Either some of the letters in the bible that claim to be written by Paul or Peter are forgeries, and their authors deliberately bore false witness, or all of the letters are legitimate, which would require an overwhelming amount of evidence to overturn the current evidence to the contrary. And no amount of "trust me bro" is going to convince anyone.Even if you cope by saying that god can act and teach through sin, why would god muddy the waters in a way that makes his whole word look like any other human fabricated religion rather than something divinely inspired? Why would he go out of his way to deceive humans this much?
>>18768096It matters not, if the text survives and inspires saints to follow virtue then it's because it is divinely inspired. This is the belief of every Christian.
>>18768102How can commiting of of the top 10 worst sins possibly be a divine inspiration worthy of becoming god's own word without contradiction?
>>18768109Peter already did that anon. Denied Jesus thrice.
>>18768117Peter is a human, and is subject to sin and salvation just like anyone else.We are talking about god's own word.
>>18768124The authors may have lied just as Peter did, but the text inspires faith, and is worthy of being included in the canons if the Spirit has allowed it to survive and called many to the faith through it.
>>18768096It doesn't actually matter what it says in there.
