>>8072223
i don't have thoughts.

Indifferent. Just deny any accusation and move on. Trad and Digital timelapses can be doctored and everyone's views on it have always been arbitrary. If you really want to prove you're doing everything "legit", do your art traditionally and have everything laid out, frame it perfectly and show yourself doing the work in real time (Which can still be doctored regardless).

It only matters if you're concerned about what some random dipshit has to say. They probably didn't even like your work anyway, and are just busy witch hunting so they can have a moment of e-relevance.

Just say 'no.' to their accusations and ignore them otherwise.

File: sleepy-donald-duck-in-bed(...).jpg (44 KB, 500x749)

44 KB JPG

>>8072322

I used to tag my work as AI on Twitter because I was bored and already not getting any attention, you could clearly tell it wasn't because it's DeviantArt tier garbage, sometimes I posted a timelapse and sometimes it was trad but people still believed it just because there was a small note on the bottom of the post because at the end of the day people are retarded.

Nowadays if you post a timelapse they'll say the timelapse is AI, they'll say you traced AI on a hidden layer, they'll say you had AI sketch it and rendered it yourself, they'll say it has AI "vibes" and all sorts of shit. Even if you draw live on fucking Twitch they'll say you found a way to overlay an AI drawing on top with AR glasses or whatever, it's not AI because of any evidence it's AI because the other retard wants it to.

Now 9 times out of 10 it actually was and the retard was right but at some point you're just going to have to just trust people a bit.

unless you like making timelapses, I don't see the point
like >>8072270 says, trying to convince retards is a worthless battle

>>8072322
the secret to happiness? don't fight against retards.
>I disagree
you're right.