Why did china lose the AI race against the mutts?
>>225856043It's the same reason why Europe can't figure out why mutts keep outperforming them. The US will train some overspecialized person who can't even tie their shoes, but knows category theory or some risky vocation that's borderline useless outside of specific niche then pay them like 20x more than anywhere else.
doesn't that channel always post doomer videos that only 5% of the time come true?
>>225856198No. It's a meme channel. But it doesn't matter because Chinese ai stocks fell 42% in 3 months
>>225856198This time is actually true though
investors fall for the meme of qwen 27b parameters loleits over
A bubble bursting earlier rather than later is good thoughbeit?
>>225857106If it's something that's already 100% functional and can easily be integrated then yes, otherwise no it looks giving up if it bursts too early and you're just slashing businesses because there's no gain left in it. Fuck India and China btw, I half think they're trying to sabotage AI because they're like 60% of the startups and almost all of them are useless and will 100% die when it finally pops.
In India the AI bubble has not even started
>>225856043Timmywan bro, you realize the same is happening to you soon now that Intel is spinning the block
People who use the stock market to track Chinese economic or productive development are genuinely retarded. Don't believe me, look up the triumphalist China is over slop when the the EV and solar panel """"bubble""" burst and five years later China ended up dominating both industries indisputably worldwide.
This thread was moved to >>>/pol/545149780