Who thought it was a good idea to allow an influx of people from nations with 100+ MILLION poor people?Isn't that kind of crazy? That european/western politicians never do the simple maths of >hey, hold up, this place has nearly 2 billion people that want to leave that shithole>my small euro country has a population 300 times smaller than that, should we MAYBE cap the entry visas?It would solve literally every single socioeconomic problem of the modern day if we just approached things a little more sensibly. But somehow watching the world turn into a declining hellscape which in turn fuels racism is more ethical?
When you're in charge of human capital the idea of colour and culture is abstracted out of the equation. All you care about is how many people you can get into the workforce and how cheaply you can pay them.
>>225896750$$$them$$$
>>225896927
>>225896750It’s easy to understand really…They wanted to keep benefiting from the profits generated by exploiting third world workers without the colonialism being so overt.They’d prefer to have these third work workers provide all the labor tasks for cheap instead of having to hire native citizens and pay them more money for the same task. The solution was obvious. Replace the native worker with people from the third world and make them citizens.
>>225896750Who thought it was a good idea? Jews. And i don't mean the ones who worship in a synagogue. I mean really cheap fucks. Back in the day, when working conditions were unthinkably abysmal and the workday was long, like 12 hours, the business owners would exploit the native population of a city mercilessly. Im talking your boss might rape you and you have to still go to work the next day or your entire family starves on the streets. well after all those people died or became crippled, they brought in european immigrants. they sound funny, but they look like us. well they got exploited. then they brought in black people from the south. you can guess what happened. then they brought in asians and mexicans. yup. ruthlessly exploited. so on and so on until the present day. working conditions are better, but it took actual gunfights to make it happen
>>225896750>influx of people from nations with 100+ MILLION poor people?Not all of them are poor nor is it accurate to say they all come from large states. Being hyperbolic makes you look like an ass and counterproductive to pushing for key immigration reforms.>It would solve literally every single socioeconomic problem of the modern day if we just approached things a little more sensibly.Vague statement about a super complex and mutli-faceted problem with no real proposals.>But somehow watching the world turn into a declining hellscape which in turn fuels racism is more ethical?Chuds could make fuel out of thin air if they could. The idea racism would increase or decrease is silly since you had raging assholes go act like total cunts towards people regardless. If you worked in Healthcare in many parts of the west as an immigrant or had an accent they outright told you to basically take all the abuse patients and families would throw at you. To this day many hospitals, clinics and care facilties de jure still have that policy.
>>225896750Libya used to be the country they went to for economic reasons instead before America destroyed it. Had Gaddafi been allowed to do his gold back African currency, Europe would have no migrants except maybe as tourists, and Muslims and sub Saharan Africans would be earning living wages in Libya.Depending on how good it would've gotten, maybe even Euros would be migrating to Libya
>>225897737>Libya used to be the country they went to for economic reasons instead before America destroyed it.Not really and America did not destroy it. Sarkozy was the one who pushed and led the NATO procedures.>Had Gaddafi been allowed to do his gold back African currencyLiterally impossible nor ideal to do so. More established currenies would be less risky to hold onto and trade. >Europe would have no migrants except maybe as tourists, and Muslims and sub Saharan Africans would be earning living wages in Libya.Who told you this slop? Also people would still be moving to and from Europe for work, education and research.
>>225896750They knew exactly what would happen. It's intentional.
>>225897775Yes but poor would have no reason to go to Europe because they would have just continued going to Libya to wage a few years like they had been doing before it was destroyed
>>225896750See: >>225896806The biggest proponents of immigration are right wing corporations, not leftists. Companies want cheap exploitable labour. When it becomes a problem, they offload the social issues to leftists.
You are all wrong https://www.youtube.com/shorts/3VQ9NKFApMo
>>225896750Genuine question. Do people like you think you really live the same life as these politicians who makes these choices?
>>225897723So what’s the plan after this? Who’s next on the chopping block?
Why don't firsties just get the jobs you don't want so we won't be imported to your countries
>>225898195>Companies want cheap exploitable labour.Outside of illegals on farms or in construction, you get paid the same an enjoy the same labour rights and status.
>>225896750Politicians are more interested in holding on to power than in making their countries stronger and more prosperous. Opening borders to thirdies is a calculated move.
>>225898641What types of lives do those in power hold other than eating infants? I’d imagine their desires are very abstract compared to your average goy
>>225896750The European pension system needs them. It's not just sickening profits but keeping the whole system afloat both in trying to brute force a local circular economy to justify expenditure on infrastructure and services and the global elite looking to snatch a large chunk.
>>225896750he hasn't noticed
