/ic/ - Pillowfort dood - Artwork/Critique

Anonymous

Pillowfort dood 10/19/26(Mon)19:08:05 No.8065291

File: image.png (60 KB, 910x585)

60 KB PNG

Pillowfort dood Anonymous 10/19/26(Mon)19:08:05 No.8065291 Archived

>>8065365 >>8065418 >>8065528 >>8066192

Wat nou? Seems like all the attempts to replace ArtStation and Twitter failed, in a few years we can expect the same from Bluesky

Anonymous
10/19/26(Mon)19:53:16 No.8065314

Anonymous 10/19/26(Mon)19:53:16 No.8065314

lol

Anonymous
10/19/26(Mon)20:05:35 No.8065325

Anonymous 10/19/26(Mon)20:05:35 No.8065325

Haha

Anonymous
10/19/26(Mon)20:59:31 No.8065344

Anonymous 10/19/26(Mon)20:59:31 No.8065344

nooooooo whatttt noo wayyyy i cant belive it

Anonymous
10/19/26(Mon)22:01:54 No.8065365

Anonymous 10/19/26(Mon)22:01:54 No.8065365

>>8065291
What do you mean they can't find someone to run It? What the fuck

Anonymous
10/19/26(Mon)23:54:24 No.8065418

Anonymous 10/19/26(Mon)23:54:24 No.8065418

>>8065291
sheeeit there's porn on here I know isn't anywhere else and I gotta save it now

Anonymous
10/20/26(Tue)04:30:18 No.8065528

Anonymous 10/20/26(Tue)04:30:18 No.8065528

>>8065291
>Seems like all the attempts to replace ArtStation and Twitter failed
This was never an attempt at either -- it was an attempt at recreating tumblr before it went to shit.
If we're talking social sites we're interested in, I'm rather optimistic about Haven.social when it comes out, but we'll have to see if they achieve even half of what they're claiming to do.

Anonymous
10/20/26(Tue)04:32:52 No.8065530

Anonymous 10/20/26(Tue)04:32:52 No.8065530

>>8065598

bever even heard of pillowfort
what does that say about me?

Anonymous
10/20/26(Tue)08:26:53 No.8065598

Anonymous 10/20/26(Tue)08:26:53 No.8065598

>>8065681

>>8065530
>bever even heard of pillowfort
>what does that say about me?
That you've never heard of pillowfort.

Anonymous
10/20/26(Tue)11:48:36 No.8065681

Anonymous 10/20/26(Tue)11:48:36 No.8065681

>>8065598
fascinating...

Anonymous
10/22/26(Thu)01:15:51 No.8066192

Anonymous 10/22/26(Thu)01:15:51 No.8066192

>>8065291
I would have used it if they had fixed their search engine at least... it was just not possible to search for multiple tags at once.