to cover for platoons and were de facto under platoon control during combat
Doesn't change the fact that they're on the company level in the weapons platoon.
>the british company level UC was a staff car, and they only got a single one per company compared
Support company on the battalion level with a bren platoon instead of heavy machine guns.
>>
>>65620883
>The automatic rifles were also factually somewhat incapable of filling the role of an LMG properly due to lack of ammo and resupplying capacity.
they were used just fine in that role
belf-fed LMGs are better but mag-fed LMGs were nonetheless used successfully

in any case, this is all just sidetracking from the original premise
every army in WW2 had their LMG (which includes automatic rifles) as organic squad weapons with platoons having their own machine guns (company-level on paper, subordinate to platoon in practice)

whereas the british squad has no machine guns, with all machine guns (bren is a machine gun) in under platoon control and the vickers machine gun section being all the way up in divisional sections
>>
File: 1775163459055517.jpg (330 KB, 2048x1448)
330 KB JPG
>>65620902
>whereas the british squad has no machine guns
Where did you get this misconception from? The British WW2 infantry section is specifically built around the bren gun. Each infantry section has one bren gun in it. Three of them in one platoon.
>>
>>65620902
>with platoons having their own machine guns (company-level on paper, subordinate to platoon in practice)
Only the Americans AFAIK. Everyone else generally kept them on the battalion level or above in either machine gun companies or machine gun battalions. Automatic rifles in rifle squads, machine guns in machine gun companies.
>>
>>65620929
I bothered looking it up and the Soviets added one HMG to the company for a while in the middle of the war, only to remove them.
Germans added two HMGs late war into the authorized strength of rifle companies, KStN 131n, but not present in Volksgrenadier divisions.
BTC
bc1qtm4rep7kyp2p28hlkfktpnd0j7uew47vnt2mev
LTC
ltc1q9xlaysse0mpfwf025esd69kt9zu3md22gh23du
ETH
0x6abA18D203520c8F90ca63eE7426a7bC345D98e6
SOL
E5ekoiauCR8yiNp451dmuPzhUxo84P5x3m9WJBK5kxZe
XRP
r3jYXNdMk2Vz5hXhKCKE9re8uz93JQFG1r
DOGE
DSBq5jRWkiwmEh1G7zBwmQDgRkvRr61fmb
XMR
85CTwq5wGjWZw5GgzgwZPrHyZxpLXMK5oZSSSk5j4x9w1bpqzisaWAUZYaAPfh6rP2MZJcaFqF1XmEzkw6YCqJSS2Txu6Z8




Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.