The real redpill is that you don't need to be good at drawing to be sucesfull.
I already knew that
being bad at drawing doesn't mean you'll be successful tho
>>8069249>The real redpill is that you don't need to be good at drawing to be sucesfull.The problem with you anons is your priorities are completely backwards. You are trying to look impressive to everyone else instead of focusing on actual self improvement. Even if you manage to get rich, you all still fail with that mindset.
creativity trumps skill a creative artist with minimal technical skill will shine far brighter than an uncreative artist that can make perfect loomis heads thats why /ic/ anons are in constant anguish, they dont actually want to draw or have any cool ideas they just have to put onto paper. theyre forcing themselves to do it. for what purpose i couldnt tell you
>>8069303This
True. You just need to have a soul, which 99.87% of people here don't have.
>>8069249That was actually the time and fund for 10,000+ movies so the fund for each one is actually less than 1500$. AI won big time.
>>8069249I haven't watched movie itself but the Niu Lai situation did warm my heart. How the movie got made to begin with, all the handmade posters, its success, all that in a country that fucking loves AI. Maybe we still have hope...
>>8069249I went to London MCM and there were /beg/s with booths. I didn't stalk them to see how much they sold though, so I don't know whether it's a net gain or loss.
But I also want to be good at drawing
why do people always act like creativity and technical skill are mutually exclusive
>>8069371True, but self-improvement is also the mindset of the pathetic self-defeating eternal loser, you will go nowhere with it. You need to believe in your art as it is, learning should be a side-effect. If you think your art needs to be improved to be worthwile you will keep thinking it until you're dead.
>>8069249You only need to be as good as you need to be to achieve your own artistic goals. Charles Schwartz was hardly a brilliant artist, but he made stuff, and his work was appealing enough. Want to draw simple b/w cartoony characters, you won't need to practice too much; want to draw realistic figures in complex environments all perfectly rendered in a coloured painted style?... well, you'll need a big more practice.appeal is probably the only real thing you need, but how you quantify or train your appeal is a bit of a mystery. It probably just comes down to good taste, and being objective about your own work.>>8069446Supposedly the mother and son who made the film weren't too thrilled with it's success, and were perhaps embarrassed by it? Hopefully they can use all the cash they made to wipe away their tears.>in a country that fucking loves AI.The worlds first feature length AI film also completely bombed there recently as well. I guess the average consumer dislike AI more than the sloppers let on?
>>8069446>wo cowLol
>>8069249You don't even need to draw to be successful.
>>8070397How can an AI film bomb? The costs to make it are basically zero. When a film bombs at the box office it didn't cover the costs. Since I only heard of the film after "bombing", I doubt there even was a marketing budget besides maybe the local city the prompter was in.Sounds like a big cope to me.
>>8069443Has nothing to do wit soul. It's just normies gobblign up retarded memes. If you are good at pandering to retards then you are more successfull than someone who can draw well. That's how Shadman became so popular. He just was good at creating viral meme shit
>>8070864Unless you mean the bomb angle is entirely made up, aren't you saying it's worse, they were still unsuccessful despite their extremely low budget?
>>8070864>How can an AI film bomb? The costs to make it are basically zero.By making less than it cost. Same as with every other film. It cost $1.5 million, it made $150 thousand, and I doubt that counts the time cost of the project either (over two years).The film's name was Sanxingdui: Future Past.
