>>2717849
>>2717850
>>2717851
>>2717853
Underwear is fine but where the nudes

>>2717850
We need to see Cavill's hairy pink hole

>>2717893
Local models are generally not very good at rendering male genitals still. There aren't really any with an adequate dataset for it because the organizations doing training for image generation models are extremely paranoid about csam content laws. The few image models that have substantial nsfw data in their training datasets are very, very heavily censored before they're made available to the public.
So even if the handler / classifier is decensored afterwards, they don't have anything they can actually produce genitals with.
Private organizations developing / training models for nsfw production are basically the equivalent of trying to make a blockbuster superhero movie on a budget of twenty thousand dollars. It's just not gonna happen.

>>2717929
Guarantee you twelve months from now there will be prolific generation of all sorts of nasty things. The technology is a capital furnace but people are still throwing money in it.

Does any body have some Jude Law, Hugh Jackman or Paul Walker?

>>2717935
And here we are, in the internet's crustiest, most outdated cesspit looking for more AI generated images just for the sake of puerile titillation.