[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
4chan
/int/ - International


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.




File: 4917.png (70 KB, 371x361)
70 KB PNG
>The Jews made us build a global empire and force our culture on the rest of the world
>>
I don’t say this or look like or do this
>>
>>225845251
When is the last American anything you've consumed? The US has no culture, nor does it seem to care, you can't be oppressed by something that doesn't exist.
>>
>>225845337
I watched the dog star today.
>>
>>225845251
You are not forced to learn our culture.
>>
>>225845366
Did you like it? Last thing I watched was Hotel Budapest and Game of Thrones. I liked both quite a bit, but I don't really consider either American, I could barely believe GoT was an American show I thought it was British.
>>
>>225845471
It had bad pacing, but it was okay.
>>
>>225845337
Watched avatar 3 yesterday
It was shit btw
>>
>>225845251
Da globalists are everyone else, not US!!
>>
>>225845728
Unironically yes, the US would balkanize the entire world if given the opportunity. They tried selling film equipment to poor countries, but most just wanted to outsource media, that's why the entire third world was glassed by anime because Japan gave it rights to it for free.
>>
>>225845251
American Imperialism started during their economic invasion of Japan and then the wars with Mexico and later, Spain. All of these happened when they were still anti-semitic. The pro-Israel infection only truly started after Kennedy got brained. Coincidence?
>>
>>225846926
>pro-Israel
I cannot name a single person I've met who likes them, it is more publicly accepted to be pro-Palestine and pro-Iran than pro-Israel by far. Also Japan has never been anti-semitic they literally fought Russia backed by some jew's loans who literally said he only backed Japan because Russia was anti-semitic. This was in 1905. Then Japan tried created an Israel in Shanghai 30 years later.
>>
>>225845251
America is islamic wet dream. I dont know why people associate them with extreme christianity. The american dream is basically earthly manifestation of muslims concept of heaven. They are culture war obsessed mass murdering pedophile worshipper.
>>
>>225845337
>The US has no culture
bait
>>
>>225846926
I wouldn't describe either Nixon, Ford, Carter, Reagan, or Bush Sr. as unanimously pro-Israel. LBJ you have a better case for, but for example, Trump has been more affectionate towards the country than all these Presidents. LBJ's admiration for the country really only started in earnest during the success of '67, cause he was personally impressed by the martial prowess. Even then, he and the state department were very averse to Israel striking the first blow.
>>
>>225847257
And the pro-Israel infection was present in both Kennedy brothers long before John became a Presidential candidate. It's likely that Robert Kennedy beating Nixon would have resulted in a highly favourable diplomatic disposition towards Israel.
>>
No, Jews happened later.
>>
>>225847257
Nixon was an actual president not the post-modern abominations we've had since. He doesn't see borders on a map if he wanted to resolve something politically he'd get on a plane and start negotiating rather than letting a map or stereotype outsize reality. Quite literally the last real president the feds ever produced, now they're basically a theatre production. LBJ was quite possibly the least popular president, he managed to piss off everyone from conservatives to New Dealers, he was simultaneously a New Dealer and a warmonger. Eisenhower was staunchly anti-Israel, he wanted to support Egypt and demanded that Israel withdraw from Sinai and Gaza.
>>
>>225847394
Eisenhower's Middle East policy was pretty ruinous when it comes to British & French power, though. Putting all his cards on Arab nationalism allowed him to get played.
>>
>>225847552
Pan-Arabism was always higher reward than backing Israel. T. E. Lawrence and the Brits bet everything on it and failed, Israel is safe, but has almost no long term benefits. The pivot to Iran was a smart move in the 1970s, but it barely lasted a decade until they started warring with Iraq.
>>
>>225847689
>higher reward
The reward will always be zero because the so-called Arabs can’t be trusted, even their name is deceptive (they’re not Arabs if they’re not from Arabia)
BTC
bc1qtm4rep7kyp2p28hlkfktpnd0j7uew47vnt2mev
LTC
ltc1q9xlaysse0mpfwf025esd69kt9zu3md22gh23du
ETH
0x6abA18D203520c8F90ca63eE7426a7bC345D98e6
SOL
E5ekoiauCR8yiNp451dmuPzhUxo84P5x3m9WJBK5kxZe
XRP
r3jYXNdMk2Vz5hXhKCKE9re8uz93JQFG1r
DOGE
DSBq5jRWkiwmEh1G7zBwmQDgRkvRr61fmb
XMR
85CTwq5wGjWZw5GgzgwZPrHyZxpLXMK5oZSSSk5j4x9w1bpqzisaWAUZYaAPfh6rP2MZJcaFqF1XmEzkw6YCqJSS2Txu6Z8




Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.